Jump to content

Knik Arm Bridge: Difference between revisions

Add links
Coordinates: 61°17′N 149°54′W / 61.28°N 149.9°W / 61.28; -149.9
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
KolbertBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
1,166,042 edits
Rescuing 11 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.5.2)
Line 71: Line 71:
The '''Knik Arm Bridge''' is a proposed 1.74-mile bridge across [[Cook Inlet]]'s [[Knik Arm]] to link the two fastest growing parts of [[Alaska]] – [[Anchorage]] and the [[Matanuska-Susitna Borough]].
The '''Knik Arm Bridge''' is a proposed 1.74-mile bridge across [[Cook Inlet]]'s [[Knik Arm]] to link the two fastest growing parts of [[Alaska]] – [[Anchorage]] and the [[Matanuska-Susitna Borough]].


The project consists of a 1.74-mile-long bridge with 18 miles of connector roads, including on and off ramps, and a $50 million cut and cover tunnel under Government Hill.<ref name="knikarmbridge.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.knikarmbridge.com/Tech_Reports/NewReports/Government%20Hill%20Roadway%20Structure%20Alts.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2014-03-17 |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304032924/http://www.knikarmbridge.com/Tech_Reports/NewReports/Government%20Hill%20Roadway%20Structure%20Alts.pdf |archivedate=2016-03-04 |df= }}</ref> Current cost estimates are between $700 and $800 million.<ref name="knikarmbridge.com"/>
The project consists of a 1.74-mile-long bridge with 18 miles of connector roads, including on and off ramps, and a $50 million cut and cover tunnel under Government Hill.<ref name="knikarmbridge.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.knikarmbridge.com/Tech_Reports/NewReports/Government%20Hill%20Roadway%20Structure%20Alts.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2014-03-17 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304032924/http://www.knikarmbridge.com/Tech_Reports/NewReports/Government%20Hill%20Roadway%20Structure%20Alts.pdf |archivedate=2016-03-04 |df= }}</ref> Current cost estimates are between $700 and $800 million.<ref name="knikarmbridge.com"/>


Proponents say the crossing would provide access to much-needed residential, commercial and industrial land; create jobs; reduce the cost of transportation to Interior Alaska and the North Slope; lessen carbon emissions and provide an alternative transportation route out of Anchorage.
Proponents say the crossing would provide access to much-needed residential, commercial and industrial land; create jobs; reduce the cost of transportation to Interior Alaska and the North Slope; lessen carbon emissions and provide an alternative transportation route out of Anchorage.
Line 78: Line 78:


==Concept==
==Concept==
The idea of a bridge or causeway across [[Knik Arm]] was first envisioned in 1923 by [[Alaska Railroad]] engineers looking for a more efficient route to Alaska's interior.<ref name="http://knikarmbridge.com/history.html">{{cite web|url=http://knikarmbridge.com/history.html |title=KABATA History |publisher=Knikarmbridge.com |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref> In 1955 a group of Anchorage businessmen studied it again.<ref name="http://knikarmbridge.com/history.html"/> At that time, the cost estimate was $25 million ($194 million in 2008 dollars). The development of [[Seward's Success, Alaska|Seward's Success]] in the late-1960s called for the development of both an [[aerial tramway]] and [[monorail]] to span the Knik Arm.<ref name="November 3, 2002">{{cite news
The idea of a bridge or causeway across [[Knik Arm]] was first envisioned in 1923 by [[Alaska Railroad]] engineers looking for a more efficient route to Alaska's interior.<ref name="http://knikarmbridge.com/history.html">{{cite web |url=http://knikarmbridge.com/history.html |title=KABATA History |publisher=Knikarmbridge.com |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120521012412/http://www.knikarmbridge.com/history.html |archivedate=2012-05-21 |df= }}</ref> In 1955 a group of Anchorage businessmen studied it again.<ref name="http://knikarmbridge.com/history.html"/> At that time, the cost estimate was $25 million ($194 million in 2008 dollars). The development of [[Seward's Success, Alaska|Seward's Success]] in the late-1960s called for the development of both an [[aerial tramway]] and [[monorail]] to span the Knik Arm.<ref name="November 3, 2002">{{cite news
| last =Porco
| last =Porco
| first =Peter
| first =Peter
Line 85: Line 85:
| page =B3
| page =B3
| date =November 3, 2002
| date =November 3, 2002
| accessdate =January 27, 2010}}</ref> The Knik Arm Bridge And Toll Authority or KABATA, created by the [[Alaska Legislature]] in 2003 to develop a method of construction, financing, design, operation and maintenance of the bridge.<ref name="http://knikarmbridge.com/about.html">{{cite web|url=http://knikarmbridge.com/about.html |title=KABATA About Us |publisher=Knikarmbridge.com |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref>
| accessdate =January 27, 2010}}</ref> The Knik Arm Bridge And Toll Authority or KABATA, created by the [[Alaska Legislature]] in 2003 to develop a method of construction, financing, design, operation and maintenance of the bridge.<ref name="http://knikarmbridge.com/about.html">{{cite web |url=http://knikarmbridge.com/about.html |title=KABATA About Us |publisher=Knikarmbridge.com |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120521020520/http://www.knikarmbridge.com/about.html |archivedate=2012-05-21 |df= }}</ref>


Since that time KABATA has completed the final EIS, obtained a "build" Record of Decision from FHWA and moved into preconstruction activities including submitting permit application and purchasing right-of-way needed for a cut and cover tunnel under Government Hill.
Since that time KABATA has completed the final EIS, obtained a "build" Record of Decision from FHWA and moved into preconstruction activities including submitting permit application and purchasing right-of-way needed for a cut and cover tunnel under Government Hill.
Line 100: Line 100:
Original funding for the Knik Arm Bridge was provided by an earmark written by Don Young. The same bill funded the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere."
Original funding for the Knik Arm Bridge was provided by an earmark written by Don Young. The same bill funded the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere."


The Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority (KABATA) came under scrutiny in September 2006 when reports surfaced that its lead staff had received 20% to 30% raises at an executive session in August, raising to a typical salary of $130,000 per year. KABATA produced a 14-minute video which cost $57,490 including airtime.<ref>{{cite web|last=Christiansen |first=Scott |url=http://www.anchoragepress.com/articles/2010/07/28/news/doc4c50d0728b294448065833.txt |title=Just slightly north to the future - Anchorage Press: Anchorage Press News |publisher=Anchorage Press |date=2010-07-28 |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref>
The Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority (KABATA) came under scrutiny in September 2006 when reports surfaced that its lead staff had received 20% to 30% raises at an executive session in August, raising to a typical salary of $130,000 per year. KABATA produced a 14-minute video which cost $57,490 including airtime.<ref>{{cite web |last=Christiansen |first=Scott |url=http://www.anchoragepress.com/articles/2010/07/28/news/doc4c50d0728b294448065833.txt |title=Just slightly north to the future - Anchorage Press: Anchorage Press News |publisher=Anchorage Press |date=2010-07-28 |accessdate=2012-11-02 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://archive.is/20120730025505/http://www.anchoragepress.com/articles/2010/07/28/news/doc4c50d0728b294448065833.txt |archivedate=2012-07-30 |df= }}</ref>


Former Governor [[Sarah Palin]] has been criticized for supporting the project, with one attorney for an environmentalist group suggesting she only supports it because it serves the area that she comes from.<ref name="palinotherbridge">{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-16-Palin-bridge_N.htm |title=Palin supports $600 million 'other' bridge project |work=USA Today | date=September 16, 2008 | accessdate=May 7, 2010}}</ref> Palin's running mate in the 2008 presidential election [[John McCain]] opposes the bridge, calling the bill funding it and the [[Gravina Island Bridge]] a "monstrosity" that was "terrifying in its fiscal consequences".<ref name="palinotherbridge"/>
Former Governor [[Sarah Palin]] has been criticized for supporting the project, with one attorney for an environmentalist group suggesting she only supports it because it serves the area that she comes from.<ref name="palinotherbridge">{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-16-Palin-bridge_N.htm |title=Palin supports $600 million 'other' bridge project |work=USA Today | date=September 16, 2008 | accessdate=May 7, 2010}}</ref> Palin's running mate in the 2008 presidential election [[John McCain]] opposes the bridge, calling the bill funding it and the [[Gravina Island Bridge]] a "monstrosity" that was "terrifying in its fiscal consequences".<ref name="palinotherbridge"/>
Line 106: Line 106:
In 2011, the city of Anchorage filed a lawsuit to force the federal government to drop its green light for the controversial Knik Arm bridge project, arguing that it would hurt the Port of Anchorage.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.adn.com/2011/07/07/1956920/city-wants-ok-for-knik-bridge.html#storylink=cpy |title=KNIK ARM: Muni says it will hurt port, wants federal OK dropped.|publisher=Anchorage Daily News |date=2011-07-07 |accessdate=2013-06-21}}</ref>
In 2011, the city of Anchorage filed a lawsuit to force the federal government to drop its green light for the controversial Knik Arm bridge project, arguing that it would hurt the Port of Anchorage.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.adn.com/2011/07/07/1956920/city-wants-ok-for-knik-bridge.html#storylink=cpy |title=KNIK ARM: Muni says it will hurt port, wants federal OK dropped.|publisher=Anchorage Daily News |date=2011-07-07 |accessdate=2013-06-21}}</ref>


Some people, including activist and investor Jamie Kenworthy, believe that the toll revenue estimates provided to rationalize construction are unrealistic, as well.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.adn.com/2010/03/15/1184860/knik-arm-bridge-estimates-just.html |title=Knik Arm Bridge Estimates Just Don't Add Up.|publisher=Anchorage Daily News |date=2010-03-15 |accessdate=2013-06-21}}</ref>
Some people, including activist and investor Jamie Kenworthy, believe that the toll revenue estimates provided to rationalize construction are unrealistic, as well.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.adn.com/2010/03/15/1184860/knik-arm-bridge-estimates-just.html |title=Knik Arm Bridge Estimates Just Don't Add Up. |publisher=Anchorage Daily News |date=2010-03-15 |accessdate=2013-06-21 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140318015447/http://www.adn.com/2010/03/15/1184860/knik-arm-bridge-estimates-just.html |archivedate=2014-03-18 |df= }}</ref>


Because of all of the concerns, the demise of the project has been expected for years.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.taxpayer.net/library/article/final-days-of-don-youngs-way |title=Final Days of Don Young's Way? |publisher=Taxpayers for Common Sense |date=2008-06-09 |accessdate=2013-06-21}}</ref>
Because of all of the concerns, the demise of the project has been expected for years.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.taxpayer.net/library/article/final-days-of-don-youngs-way |title=Final Days of Don Young's Way? |publisher=Taxpayers for Common Sense |date=2008-06-09 |accessdate=2013-06-21}}</ref>


==Support==
==Support==
Supporters of the bridge believe that the bridge would allow the growing population of the region to expand into the Point MacKenzie area.<ref name="http://www.knikarmbridge.com/documents/KABATASurveyReport-Final.pdf">{{cite web|url=http://www.knikarmbridge.com/documents/KABATASurveyReport-Final.pdf |title=Dittman Survey|date=December 2011|page=18|publisher=Knikarmbridge.com|accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref> The approach road and connectors, along with the bridge total about 10 miles from Downtown Anchorage, about the same commuting distance as other available land in Anchorage. The residents of the Matanuska/Susitna Valley currently have only a single road to get to and from Anchorage and points south and Anchorage residents only have a single route to all points north. The [[George Parks Highway|Parks Highway]] which runs through [[Willow, Alaska]], [[Houston, Alaska]] and Wasilla, joins the [[Glenn Highway]], which continues along a strip of land between [[Chugach State Park]] and the military bases north of Anchorage. The Knik Arm Bridge and connecting roads would provide a secondary north/south roadway to Wasilla. There is however concern that the only paved connecting road on the Matanuska/Susitna Borough side of the bridge, which is the Knik Goose Bay Road, is presently overcapacity and listed as one of the four most dangerous roads in the state.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stwdplng/hwysafety/safety_corridors.shtml |title=Safety Corridor, Alaska Highway Safety Office, Transportation & Public Facilities, State of Alaska |publisher=Dot.state.ak.us |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref> The commuting distance for the vast majority of all existing residents of the Matanuska/Susitna Valley would not be lessened by taking the Knik Arm Bridge, a factor that Bridge critics say make KABATA's current revenue forecasts from the Bridge Tolls overstated.<ref>{{cite web|author=Andrew Halcro |url=http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/knik-arm-crossing-bridge-too-far |title=Knik Arm Crossing: A bridge too far? |publisher=Alaska Dispatch |date=2011-02-16 |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref>
Supporters of the bridge believe that the bridge would allow the growing population of the region to expand into the Point MacKenzie area.<ref name="http://www.knikarmbridge.com/documents/KABATASurveyReport-Final.pdf">{{cite web|url=http://www.knikarmbridge.com/documents/KABATASurveyReport-Final.pdf|title=Dittman Survey|date=December 2011|page=18|publisher=Knikarmbridge.com|accessdate=2012-11-02|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140318023348/http://www.knikarmbridge.com/documents/KABATASurveyReport-Final.pdf|archivedate=2014-03-18|df=}}</ref> The approach road and connectors, along with the bridge total about 10 miles from Downtown Anchorage, about the same commuting distance as other available land in Anchorage. The residents of the Matanuska/Susitna Valley currently have only a single road to get to and from Anchorage and points south and Anchorage residents only have a single route to all points north. The [[George Parks Highway|Parks Highway]] which runs through [[Willow, Alaska]], [[Houston, Alaska]] and Wasilla, joins the [[Glenn Highway]], which continues along a strip of land between [[Chugach State Park]] and the military bases north of Anchorage. The Knik Arm Bridge and connecting roads would provide a secondary north/south roadway to Wasilla. There is however concern that the only paved connecting road on the Matanuska/Susitna Borough side of the bridge, which is the Knik Goose Bay Road, is presently overcapacity and listed as one of the four most dangerous roads in the state.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dot.state.ak.us/stwdplng/hwysafety/safety_corridors.shtml |title=Safety Corridor, Alaska Highway Safety Office, Transportation & Public Facilities, State of Alaska |publisher=Dot.state.ak.us |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref> The commuting distance for the vast majority of all existing residents of the Matanuska/Susitna Valley would not be lessened by taking the Knik Arm Bridge, a factor that Bridge critics say make KABATA's current revenue forecasts from the Bridge Tolls overstated.<ref>{{cite web|author=Andrew Halcro |url=http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/knik-arm-crossing-bridge-too-far |title=Knik Arm Crossing: A bridge too far? |publisher=Alaska Dispatch |date=2011-02-16 |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref>


===Defending Knik Arm Bridge spending===
===Defending Knik Arm Bridge spending===
Line 117: Line 117:


==Lawsuit==
==Lawsuit==
In 2009 Anchorage Metro Area Transportation Solutions (AMATS) decided to postpone the project and remove it from Anchorage's short term transportation plan until 2018. The cities of [[Houston, Alaska|Houston]] and [[Wasilla]] responded with a lawsuit because AMATS did not have the authority to delay the project, which is a National Highway System route.<ref name="http://articles.ktuu.com/2010-03-25/bridge-opponents_24128058">{{cite web|author=|url=http://articles.ktuu.com/2010-03-25/bridge-opponents_24128058 |title=AMATS votes to keep Knik Arm bridge in city's short-term plans - KTUU.com |publisher=Articles.ktuu.com |date=2010-03-25 |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref> In March 2010, the AMATS Policy Committee with new members, reversed their previous decision and re-instated the bridge into the short term transportation plan.<ref>{{cite web|last=Daily |first=Anchorage |url=http://www.adn.com/2010/03/25/1199730/knik-arm-bridge-stays-in-short.html |title=Knik Arm bridge stays in short-term plan &#124; Knik Arm Bridge |publisher=ADN.com |date=2010-03-25 |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref>
In 2009 Anchorage Metro Area Transportation Solutions (AMATS) decided to postpone the project and remove it from Anchorage's short term transportation plan until 2018. The cities of [[Houston, Alaska|Houston]] and [[Wasilla]] responded with a lawsuit because AMATS did not have the authority to delay the project, which is a National Highway System route.<ref name="http://articles.ktuu.com/2010-03-25/bridge-opponents_24128058">{{cite web |author= |url=http://articles.ktuu.com/2010-03-25/bridge-opponents_24128058 |title=AMATS votes to keep Knik Arm bridge in city's short-term plans - KTUU.com |publisher=Articles.ktuu.com |date=2010-03-25 |accessdate=2012-11-02 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20151018160151/http://articles.ktuu.com/2010-03-25/bridge-opponents_24128058 |archivedate=2015-10-18 |df= }}</ref> In March 2010, the AMATS Policy Committee with new members, reversed their previous decision and re-instated the bridge into the short term transportation plan.<ref>{{cite web |last=Daily |first=Anchorage |url=http://www.adn.com/2010/03/25/1199730/knik-arm-bridge-stays-in-short.html |title=Knik Arm bridge stays in short-term plan &#124; Knik Arm Bridge |publisher=ADN.com |date=2010-03-25 |accessdate=2012-11-02 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120825124908/http://www.adn.com/2010/03/25/1199730/knik-arm-bridge-stays-in-short.html |archivedate=2012-08-25 |df= }}</ref>


==Received "Record of Decision" from Federal Highways Administration==
==Received "Record of Decision" from Federal Highways Administration==
In December 2010 the FHWA issued a "Record of Decision" accepting the Environmental Impact Statement, after over seven years and approximately $53 Million spent on studies, preliminary designs, public relations and cost estimating.<ref>{{cite web|author=KYLE HOPKINSkhopkins@adn.com |url=http://www.adn.com/2010/12/15/1606454/knik-bridge-route-okd-questions.html |title=Feds OK Knik Arm bridge route, but big obstacles remain &#124; Knik Arm Bridge |publisher=ADN.com |date=2010-12-15 |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref> KABATA has stated that they have asked their Toll and Revenue Consultant Wilbur Smith Associates <ref>[http://www.wilbursmith.com/index.htm ] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110222202556/http://www.wilbursmith.com/index.htm |date=February 22, 2011 }}</ref> to re-visit their revenue and toll forecasts to reflect conditions that have changed since 2005, including revised population estimates for the Matanuska Susitna Borough by the University of Alaska Anchorage's Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), that are as much as 50% lower than those forecasts used in the EIS to show that the Toll Bridge was "financially feasible".
In December 2010 the FHWA issued a "Record of Decision" accepting the Environmental Impact Statement, after over seven years and approximately $53 Million spent on studies, preliminary designs, public relations and cost estimating.<ref>{{cite web |author=KYLE HOPKINSkhopkins@adn.com |url=http://www.adn.com/2010/12/15/1606454/knik-bridge-route-okd-questions.html |title=Feds OK Knik Arm bridge route, but big obstacles remain &#124; Knik Arm Bridge |publisher=ADN.com |date=2010-12-15 |accessdate=2012-11-02 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120819130410/http://www.adn.com/2010/12/15/1606454/knik-bridge-route-okd-questions.html |archivedate=2012-08-19 |df= }}</ref> KABATA has stated that they have asked their Toll and Revenue Consultant Wilbur Smith Associates <ref>[http://www.wilbursmith.com/index.htm ] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110222202556/http://www.wilbursmith.com/index.htm |date=February 22, 2011 }}</ref> to re-visit their revenue and toll forecasts to reflect conditions that have changed since 2005, including revised population estimates for the Matanuska Susitna Borough by the University of Alaska Anchorage's Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), that are as much as 50% lower than those forecasts used in the EIS to show that the Toll Bridge was "financially feasible".


==Legislative Action==
==Legislative Action==
Alaska State Senator [[Linda Menard]] and House Representative Mark Neuman introduced a set of companion bills in 2011 to establish a project reserve fund and clarify that the project is an infrastructure project backed by the state. These changes were necessitated by the national 2008 financial crisis. It would allow the state to repay the private investors when toll revenue is building up in early years after opening.<ref name="http://housemajority.org/item.php?id=item20110922-276">{{cite web|url=http://housemajority.org/item.php?id=item20110922-276 |title=Press Release: 2011-09-22 - Six Major Private Groups Show Interest in Knik Arm Crossing - 27th AK Legislature House Majority |publisher=Housemajority.org |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref>
Alaska State Senator [[Linda Menard]] and House Representative Mark Neuman introduced a set of companion bills in 2011 to establish a project reserve fund and clarify that the project is an infrastructure project backed by the state. These changes were necessitated by the national 2008 financial crisis. It would allow the state to repay the private investors when toll revenue is building up in early years after opening.<ref name="http://housemajority.org/item.php?id=item20110922-276">{{cite web |url=http://housemajority.org/item.php?id=item20110922-276 |title=Press Release: 2011-09-22 - Six Major Private Groups Show Interest in Knik Arm Crossing - 27th AK Legislature House Majority |publisher=Housemajority.org |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120630024228/http://housemajority.org/item.php?id=item20110922-276 |archivedate=2012-06-30 |df= }}</ref>


Senate Bill 079 sets aside $150 Million into a "reserve fund",paid by the State General Funds to cover the estimated deficits for the first three years.<ref name="http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_bill.asp?session=27&bill=SB79">{{cite web|url=http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_bill.asp?session=27&bill=SB79 |title=Bill History/Action for 27th Legislature |publisher=Legis.state.ak.us |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref> Senate Bill 080 says KABATA bonds will now be "obligations of the state."<ref name="http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_bill.asp?session=27&bill=SB80">{{cite web|url=http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_bill.asp?session=27&bill=SB80 |title=Bill History/Action for 27th Legislature |publisher=Legis.state.ak.us |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref>
Senate Bill 079 sets aside $150 Million into a "reserve fund",paid by the State General Funds to cover the estimated deficits for the first three years.<ref name="http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_bill.asp?session=27&bill=SB79">{{cite web|url=http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_bill.asp?session=27&bill=SB79 |title=Bill History/Action for 27th Legislature |publisher=Legis.state.ak.us |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref> Senate Bill 080 says KABATA bonds will now be "obligations of the state."<ref name="http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_bill.asp?session=27&bill=SB80">{{cite web|url=http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_bill.asp?session=27&bill=SB80 |title=Bill History/Action for 27th Legislature |publisher=Legis.state.ak.us |date= |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref>


KABATA CFO Kevin Hemenway told the Legislature's transportation committees that if the reserve fund dropped far enough "it would be subject to appropriation for replenishment."<ref>{{cite web|author=SEAN COCKERHAMscockerham@adn.com |url=http://www.adn.com/2011/02/12/1699393/supporters-seek-150m-for-knik.html |title=Supporters seek $150 million for the Knik Arm bridge &#124; Knik Arm Bridge |publisher=ADN.com |date=2011-02-12 |accessdate=2012-11-02}}</ref>
KABATA CFO Kevin Hemenway told the Legislature's transportation committees that if the reserve fund dropped far enough "it would be subject to appropriation for replenishment."<ref>{{cite web |author=SEAN COCKERHAMscockerham@adn.com |url=http://www.adn.com/2011/02/12/1699393/supporters-seek-150m-for-knik.html |title=Supporters seek $150 million for the Knik Arm bridge &#124; Knik Arm Bridge |publisher=ADN.com |date=2011-02-12 |accessdate=2012-11-02 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120825124237/http://www.adn.com/2011/02/12/1699393/supporters-seek-150m-for-knik.html |archivedate=2012-08-25 |df= }}</ref>


The bills passed the House but stalled in the Senate.
The bills passed the House but stalled in the Senate.

Revision as of 15:48, 18 September 2017

Knik Arm Bridge
Coordinates61°17′N 149°54′W / 61.28°N 149.9°W / 61.28; -149.9
CrossesKnik Arm
LocaleAnchorage
Named forKnik Arm
Characteristics
Total length1.74 mile
History
Construction cost$800 million (estimated)
Location
Map

61°17′N 149°54′W / 61.28°N 149.9°W / 61.28; -149.9

The Knik Arm Bridge is a proposed 1.74-mile bridge across Cook Inlet's Knik Arm to link the two fastest growing parts of Alaska – Anchorage and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough.

The project consists of a 1.74-mile-long bridge with 18 miles of connector roads, including on and off ramps, and a $50 million cut and cover tunnel under Government Hill.[1] Current cost estimates are between $700 and $800 million.[1]

Proponents say the crossing would provide access to much-needed residential, commercial and industrial land; create jobs; reduce the cost of transportation to Interior Alaska and the North Slope; lessen carbon emissions and provide an alternative transportation route out of Anchorage.

Opponents say the crossing would create unnecessary urban sprawl in the Anchorage area, would be more expensive and less used than projected, would divert limited transportation funding away from more critical projects, would disrupt the Government Hill neighborhood, and negatively impact the endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales.

Concept

The idea of a bridge or causeway across Knik Arm was first envisioned in 1923 by Alaska Railroad engineers looking for a more efficient route to Alaska's interior.[2] In 1955 a group of Anchorage businessmen studied it again.[2] At that time, the cost estimate was $25 million ($194 million in 2008 dollars). The development of Seward's Success in the late-1960s called for the development of both an aerial tramway and monorail to span the Knik Arm.[3] The Knik Arm Bridge And Toll Authority or KABATA, created by the Alaska Legislature in 2003 to develop a method of construction, financing, design, operation and maintenance of the bridge.[4]

Since that time KABATA has completed the final EIS, obtained a "build" Record of Decision from FHWA and moved into preconstruction activities including submitting permit application and purchasing right-of-way needed for a cut and cover tunnel under Government Hill.

Proposed townsites

A Knik Arm Crossing would provide better access to the southern part of the Mat-Su Borough between Knik Arm to the south and Big Lake and the Knik-Fairview area to the north. Mat-Su consultants[who?] estimate that 45,000 people could live in the area once the crossing is complete. Planning is now under way to accommodate this potential growth. The Southwest Borough Demographic Study has identified several new town sites, including one adjacent to the Port MacKenzie Industrial District, the Goose Creek Correctional Center, the Port MacKenzie Rail Extension and the Alaska Railroad Terminal Reserve on land owned by the borough.

Controversy

View of area from space. The bridge would cross from the city to Point MacKenzie, Alaska the green area to the NW of the gray city of Anchorage

Many Government Hill residents oppose the plan since many of the options presented would bisect the neighborhood and raze parts of it.[5] Some opponents argue the bridge is a "pork-barrel project" because it was tied to the Gravina Island Bridge in its $450 million plus funding legislation.[6] There is also concern it could threaten a population of beluga whales despite receiving a biological opinion of 'no jeopardy' from the National Marine Fisheries Service.[7] Interconnecting with existing Anchorage freeways and other arteries presents an additional challenge.

Original funding for the Knik Arm Bridge was provided by an earmark written by Don Young. The same bill funded the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere."

The Knik Arm Bridge and Toll Authority (KABATA) came under scrutiny in September 2006 when reports surfaced that its lead staff had received 20% to 30% raises at an executive session in August, raising to a typical salary of $130,000 per year. KABATA produced a 14-minute video which cost $57,490 including airtime.[8]

Former Governor Sarah Palin has been criticized for supporting the project, with one attorney for an environmentalist group suggesting she only supports it because it serves the area that she comes from.[9] Palin's running mate in the 2008 presidential election John McCain opposes the bridge, calling the bill funding it and the Gravina Island Bridge a "monstrosity" that was "terrifying in its fiscal consequences".[9]

In 2011, the city of Anchorage filed a lawsuit to force the federal government to drop its green light for the controversial Knik Arm bridge project, arguing that it would hurt the Port of Anchorage.[10]

Some people, including activist and investor Jamie Kenworthy, believe that the toll revenue estimates provided to rationalize construction are unrealistic, as well.[11]

Because of all of the concerns, the demise of the project has been expected for years.[12]

Support

Supporters of the bridge believe that the bridge would allow the growing population of the region to expand into the Point MacKenzie area.[13] The approach road and connectors, along with the bridge total about 10 miles from Downtown Anchorage, about the same commuting distance as other available land in Anchorage. The residents of the Matanuska/Susitna Valley currently have only a single road to get to and from Anchorage and points south and Anchorage residents only have a single route to all points north. The Parks Highway which runs through Willow, Alaska, Houston, Alaska and Wasilla, joins the Glenn Highway, which continues along a strip of land between Chugach State Park and the military bases north of Anchorage. The Knik Arm Bridge and connecting roads would provide a secondary north/south roadway to Wasilla. There is however concern that the only paved connecting road on the Matanuska/Susitna Borough side of the bridge, which is the Knik Goose Bay Road, is presently overcapacity and listed as one of the four most dangerous roads in the state.[14] The commuting distance for the vast majority of all existing residents of the Matanuska/Susitna Valley would not be lessened by taking the Knik Arm Bridge, a factor that Bridge critics say make KABATA's current revenue forecasts from the Bridge Tolls overstated.[15]

Defending Knik Arm Bridge spending

In October 2005 Alaska Senator Ted Stevens opposed diverting Alaska's funding for the Gravina and Knik Arm Bridge funds to Louisiana to repair bridge damage in Hurricane Katrina. In his speech on the senate floor, Stevens threatened to quit Congress if the funds were removed from his state.[16] Republicans in Congress dropped the specific allocation for the two bridges, allowing Alaska to apply the money to current transportation projects. Governor Frank Murkowski planned to fully fund both bridges: "I am proposing we spend the maximum allowed."[citation needed]

Lawsuit

In 2009 Anchorage Metro Area Transportation Solutions (AMATS) decided to postpone the project and remove it from Anchorage's short term transportation plan until 2018. The cities of Houston and Wasilla responded with a lawsuit because AMATS did not have the authority to delay the project, which is a National Highway System route.[17] In March 2010, the AMATS Policy Committee with new members, reversed their previous decision and re-instated the bridge into the short term transportation plan.[18]

Received "Record of Decision" from Federal Highways Administration

In December 2010 the FHWA issued a "Record of Decision" accepting the Environmental Impact Statement, after over seven years and approximately $53 Million spent on studies, preliminary designs, public relations and cost estimating.[19] KABATA has stated that they have asked their Toll and Revenue Consultant Wilbur Smith Associates [20] to re-visit their revenue and toll forecasts to reflect conditions that have changed since 2005, including revised population estimates for the Matanuska Susitna Borough by the University of Alaska Anchorage's Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), that are as much as 50% lower than those forecasts used in the EIS to show that the Toll Bridge was "financially feasible".

Legislative Action

Alaska State Senator Linda Menard and House Representative Mark Neuman introduced a set of companion bills in 2011 to establish a project reserve fund and clarify that the project is an infrastructure project backed by the state. These changes were necessitated by the national 2008 financial crisis. It would allow the state to repay the private investors when toll revenue is building up in early years after opening.[21]

Senate Bill 079 sets aside $150 Million into a "reserve fund",paid by the State General Funds to cover the estimated deficits for the first three years.[22] Senate Bill 080 says KABATA bonds will now be "obligations of the state."[23]

KABATA CFO Kevin Hemenway told the Legislature's transportation committees that if the reserve fund dropped far enough "it would be subject to appropriation for replenishment."[24]

The bills passed the House but stalled in the Senate.

In 2013 a legislative audit found that KABATA had overestimated potential revenue from tolls, leading to a decision to place the organization under the direct control of the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation, essentially stripping KABATA of any independent authority. The move is also expected to significantly slow the project, with AHFC explicitly rejecting any sort of timetable for completion.[25]

The day after KABATA was merged into AHFC the funding bill was passed, obligating the state for $1.14 billion for the project.[26]

On December 15, 2014 Governor Bill Walker announced the revised capital budget. It cut $45 million for the Knik Arm Project from the capital budget, that was created by the previous administration under Gov. Sean Parnell.[27]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2014-03-17. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  2. ^ a b "KABATA History". Knikarmbridge.com. Archived from the original on 2012-05-21. Retrieved 2012-11-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Porco, Peter (November 3, 2002). "City of tomorrow a failed dream of yesterday - Thinking big: Domed suburb across Knik Arm was planned in detail". Anchorage Daily News. p. B3. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  4. ^ "KABATA About Us". Knikarmbridge.com. Archived from the original on 2012-05-21. Retrieved 2012-11-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ Microsoft Word - 8-12-05 GHCC KABATA Comments.doc Archived March 3, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ [1][dead link]
  7. ^ "Endangered Species Act: Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion, VII. Conclusion" (PDF). Fakr.noaa.gov. p. 71. Retrieved 2012-11-02.
  8. ^ Christiansen, Scott (2010-07-28). "Just slightly north to the future - Anchorage Press: Anchorage Press News". Anchorage Press. Archived from the original on 2012-07-30. Retrieved 2012-11-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  9. ^ a b "Palin supports $600 million 'other' bridge project". USA Today. September 16, 2008. Retrieved May 7, 2010.
  10. ^ "KNIK ARM: Muni says it will hurt port, wants federal OK dropped". Anchorage Daily News. 2011-07-07. Retrieved 2013-06-21.
  11. ^ "Knik Arm Bridge Estimates Just Don't Add Up". Anchorage Daily News. 2010-03-15. Archived from the original on 2014-03-18. Retrieved 2013-06-21. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  12. ^ "Final Days of Don Young's Way?". Taxpayers for Common Sense. 2008-06-09. Retrieved 2013-06-21.
  13. ^ "Dittman Survey" (PDF). Knikarmbridge.com. December 2011. p. 18. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-18. Retrieved 2012-11-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  14. ^ "Safety Corridor, Alaska Highway Safety Office, Transportation & Public Facilities, State of Alaska". Dot.state.ak.us. Retrieved 2012-11-02.
  15. ^ Andrew Halcro (2011-02-16). "Knik Arm Crossing: A bridge too far?". Alaska Dispatch. Retrieved 2012-11-02.
  16. ^ "Stevens says he'll quit if bridge funds diverted". Anchorage Daily News. Archived from the original on 2006-10-14. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  17. ^ "AMATS votes to keep Knik Arm bridge in city's short-term plans - KTUU.com". Articles.ktuu.com. 2010-03-25. Archived from the original on 2015-10-18. Retrieved 2012-11-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  18. ^ Daily, Anchorage (2010-03-25). "Knik Arm bridge stays in short-term plan | Knik Arm Bridge". ADN.com. Archived from the original on 2012-08-25. Retrieved 2012-11-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  19. ^ KYLE HOPKINSkhopkins@adn.com (2010-12-15). "Feds OK Knik Arm bridge route, but big obstacles remain | Knik Arm Bridge". ADN.com. Archived from the original on 2012-08-19. Retrieved 2012-11-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  20. ^ [2] Archived February 22, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  21. ^ "Press Release: 2011-09-22 - Six Major Private Groups Show Interest in Knik Arm Crossing - 27th AK Legislature House Majority". Housemajority.org. Archived from the original on 2012-06-30. Retrieved 2012-11-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ "Bill History/Action for 27th Legislature". Legis.state.ak.us. Retrieved 2012-11-02.
  23. ^ "Bill History/Action for 27th Legislature". Legis.state.ak.us. Retrieved 2012-11-02.
  24. ^ SEAN COCKERHAMscockerham@adn.com (2011-02-12). "Supporters seek $150 million for the Knik Arm bridge | Knik Arm Bridge". ADN.com. Archived from the original on 2012-08-25. Retrieved 2012-11-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  25. ^ Mauer, Richard House panel votes to turn Knik Arm bridge over to AHFC Archived April 12, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Anchorage Daily News, 4/11/2013
  26. ^ Mauer, Richard House passed Knik Bridge bill Archived April 15, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Anchorage Daily News, 4/12/2013
  27. ^ [3] Fairbanks Daily Newsminer, 12/15/2014
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Knik_Arm_Bridge&oldid=801247834"