Jump to content

User talk:MatthewVanitas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 128: Line 128:


:*Right now you're working on both [[Draft:Sukuma calendar]] and [[Draft:Sukuma calendar (2)]], that's very confusing to editors. Please choose the one you want to keep, and ''blank'' (delete all text on) the other one.
:*Right now you're working on both [[Draft:Sukuma calendar]] and [[Draft:Sukuma calendar (2)]], that's very confusing to editors. Please choose the one you want to keep, and ''blank'' (delete all text on) the other one.
::[[Draft:Sukuma calendar (2)]] has been blanked.
:*Secondly, your article was deleted in the past because a body of editors were not convinced that such a thing as the "Sukuma calendar" exists. Have you carefully read [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sukuma calendar]] to see why the previous article was deleted? You ''must'' address those concerns before the draft could move forward. [[User:MatthewVanitas|MatthewVanitas]] ([[User talk:MatthewVanitas#top|talk]]) 23:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
:*Secondly, your article was deleted in the past because a body of editors were not convinced that such a thing as the "Sukuma calendar" exists. Have you carefully read [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sukuma calendar]] to see why the previous article was deleted? You ''must'' address those concerns before the draft could move forward. [[User:MatthewVanitas|MatthewVanitas]] ([[User talk:MatthewVanitas#top|talk]]) 23:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


Revision as of 16:28, 3 January 2017

For undated/unsigned posts not archived, see User talk:MatthewVanitas/Archive 23a.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Hi. I just reposted info for the Euroclearability definition. I hope it helps. I presume I recheck this thread to see a response as it's all public...?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.69.144.208 (talk) 20:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

11:48:14, 19 November 2016 review of submission by Chrismacrae


Quarter Bilion Girls - this was launched at un at smae time as wikipedia launched herstory - there is no difference of process in building what herstiory or quarterbilliongirls represent- why do you favor insuders when the whole point of this unlaunch was to enourage wider contributions to wikipedia

09:00:26, 24 November 2016 review of submission by 223.31.55.162


Atena Daemi

Hi, there is a Official source to name The Voice Project for Atena Daemi

I don't understand English more, and I want of you (( If you know the complete rules of how to work with Wikipedia )) that please add this resource and text about Atena Daemi in this article (Atena Daemi).

Source Address http://voiceproject.org/takeaction/drop-the-charges-against-atena-daemi

There are References here:

Thank you. --Aliresajavann (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Just a quick note to say thank you for taking the time to review my article submission request.

Kind regards.

Bedmonds2017 (talk) 13:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bahramaryana.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bahramaryana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for reviewing my article on Hale kesare within seconds of its creation. Regards, Prof TPMS (talk) 00:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have a safe new year

The real world might be safer than here, me thinks - cheers JarrahTree 06:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wuhan textile university

This is not a ad, please help me to create "wuhan textile university", thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zjjuseyy (talk • contribs) 08:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:12:43, 30 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by NemackiKutak


Hi Matthew,

I'm writing you since you are the reviewer of the articles I wrote. I'm not sure if I understand your feedback completely. What should I change to comply with policies? The Wikipedia page about Why But Why blog ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wait_But_Why ) was used as a reference.

Thanks for your time & feedback.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

NemackiKutak (talk) 10:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Novorossia TV

Hi, you reviewed Novorossia TV, but you didn't correct the mistake. Donetsk is not Russian city if you notice.--Beta Lohman (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AVS Video Converter

Hello, MatthewVanitas. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "AVS Video Converter".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Zupotachyon Ping me (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sukuma calendar and Draft:Sukuma calendar (2)

Dear MatthewVanitas,

I agree, there could be issues to resolve before resubmitting the draft. There could be many more sources coming about the Sukuma calendar, I agree too. I think, we should still improve the article as time goes. I am reviewing the draft still but would also appreciate some help.

Thank you (Nghwaya (talk) 13:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)).[reply]


Dear MatthewVanitas,

I have gone half way to comment out the grapjics. I can't be sure if this is the real reason for the demanded improvement. I'll be ready to improve or remove the graphics completely. Just say a word. I don't want to waste more time.

Thank you (Nghwaya (talk) 15:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

@Nghwaya:, you have two issues to address:

Review

Hi Matthew,

Thank you reviewing the page I created, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Murdoch The sources I used for references are official newspapers, as far I can tell correctly cited via the template. I don't understand why people keep placing the banner that de sources are unclear, they are not. Is there something else I should do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zonneroos (talk • contribs) 14:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Zonneroos:, the reason people are adding "more footnotes" to the article is that while it has references (i.e. it has a list of sources at the bottom) it does not have any footnotes (specific numbered clickable blue links showing which source belongs to which fact). For how to create automatic footnotes, see WP:Referencing for beginners. MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wuhan Textile University

A tag has been placed on Wuhan Textile University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Hawkins (ship broker)

Hello Matthew - Many thanks for reviewing and accepting my page. Much appreciated, and I wish you a very Happy New Year! John 109.153.210.199 (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not selecting Innovator's hub article

Why you didn't accept my article related to Innovator's hub article. Sudeep944 (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for rejection

Dear Sir I just want to know the reason of rejection — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arshan786 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

13:25:01, 3 January 2017 review of submission by 5.208.166.241



I added the refrences and footnotes with my best and inline citation. please advise best regards

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&oldid=758119655"