User talk:Eugen Simion 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Disambiguation link notification for March 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coverage of Google Street View, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apollonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Need to fix oldest images[edit]

In Japan, United States and more some locations, have a error in the date, please edit Coverage of Google Street View page to fix oldest images. 179.223.103.197 (talk) 23:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Mapillary logo.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mapillary logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 21:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

GSV coverage[edit]

Hi. The source for the Torres del Paine update is from an anonymous IP on the Google Street View in Chile article (see diff). These roads were not there when Punta Arenas was added back on 6 March, so they were definitely added some time after. I've found no media coverage of this addition, thus I'm not sure of the date. Pristino (talk) 00:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Would you like this page to be semi-protected?[edit]

Hi Eugen, Please let me know if you'd like this talk page to be semi-protected for a while to stop that vandal posting on it. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Oh thanks. Of course I want to stop that freaking vandal. An indefinitive protection will be great, because the vandal will strike again. Can you do something also for Coverage of Google Street View after April 30, like an indefinitive semi-proteciton?- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 14:18, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
OK. Indefinite duration seems excessive (as this means that no IP editor will be able to contact you directly until the protection is lifted), but I've protected this page for a one-month period. I'd be happy to extend this if the vandal still has nothing better to do with their time after 30 days though (and have this page watchlisted). Thanks for pointing out the the protection of the article was getting close to expiring - I've just extended it considerably. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 22:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coverage of Google Street View, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Svay Rieng and Sihanoukville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coverage of Google Street View, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erdene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coverage of Google Street View, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shalimar Garden and Government College University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Request for update the file Google Street View coverage.png[edit]

Please update the following file: Google Street View coverage.png

Before[edit]

Google Street View coverage.png

After[edit]

Google Street View Eugen Simion 14 request - Aug 20, 2015.png

Please update the file to change color to light orange for Kenya. Diretor Adobe (talk) 13:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

ITN for 2015 Vuelta a España[edit]

--SpencerT♦C 05:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2009 New Ireland earthquake[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article 2009 New Ireland earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WikiProject Earthquakes is not documenting events like this—not even in lists of earthquakes. This M6.7 event is just not notable. The area where it occurred is seismically active. Extremely active. There were no less than 21 events of M6.7 or greater during the period January 1, 2000 to present. There is nothing to write about the majority of these events.

[http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/#{%22feed%22%3A%221445125851100%22%2C%22search%22%3A{%22id%22%3A%221445125851100%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22Search%20Results%22%2C%22isSearch%22%3Atrue%2C%22params%22%3A{%22starttime%22%3A%222000-01-01%2000%3A00%3A00%22%2C%22maxlatitude%22%3A-2.087%2C%22minlatitude%22%3A-7.144%2C%22maxlongitude%22%3A-203.818%2C%22minlongitude%22%3A-209.224%2C%22minmagnitude%22%3A6.7%2C%22endtime%22%3A%222015-10-16%2023%3A59%3A59%22%2C%22orderby%22%3A%22time%22

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.%2C%22listFormat%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22sort%22%3A%22newest%22%2C%22basemap%22%3A%22grayscale%22%2C%22autoUpdate%22%3Afalse%2C%22restrictListToMap%22%3Atrue%2C%22timeZone%22%3A%22utc%22%2C%22mapposition%22%3A[[-13.774066408054814%2C-216.36474609375]%2C[5.725311447610156%2C-196.5673828125]]%2C%22overlays%22%3A{%22plates%22%3Atrue}%2C%22viewModes%22%3A{%22help%22%3Afalse%2C%22list%22%3Atrue%2C%22map%22%3Atrue%2C%22settings%22%3Afalse}}]}} Dawnseeker2000 23:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Romanian Football[edit]

Can you help me to improve Romanian Football ??--Alexiulian25 (talk) 20:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2015 Romanian protests[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article 2015 Romanian protests has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A near duplicate of Colectiv nightclub fire#Protests, or already copied and pasted there. Does not work as a stand-alone article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015 Romanian protests for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Romanian protests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Romanian protests until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. George Ho (talk) 06:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

About new updates on Google street view[edit]

Sorry about last time I speak arrogantly, I hope you won't mind about that. I would like to ask 2 things, how can I know Google updated their street view and how can political problems be deal with on that Coverage of Google Street View page since I was working on the Chinese version.--owennsonMeeting RoomCertificates) 07:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Is it true that Kazakhstan has no Nazarbayev University image? Since the Kazakhstan one confused me.--owennsonMeeting RoomCertificates) 13:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Air France Flight 463[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Air France Flight 463 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hardly notable for a stand-alone article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 13:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Air France Flight 463 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air France Flight 463 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air France Flight 463 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MilborneOne (talk) 14:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of West Air Sweden Flight 294 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Air Sweden Flight 294 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Air Sweden Flight 294 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 02:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015 Roubaix shootings for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Roubaix shootings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Roubaix shootings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Daallo Airlines Flight 3159[edit]

I see you created the Daallo Airlines Flight 3159 article. You've been around long enough now to know that article needs structure. The better an article is, the better the chance of avoiding the deletionists. Suggest

  • lede
  • aircraft
  • event
  • investigation
  • references

would be appropriate. Mjroots (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 Thane stabbing for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Thane stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Thane stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 331dot (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 Thane stabbing for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Thane stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Thane stabbing (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greek Legend (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Google Street View image[edit]

Please make a new request in commons. Diretor Adobe (talk) 12:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Talk:Coverage_of_Google_Street_View#Scottish_Street_View

This is a discussion that you need to see. Pablothepenguin (talk) 10:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Content dispute on Eurovision Song Contest 2016[edit]

It has been noted that you have engaged in an edit war recently over the choice of description for Romanian's withdrawal at the Eurovision Song Contest 2016. Please note there is an active discussion taking place at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2016#Romania, Disqualified/Withdrew that I advise you to take a look and and perhaps contribute towards the debate, in order to reach a broad and mutual consensus with your fellow Wikipedian editors. Regards, Wes Mouse  09:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

My Edits[edit]

Stop messing around with my edits. Leave them alone, you have been reported to administrators. Pablothepenguin (talk) 19:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Huh? I think you are kidding me. That edits are called vandalism. - EugεnS¡m¡on 19:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
How dare you! The are not vandalism, they are good faith, but one is to remove unsourced information and the other is to ask a legitimate question in the talk page. Pablothepenguin (talk) 19:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
I don't have enough time for you, almost all your edits are trolling and vandalism and maybe you will be blocked forever. - EugεnS¡m¡on 19:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Talk:Coverage of Google Street View. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

For your information[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Click here[1] to see it....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bella (brand)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Bella (brand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

WP:ITSFAMOUS is not a valid rationale for notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Eugen Simion 14. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Semnatura.JPG listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Semnatura.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of O.b. (brand) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O.b. (brand) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O.b. (brand) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)