User talk:TheresNoTime

Please sign your message.

Where this user is, it is 6:32 pm, 12 August 2024 UTC [refresh].

New Page Reviewer stats

You might find some useful stuff here that I collected over the years including some earlier quarries that might give you an idea how to start: Wikipedia:New pages patrol/patrollers. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

You haven't gave proof

I asked only for proof . Can you cite how my article was considered promotional? You cannot give me proof because you cannot find fault in my article. Soon you will repent. Good bye Edson Frainlar (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

@Edson Frainlar: I understand you're upset but storming off won't help - I'm happy to talk you through why your article was deleted, but you've got to adjust your attitude a little first -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 12:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Even now you haven't shown proof. Don't tell me to change my attitude. Do you know how I created that article? I was spending three days for that article. Nearly i have edited 30 times in three days. Without visualizing all these things and without any proof how dare you delete my article? I used to speak polite. But you are getting into my nerves and forcing me to speak harshly. Anyway you don't have proof. Accept Edson Frainlar (talk) 12:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Final time I'm going to ask you to change your attitude - I didn't delete your article, and I don't see how I'm getting on your nerves. Fathers of Missionaries of Mary Immaculate was poorly referenced and seems to be promoting the subject somewhat. Would you like my help? -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 12:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

You are getting angry. Don't you have any feeling that without any proper reason you have deleted my article. You don't have the desire even to get angry. You haven't provided the proof even till. At least can you mention what are the promotional features found in that article. How can you say it is poorly referenced?I have mentioned all references that i can pick in Internet. If everything must be referenced then check for other article . Think practically. You are doing this intentionally. Who are you to tell me to change my attitude. You must change your attitude. You haven't produced me proper reasons of deleting my article. Don't speak until you give me proof on my article that it was promotional Edson Frainlar (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

• Poorly referenced: http://www.mmi-eap.com (x3) (primary source), http://www.mmiinternational.in/ (x1) (primary source), http://www.mmict.in (x1) (primary source), http://indiancatholiconline.com (x1) (secondary source)
• Promotional language: Right from the inception of DMI & MMI in South Sudan they do their full-fledged work towards all round development, The world is their mission., They march towards the father’s kingdom where everyone welcomes the gospel

@Edson Frainlar: I'm not angry, I'm disappointed that you've chosen to be so hostile about this when I've offered to help you multiple times. I hope you have a great day! -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 13:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

For being a religious congregation i think that the evidence or reference from www.indiancatholiconline.com is enough . Just for these two words 'full fledged' and 'welcomed by everyone' you have deleted it. Why don't you edit that article? I am really disappointed with many including you. Edson Frainlar (talk) 13:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Misplaced query

Hi samtar, I want to know why my page AppPerfect Corporation is deleted? The products specified there was free to use so I thought to bring them out to public notice. the page AppPerfect corporation indicates a company but it was not for promotion. Can you give me some suggestions to improve the page that you have deleted? Ranjana21 (talk) 12:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

@Ranjana21: Hi there, thanks for getting in contact! I know it must be frustrating to have your article deleted, but thank you for contacting me in a polite and civil manner - I deleted your article for two reasons. Firstly, it lacked a credible claim of significance - this might sound confusing, but the link will help explain. Secondly, and I appreciate your above explanation that the article was not for promotion, it sounded a bit too promotional. So, what can you do? I'd recommend following the instructions at the Article Wizard and creating a draft which will be reviewed by an experienced editor. Remember, if you're involved with AppPerfect you will be considered to have a Conflict of Interest and should read these helpful pointers -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 12:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)