Jump to content

Talk:Quadrophenia (film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:


What year is the film set? I've seen the year mentioned in the plot section changed back and forth several times with no explanation. Is the year mentioned directly during the film? -- [[Special:Contributions/109.78.248.181|109.78.248.181]] ([[User talk:109.78.248.181|talk]]) 17:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
What year is the film set? I've seen the year mentioned in the plot section changed back and forth several times with no explanation. Is the year mentioned directly during the film? -- [[Special:Contributions/109.78.248.181|109.78.248.181]] ([[User talk:109.78.248.181|talk]]) 17:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
:The year (summer) of discontent was 1964; the events reflect actual happenngs, particularly the seafront riot scenes which can be seen in contemporary news reports and photos. One of the [[WP:RS|allegedly-reliable]] sources quoted actually states 1965, another mentions 1964. The events were so serious that I don't think the authorities would have let it spread/resurface into another calendar year?<p>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/may/18/newsid_2511000/2511245.stm This BBC source] seems reasonable, or this [https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=brighton+riots+mods&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6ss-Zh6PWAhXlA8AKHf2UCaMQsAQIcA&biw=768&bih=504#imgrc=zL79EtiYXZi1rM: Google image search] with images including newspapers. I haven't much time to research presently, but I have enjoyed skimming through ''some'' of the DVD reviews. [[User:Semperito|Semperito]] ([[User talk:Semperito|talk]]) 21:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
:The year (summer) of discontent was 1964; the events reflect actual happenings, particularly the seafront riot scenes which can be seen in contemporary news reports and photos. One of the [[WP:RS|allegedly-reliable]] sources quoted actually states 1965, another mentions 1964. The events were so serious that I don't think the authorities would have let it spread/resurface into another calendar year?<p>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/may/18/newsid_2511000/2511245.stm This BBC source] seems reasonable, or this [https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=brighton+riots+mods&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6ss-Zh6PWAhXlA8AKHf2UCaMQsAQIcA&biw=768&bih=504#imgrc=zL79EtiYXZi1rM: Google image search] with images including newspapers. I haven't much time to research presently, but I have enjoyed skimming through ''some'' of the DVD reviews. [[User:Semperito|Semperito]] ([[User talk:Semperito|talk]]) 21:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

:: Thanks, that helps. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.79.168.17|109.79.168.17]] ([[User talk:109.79.168.17|talk]]) 19:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:18, 20 September 2017


Sting is actually credited as Gordon Sumner in the film

96.235.144.151 (talk) 04:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)genepoz[reply]

I think Jimmy dies

Dudes, i know it is a little ambiguous in the film, but I think Jimmy actually dies at the end. Maybe if we put it in the wiki, it will influence other peoples' interpretation of the film and then we can all agree on Jimmy's demise.

It is not that I don't like Jimmy as a character, but I just think that the movie is an art house film and art house movies always end with the main character dying or something similar.

What do you guys think? I am putting this up for a vote. The ballots end tomorrow at midnight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.138.33 (talk) 19:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're completely failing to understand how Wikipedia works. Unless it's verified, we don't list it. And Wikipedia is not here to influence anyone's opinions. So using it as a tool to create different interpretations is strictly-off-limits. You can try to skew information towards your own bias on some other site. But Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia that only lists sourced facts. And voting, unless it's an attempt to reach consensus on the inclusion or exclusion of actual encyclopedic info, is completely off-limits as well. Also, please sign your posts. Friginator (talk) 20:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What Friginator said. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 22:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
While it is good you put this up to a vote, Wikipedia is not a place for original research or opinions on film interpretation - AKeen (talk) 18:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Watch the film again.......when the scooter comes off the cliff, Jimmy can clearly be seen standing on top of the cliff as the bike plunges to the ground.....the real give away is the beginning of the film when Jimmy is seen walking away from the cliff after already ditching the bike over the edge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.63.123 (talk) 10:29, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Die Aerzte

The article does not mention a song (and video) by the same name from the famous German band Die Aerzte. The video contains similar looking motorcycles to the one on the movie poster.

Below par.

For such a beloved film, I dont think much of the plot section. Surely someone can do better. The part where they try to buy drugs is missed out entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.236.49 (talk) 01:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as I stated in the edit summary last year needs Saturday/ nightclub and sleeping rough adding - there are chunks missing, but this is not uncommon in Wikipedia articles. I'll add it on to my 'list of things to do'...that'll make number 204!!!--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quadrophenia (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What year?

What year is the film set? I've seen the year mentioned in the plot section changed back and forth several times with no explanation. Is the year mentioned directly during the film? -- 109.78.248.181 (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The year (summer) of discontent was 1964; the events reflect actual happenings, particularly the seafront riot scenes which can be seen in contemporary news reports and photos. One of the allegedly-reliable sources quoted actually states 1965, another mentions 1964. The events were so serious that I don't think the authorities would have let it spread/resurface into another calendar year?

This BBC source seems reasonable, or this Google image search with images including newspapers. I haven't much time to research presently, but I have enjoyed skimming through some of the DVD reviews. Semperito (talk) 21:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that helps. -- 109.79.168.17 (talk) 19:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]