Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paraduin: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Paraduin: comment
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Delete''' as not notable hoax. --[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie|talk]]) 12:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as not notable hoax. --[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie|talk]]) 12:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - non-notable, sourcing sucks, possible hoax, created by COI/POV editor. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 13:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - non-notable, sourcing sucks, possible hoax, created by COI/POV editor. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 13:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
*{{comment}} While I am aware that some people consider [[micronation]]s a hoax, that really doesn't matter here. Many hoaxes have a page on Wikipedia, as do many micronations. Paraduin's activities, meanwhile, are very real, and my COI has been properly declared. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 15:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:11, 19 June 2017

Paraduin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable 'micronation.' A WP:BEFORE search indicates virtually no coverage in independent, third-party reliable sources, [1]. Only sources are WP:PRIMARY, and as such lack the required persistence and depth of coverage required to pass WP:N. Incidentally, per WP:VNT, this is verging, I think on a WP:HOAX; at least, WP:A11 ('Obviously made up by creator, and no claim of significance') may apply. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 11:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]