Jump to content

Talk:Circumzenithal arc: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Stub uprated to Start using AWB
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{physics|class=start|importance=low}}
{{physics|class=start|importance=low}}
{{meteorology|class=start|importance=low}}
{{meteorology|class=start|importance=low}}

== "Artificial circumzenithal arc" chapter is misleading ==
The resulting arc of the experiment is: Bent the wrong way (open towards the "sun", not the zenith) and colours are in inversed order (blue nearest to the "sun"). I think what has to be considered is that the real arc is formed from crystals at many different positions (not only different orientations). The colours are then swapped in their order as the light rays from different drystals cross, just like the rays from different water drops in a rainbow. The shape is a bit more complicated. As far as I could reproduce it using four glasses, their arcs cross at some point (where the observer stands and looks up). Glasses placed at the outside have to be moved towards the observer/zenith so that their arcs cross at the same point as the inner glasses. Therefore you get an arc bent around the zenith, as the glasses/ crystals you see have to be moved on a circle around the zenith to make them visible at the point of observation.I '''think''' this is how the arc is formed. The single glass method is definitely not a complete model, I think this should atleast be mentioned somewhere.
[[Special:Contributions/93.216.41.252|93.216.41.252]] ([[User talk:93.216.41.252|talk]]) 18:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:55, 25 June 2017

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPhysics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconWeather Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Artificial circumzenithal arc" chapter is misleading

The resulting arc of the experiment is: Bent the wrong way (open towards the "sun", not the zenith) and colours are in inversed order (blue nearest to the "sun"). I think what has to be considered is that the real arc is formed from crystals at many different positions (not only different orientations). The colours are then swapped in their order as the light rays from different drystals cross, just like the rays from different water drops in a rainbow. The shape is a bit more complicated. As far as I could reproduce it using four glasses, their arcs cross at some point (where the observer stands and looks up). Glasses placed at the outside have to be moved towards the observer/zenith so that their arcs cross at the same point as the inner glasses. Therefore you get an arc bent around the zenith, as the glasses/ crystals you see have to be moved on a circle around the zenith to make them visible at the point of observation.I think this is how the arc is formed. The single glass method is definitely not a complete model, I think this should atleast be mentioned somewhere. 93.216.41.252 (talk) 18:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]