Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adda52: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
C
Uyarafath (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
According to Wikipedia guidelines, complete notability criteria is met by this subject. If not, Please explain. Thank you.[[User:Uyarafath|Uyarafath]] ([[User talk:Uyarafath|talk]]) 12:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia guidelines, complete notability criteria is met by this subject. If not, Please explain. Thank you.[[User:Uyarafath|Uyarafath]] ([[User talk:Uyarafath|talk]]) 12:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
:You only addressed half of my comment. I also said that the rest are routine announcements and brief mentions. If you feel that these references establish notability, please state which reference is from a reliable source and establishes [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]. I went through them all and cannot find one. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 16:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
:You only addressed half of my comment. I also said that the rest are routine announcements and brief mentions. If you feel that these references establish notability, please state which reference is from a reliable source and establishes [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]. I went through them all and cannot find one. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 16:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
::Hi [[User:CNMall41]], I really would like to know. Could you please direct me to any of Wikipedia article about a company and the references which broadly talk about those companies. So, I will somehow understand what exactly mean 'core mentioning'. kindly show me few Wiki articles about companies and those references. So, at least I correct myself. It will be great from you. Thank you[[User:Uyarafath|Uyarafath]] ([[User talk:Uyarafath|talk]]) 04:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:24, 23 August 2017

Adda52 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as references, I am finding that most are coming from blogs, poker websites, or other unreliable sources. The rest are routine announcements or brief mentions. Also related to AfD for Adda52rummy. According to one announcement, it is now owned by Delta Corp Limited which could be a viable redirect. Currently, it fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. CNMall41 (talk) 17:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this probably should be bundled with the Adda52rummy AfD before this is voted on. ☆ Bri (talk) 07:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Don't Delete - User:CNMall41 has said " I am finding that most are coming from blogs, poker websites, or other unreliable sources.". I would like to clarify that there are 20 references given in the list.

A) Ref. 1 to 4, 19 are poker news website(but independent sources, those websites is not run by Adda52)
B) Ref. 5 - Scroll.in, Ref. 6 - vccircle.in, Ref. 8 - Indiatimes, Ref. 9 - Catchnews, Ref. 10 - Indiatimes Ref. 11 - Business standard, Ref. 12 - The Hindu Business line, Ref. 13 - The HansInida, Ref. 17 - Zee news India, Ref. 18 -Siasat, Ref. 20 - livemint news
C) 2 references from primary sources & 1 reference from others (But not just blog).
Now, please clarify me which are blogs & other unreliable sources. In (B), You can see many reliable reputed news sources. If I am wrong, please clarify.
According to Wikipedia guidelines, complete notability criteria is met by this subject. If not, Please explain. Thank you.Uyarafath (talk) 12:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You only addressed half of my comment. I also said that the rest are routine announcements and brief mentions. If you feel that these references establish notability, please state which reference is from a reliable source and establishes WP:CORPDEPTH. I went through them all and cannot find one. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi User:CNMall41, I really would like to know. Could you please direct me to any of Wikipedia article about a company and the references which broadly talk about those companies. So, I will somehow understand what exactly mean 'core mentioning'. kindly show me few Wiki articles about companies and those references. So, at least I correct myself. It will be great from you. Thank youUyarafath (talk) 04:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]