Jump to content

User:AristonAstuanax: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
{{user Metal}}
{{user Metal}}
{{user collstudent minor|Philosophy|Music}}
{{user collstudent minor|Philosophy|Music}}
{{user oxon}}
{{userbox|black|white|[[Image:Mortarboard.jpg|40px]]| This user studies at the '''[[University of Tulsa]]'''.}}
{{userbox|black|white|[[Image:Mortarboard.jpg|40px]]| This user studies at the '''[[University of Tulsa]]'''.}}
{{user Dominican Order}}
{{user Dominican Order}}

Revision as of 21:33, 7 October 2006

Template:User beer


Template:User Belgian beer


(Remember kids, it's not drinking, it's research!)

This user plays the cello.
orchThis user plays in an orchestra.
This user appreciates progressive rock.
This user enjoys
heavy metal music.
This user is an undergraduate student majoring in Philosophy and minoring in Music.
Oxon.This user is an Oxonian.
This user studies at the University of Tulsa.
OPThis user studies at, or is an alumnus of, a Dominican Order school.

Template:User bored reasons








  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.