Jump to content

Talk:Stanford International Bank: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 186.88.245.101 - "→‎Lacks, subsidiaries in other nations.: new section"
→‎References:: new section
Line 37: Line 37:


Added entry, subsidiaries in other nations: No known information (to be added). <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/186.88.245.101|186.88.245.101]] ([[User talk:186.88.245.101#top|talk]]) 23:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Added entry, subsidiaries in other nations: No known information (to be added). <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/186.88.245.101|186.88.245.101]] ([[User talk:186.88.245.101#top|talk]]) 23:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== References: ==

Removing references that are not available.:

1. Not found.
2. Available.
3. Not found.
4. Available.
5. Not found.
6. Avaibable.
7. Not found.
8. Not found.
9. Not found.
10. Not found.
11. Not found.
12. Not found.
13. Available.
14. Available.
15. Not found.
16. Antigua Regulatory Comission website is a good reference, even though that page does not exist.
17. Not found.
18. Not found.
19. Not found.
20. FRP advisory is a reasonable reference.
21. Not found.
22. Available.
23. Not found.
24. FRP website.
25. SIB liquidators website, VERY important reference, but alas, not mentioned in the wiki page.
26. Not found.
27. SiB liquidators site.

Lots of dead references, WITH IP to direct to.

You should make a ruling where NEWS clipping references, html placed into, are not valid references (which overal they never are).

I'll clean this up during the week. :/

Revision as of 00:40, 20 April 2017

offered Certificate of deposit (CDs) at rates consistently higher than those available from banks in the United States.

There is absolutely no proof nor references concerning ' significantly ' higher, therefore that is a blatant lie.

A certificate of deposit, as per their bank, is a deposit, bonded, where the individual fixes their money/capital for a determant time period, IE, a savings deposit, and not an investment. This coinage was in United States Dollars and not in U.K. pounds, which as usual in times of War, becomes the cause of a bicker about that same.

The really silly instance in all this, is that there is no reason at all to NOT provide support to the clients, 4 billion U.S.D being a drop in the ocean, especially in consideration of an average/median, of 40k per individual overal, all sections, expended for a War effort/afront.

4,000,000,000/40,000 100,000 individuals, in pure wages, not considering the equipment and overhead, which overal reach a factor of 3.

Merely, 33 thousand individuals.

Removed the statement considering ' significantly ' higher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 22:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subsidiaries in Venezuela and Mexico

Banks in a nation, fall under the localized licensing procedures. That is, even though it has the name, 'abc' bank, it is the nation where it is placed from which they obtain a license to operate, and not anywhere else.

Added, in bolivares, for Venezuela, and in mexican coinage, for mexico. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 22:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changed headings, Venezuela and Mexico are two distinct affairs.

Seperated the Venezuelan and Mexico heading, the banks in question not having to do with other aspects of regulation, those for example in Aruba, or Peru, Chile and other nations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 23:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Improbable

Changed the statement to, from between a 0.5 to 1.5% higher than a United States standard United States Government Bonded Certificat of Deposit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 23:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lacks, subsidiaries in other nations.

Added entry, subsidiaries in other nations: No known information (to be added). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.245.101 (talk) 23:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References:

Removing references that are not available.:

1. Not found. 2. Available. 3. Not found. 4. Available. 5. Not found. 6. Avaibable. 7. Not found. 8. Not found. 9. Not found. 10. Not found. 11. Not found. 12. Not found. 13. Available. 14. Available. 15. Not found. 16. Antigua Regulatory Comission website is a good reference, even though that page does not exist. 17. Not found. 18. Not found. 19. Not found. 20. FRP advisory is a reasonable reference. 21. Not found. 22. Available. 23. Not found. 24. FRP website. 25. SIB liquidators website, VERY important reference, but alas, not mentioned in the wiki page. 26. Not found. 27. SiB liquidators site.

Lots of dead references, WITH IP to direct to.

You should make a ruling where NEWS clipping references, html placed into, are not valid references (which overal they never are).

I'll clean this up during the week. :/