User talk:Ryulong

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Archives
February 2006 – June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006

---

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion. --Ryūlóng

• For any new users or anonymous users who cannot edit this page due to actions by other users that lead to the semi-protection of this page, please leave me a message here, and I will get back to you as soon as I can. Ryūlóng 18:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

---

Italy (feel free to clarify this)

The biggest thing is this - everyone was centered on our actions and no consideration was given to the page naming (and original changing last year that Taalo pointed out). Similar situations abound in the military - where my soldiers do the wrong thing but the overall intentions are clear. In that case, yes, they are disciplined - while I correct the situation myself. I didn't see that happening. And I didn't appreciate the wording used against me. Somehow things can always be twisted - like the 'wikistalking' comment. Don't read into things - because accusing someone of something (like someone calling an editor a 'vandal' because of a topic the person ran into) is libel until proven true. Have a great day, and hope to run into you in a more civil manner soon. Rarelibra 21:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

I apologize for what happened, but things like these should not occur on Wikipedia. Edit warring, and slinging insults (myself included it seems), but we had all tried to tell you the right means of performing the moves, and as I said, I will look into South Tyrol and the other places and see what needs to be done. Ryūlóng 21:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy delete

You put a speedy delete tag/template on Talk:Oyster River High School. Doesn't this usually go on the main page? John Broughton | Talk 21:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Nope. The CSD G1 criteria holds for all pages, even talk. Thus if a talk page is nonsense, we can delete it without removing the involved article. I hope that helps. alphaChimp^(talk) 22:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that helps. I do find it odd, though - I would have thought just blanking the talk page would suffice. Anyway, the talk page is gone, the article remains, and I'll continue amusing myself by reverting vandalism that the vandalbot misses. John Broughton | Talk 23:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Zeo Rangers Pic

What's wrong with having my picture on that page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .

It's not the Zeo Rangers, and it's sourced to a message board/fansite. Ryūlóng 03:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean that's not the Zeo Rangers. Those are the Zeo Rangers! And who cares if it comes from a fansite, it's still a website! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .

They're the Ohrangers, from the original, and the image is not necessary. Ryūlóng 03:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Even if it's not necessary, it doesn't hurt to have a picture of the Zeo Rangers. It's like you remove everything people add to a Power Rangers page and you're getting pretty annoying. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .

I know, a picture of them would be all right, it's just that it should be one that comes either as a screenshot or something from solely American footage. Also, stop removing the {{orfud}} tags from those images, please? It's getting pretty annoying to keep having to do so. Also, sign your posts. Ryūlóng 03:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

No, I'm not going to stop removing the {{orfud}} tags from the images because they are MY images and they are not on your Power Ranger pages so you have nothing to do with them. Also, I don't know how to sign my posts and I don't want to take the time to do so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs) .

They are not your images. They belong to TOEI (and Disney). And you sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Ryūlóng 03:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm New

Hi, I'm new to wikipedia and I joined the Vanadilism Removal Unit. I saw that when I was trying to revert vandalism I got confused and messed things up a little bit. Thanks for helping me clear that up. Also, thanks for leaving a message on my talk page with help to get me started. Rubikfreak 04:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem at all. Ryūlóng 04:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Just wanted to thank you for your help with User:Mykungfu. You did a ton of work just while I was posting a request for help on AN/I. I'm willing to do what I can to prevent this guy from disrupting things further, but I can't do it myself AND defend myself from the bogus allegations he likes to throw around. | Mr. Darcy talk 04:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Pakistani nationalism

Thanks for your revert of S Seagal's vandalism. I fear that this will continue with him unless action is taken. Could you plz mediate?Hkelkar 04:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I've given him a 3RR warning. If he repeats, list him here. Ryūlóng 04:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Well he might wait a day and start over. I think a confirmed non-partisan user is desperately needed to mediate matters there and you seem to be a great candidate for this. Please consider spending some time on this.I'd be ever so grateful.Hkelkar 05:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I would, but I'm in school, and I should desperately be working on a laboratory report that is due in eight hours. If he repeats his edits (a violation of WP:3RR), do not revert him, but report him to WP:AN3. Ryūlóng 05:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

OK sorry to bother you at this time. Should you become free then please do drop by the Talk:Pakistani nationalism page and help keep the wolves at bay, so to speak :-).Hkelkar 05:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Add: he has brought another user in user:BhaiSaab to re-vandalize the article.Hkelkar 05:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I doubt it's that. Ryūlóng 05:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism on User:Lahiru k

Thank you, for your acts against vandalism. Lahiru_k 04:53 4 October 2006(UTC)

Vandalism Bindi Irwin Article.

I am the anonymous user you posted the information you called vandalism. Vandalism is defined by wikipedia as "any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia" I was making an additional to the article which has to say on the issue: Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia. For example, adding a personal opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated. In short what I did was not vandalism. Vandalism is accoeding to wikipeia "the replacement of existing text with obscenities, page blanking, or the insertion of bad jokes or other nonsense."--Sovietcollector 05:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, for some reason it had been reverted prior, but I have now fixed it up a bit. Ryūlóng 05:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I was just thought it was something important that belonged in the article.--Sovietcollector 05:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)