Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paraduin: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Paraduin: comment |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete''' as not notable hoax. --[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie|talk]]) 12:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as not notable hoax. --[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie|talk]]) 12:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - non-notable, sourcing sucks, possible hoax, created by COI/POV editor. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 13:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - non-notable, sourcing sucks, possible hoax, created by COI/POV editor. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 13:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
*{{comment}} While I am aware that some people consider [[micronation]]s a hoax, that really doesn't matter here. Many hoaxes have a page on Wikipedia, as do many micronations. Paraduin's activities, meanwhile, are very real, and my COI has been properly declared. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 15:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:11, 19 June 2017
- Paraduin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable 'micronation.' A WP:BEFORE search indicates virtually no coverage in independent, third-party reliable sources, [1]. Only sources are WP:PRIMARY, and as such lack the required persistence and depth of coverage required to pass WP:N. Incidentally, per WP:VNT, this is verging, I think on a WP:HOAX; at least, WP:A11 ('Obviously made up by creator, and no claim of significance') may apply. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 11:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Most peculiar sourcing - seems to consist principally of pieces in the homegrown propaganda bulletin, mixed up with blogs and what appears to be the Dutch Deletionpedia equivalent (?). And do my eyes deceive me, or are several of these pieces authored by the editor who created this article? This is a miasma of COI and makes no credible claim for notability. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as not notable hoax. --Yopie (talk) 12:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable, sourcing sucks, possible hoax, created by COI/POV editor. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: While I am aware that some people consider micronations a hoax, that really doesn't matter here. Many hoaxes have a page on Wikipedia, as do many micronations. Paraduin's activities, meanwhile, are very real, and my COI has been properly declared. Guido den Broeder (talk) 15:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)