Jump to content

User talk:Devopam: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 71: Line 71:
Hello Devopam, Thanks for reviewing my proposed article. I am a bit puzzled how to follow up on the reasons for your non-acceptance. Your feedback was that the "submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". I think I have only used reliable sources and I have accounted for all of them in footnotes. The fact that they are not readily available online, but in hard copy in libraries, does not mean that the references are unreliable, in my view. You also mention "Please help with WP:ELNO and preferably an infobox with a picture." I changed the two online references. Hopefully they are as expected. And I added a picture. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mockridge13|Mockridge13]] ([[User talk:Mockridge13#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mockridge13|contribs]]) 11:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Hello Devopam, Thanks for reviewing my proposed article. I am a bit puzzled how to follow up on the reasons for your non-acceptance. Your feedback was that the "submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". I think I have only used reliable sources and I have accounted for all of them in footnotes. The fact that they are not readily available online, but in hard copy in libraries, does not mean that the references are unreliable, in my view. You also mention "Please help with WP:ELNO and preferably an infobox with a picture." I changed the two online references. Hopefully they are as expected. And I added a picture. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mockridge13|Mockridge13]] ([[User talk:Mockridge13#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mockridge13|contribs]]) 11:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:{{yo|Mockridge13}} You got me. This article was promising. Hope you don't mind me doing all the editing that I ended up doing. [[User:Devopam|Devopam]] ([[User talk:Devopam#top|talk]]) 13:53, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
:{{yo|Mockridge13}} You got me. This article was promising. Hope you don't mind me doing all the editing that I ended up doing. [[User:Devopam|Devopam]] ([[User talk:Devopam#top|talk]]) 13:53, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

== 19:29:18, 6 June 2017 review of submission by Kengillett2017 ==
{{Lafc|username=Kengillett2017|ts=19:29:18, 6 June 2017|declined=Draft:Anthony_K._Tjan}}


Hello Devopam,

I noticed that you rejected the draft of the entry for Anthony K. Tjan. The entry lists several notable sources, including press articles and television placements.
I am curious to know if the entry was rejected because there were not ENOUGH sources, or because you don't consider these sources to be RELEVANT.
Also, I would love if you could let me know what needs to be added/replaced/improved if I decide to resubmit the entry.

Thank you very much for your help. Looking forward to hearing back from you.

Best,

Revision as of 19:29, 6 June 2017


Devopam

Contribs —— Home —— Talk —— Email —— Identity —— Usercheck





In the news

Ismail Haniyeh in September 2022
Ismail Haniyeh
Archives
/Archive1 —— /Archive2 —— /Archive3 —— /Archive4 —— /Archive5 —— /Archive6 —— /Archive7 —— /Archive8 —— /Archive9

Be polite, assume good faith and avoid personal attacks.

Sign and date your posts typing four tildes (~~~~)

Put new text under old text. Click here to leave me a new message.












why delete Mabrur Rashid Bannah

Mabrur Rashid Bannah page why deletion

@Ismailim: I did not delete, I opened a discussion for AfD with reasons stated here at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mabrur_Rashid_Bannah. Please feel free to improve the article, or contest the deletion stating your POV. I am not a proponent of outright deletion, and look for if curation is feasible. Devopam (talk) 04:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

09:53:21, 26 May 2017 review of submission by Abhijeet 21


I am requesting for re-review because all the references are taken from news headlines. And news headlines are notable sources of information then why this article is being rejected again and again. Tell me the issue with the references.

@Abhijeet 21: please have a look at the comments posted on the article. That will help you identify the issues and subsequently fix. Devopam (talk) 11:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14:01:06, 26 May 2017 review of submission by Cmm642


Hi there, I just wanted to clarify the reason my draft was rejected. Sources provided were reputable news organizations. Would it be possible to tell me exactly which one is causing a problem? Also, how should I be sourcing "DOB, Early life and Personal life"? I have been using several other Wiki bio pages as precedent, which do not include sourcing for many of these items (ie: Jamie Gorelick, Andrew Tobias, Jason Rae). Would you mind giving me some guidance on what content I should remove to get this submission approved? William Derrough is the only member of the Democratic National Committee's "key people" who does not have a live Wikipedia page and I'd love to know how others succeeded in getting their posts approved. FINALLY, MAKE SURE TO CLICK THE "Save page" BUTTON BELOW OR YOUR REQUEST WILL BE LOST!!!-->}}

13:18:50, 30 May 2017 review of submission by Milan Reiter


Hey Devopam,

thanks for your advice on my first article at the help desk section. I edited the article for Uwe Marx and followed the guidelines for references and citation. Maybe you can take a look at my changes. I would really appreciate it.

Take care! Milan Reiter

@Milan Reiter: article is in a much better shape than earlier. Appreciate the due diligence. Could you please address the following:
  • Please add some news coverage on the patents. I wasn't able to find it on a cursory look.
  • See WP:ELNO. Remove all that can be , per guidelines, else retain.
  • Few of the Media coverage articles should ideally be a strong reference indeed (e.g journal summaries)

Once done, please ping back, and I will be more than happy to be of help. Devopam (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :@Devopam:,

- I added some sources for the patents - I deleted some of the external links to his webpages because that is apparently against the wiki guidelines - I talked to the user Maproom and he recommended that I should delete the media coverage unless I can cite them in the article, so I already did that before I saw your response. A few of them are listed in the reference section tho.Hope that is not a bad thing.

Thanks, Milan Reiter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milan Reiter (talkcontribs) 16:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Submitted article Hertha Natzler

Hello Devopam, Thanks for reviewing my proposed article. I am a bit puzzled how to follow up on the reasons for your non-acceptance. Your feedback was that the "submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources". I think I have only used reliable sources and I have accounted for all of them in footnotes. The fact that they are not readily available online, but in hard copy in libraries, does not mean that the references are unreliable, in my view. You also mention "Please help with WP:ELNO and preferably an infobox with a picture." I changed the two online references. Hopefully they are as expected. And I added a picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mockridge13 (talkcontribs) 11:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mockridge13: You got me. This article was promising. Hope you don't mind me doing all the editing that I ended up doing. Devopam (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19:29:18, 6 June 2017 review of submission by Kengillett2017


Hello Devopam,

I noticed that you rejected the draft of the entry for Anthony K. Tjan. The entry lists several notable sources, including press articles and television placements. I am curious to know if the entry was rejected because there were not ENOUGH sources, or because you don't consider these sources to be RELEVANT. Also, I would love if you could let me know what needs to be added/replaced/improved if I decide to resubmit the entry.

Thank you very much for your help. Looking forward to hearing back from you.

Best,