Jump to content

User talk:ILIL: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 80: Line 80:
Stop undoes my edition, supported by the source. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/179.7.80.173|179.7.80.173]] ([[User talk:179.7.80.173#top|talk]]) 12:43, 1 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Stop undoes my edition, supported by the source. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/179.7.80.173|179.7.80.173]] ([[User talk:179.7.80.173#top|talk]]) 12:43, 1 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:[[WP:PROVEIT]] - you can't, because I already checked, and they never appear.--[[User:Ilovetopaint|Ilovetopaint]] ([[User talk:Ilovetopaint#top|talk]]) 12:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
:[[WP:PROVEIT]] - you can't, because I already checked, and they never appear.--[[User:Ilovetopaint|Ilovetopaint]] ([[User talk:Ilovetopaint#top|talk]]) 12:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
You have not checked anything, check again. You in "The Velvet Underground And Nico" also cites unreliable sources like this: "Genres that were significantly informed by the album include art rock, punk, garage, grunge, shoegaze, gothic, indie, and most other forms of alternative music . " The Independent is not a reliable source but nobody undoes your edit but you with me if you do.

Revision as of 15:34, 1 March 2017

Reference errors on 10 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Floyd

Hello. Could you create a page for "John Latham" by Pink Floyd, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.7.67.184 (talk) 02:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, when you stop reverting edits.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 10:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pink Floyd - See Emily Play.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pink Floyd - See Emily Play.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I thank you for proposing the new name at what is now the Garage punk (fusion genre) article. That turned out to be a great solution to a lot of the issues we were discussing there and at Acid rock. I also appreciate a lot of your work at the Garage rock article--you had some great ideas there too. It looks like the Garage rock article is now approaching a place that everyone can embrace. So, it seems like the whole process, no matter how difficult at times, will turn out for the best. Garagepunk66 (talk) 01:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • The United Western complex produced some of the biggest hit records of the pop era. According to the book Temples of Sound, "No other studio has won more technical excellence awards, and no studio has garnered as many Best Engineered Grammys as this complex of studios on Sunset Boulevard."
  • Cogan, Jim (2003). Temples of Sound. San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC. pp. 30–41. ISBN 0-8118-3394-1.
  • Its Studio 3 room is considered "iconic" for its use by Brian Wilson for the Beach Boys' albums Pet Sounds (1966) and Smile (unreleased).
  • Fact (July 15, 2015). "Animal Collective finish recording new album in iconic Pet Sounds studio". Factmag.

Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 14:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xb2u7Zjzc32: Are you a bot or just confused? The Beach Boys used Western between 1962 and mid 1967. They then used Wally Heider's Los Angeles studio between late 1967 and 1969.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 16:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Artpop.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —IB [ Poke ] 05:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I give up and I get it, but please, you cannot block me or ban me from editing. I am not trying to antagonize you and others, be disruptive or start editing conflicts. Sorry if I'm being persistent to you. I can't find any sources for the genre, since it is a pain for me to find better ones. Reply if you may. Aki (talk · contributions). 14:02 (UTC), February 22, 2017 (Wednesday).

Well, the reason why I'm also asking not to block me is because I wanna retain my status as a "block-free" user, fix grammar and punctuation, as well as edit other articles, so please? I am already waiting for you to reply and tell me about the reasons why do you always revert my edits in electropop.

Hi, I've had to revert your split of the templates, as the single template approach was agreed by consensus at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 27#Template:Pink Floyd singles. --Rob Sinden (talk) 13:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

Hello, Ilovetopaint. When you changed Adult-oriented rock into a disambiguation page, you may not have been aware of WP:FIXDABLINKS, which says:

When creating disambiguation pages, fix all resulting mis-directed links.
Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, to move an existing disambiguation page to that name, or to redirect that name to a disambiguation page), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.

It would be a great help if you would check the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to "Adult-oriented rock" and fix them to take readers to the correct article. Thanks. R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the WP:LISTVERIFY tag you added, all statements in the list need a citation. Mostly out of curiosity, which statement on this list page do you think needs verification? 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All of them (WP:LSC).--Ilovetopaint (talk) 22:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Piper At The Gates Of Dawn

Why you undoes my edition? You are a unfair user. The article is supported by the source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.7.89.26 (talk) 02:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because it doesn't actually say any of that in the source.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 02:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But it's supported by the source, my source say "alternative music forms" it say that. You should respect my edit please.

I'll respect your edit if you can quote - verbatim - in which source the phrases "post-punk", "punk", and "indie rock" are used in reference to Piper.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 03:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop undoes my edition, supported by the source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.7.80.173 (talk) 12:43, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROVEIT - you can't, because I already checked, and they never appear.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 12:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have not checked anything, check again. You in "The Velvet Underground And Nico" also cites unreliable sources like this: "Genres that were significantly informed by the album include art rock, punk, garage, grunge, shoegaze, gothic, indie, and most other forms of alternative music . " The Independent is not a reliable source but nobody undoes your edit but you with me if you do.