Talk:Alta de Lisboa: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:04, 27 September 2017

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Urban studies and planning Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Portugal Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Urban renewal

Has this project been developed on a previously developed site? Development on a greenfield site is not consistent with the concept of urban renewal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diffly (talk • contribs) 07:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A large portion of the site used to be a mixture of shanty towns, scattered informal workshops, some clusters of older settlements, including the town center of a rural settlement, and some early examples of social housing projects. It is acceptable to consider it a redevelopment, as most of the area already had urban uses before the project was started (albeit with big variations in density and formality). You can check an aerial photo of the area before the project started: ^[1] Pedrojpinto (talk) 10:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Urbanism dispute

This development does not appear to implement any of the defining elements of New Urbanism. A quick glance at the photos on the project's website confirms this (here's an example). I suggest removing any reference to New Urbanism and removing the category New Urbanism communities. Diffly (talk) 12:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, agreed. Doing it. Genjix (talk) 18:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://musgueirasul.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/mnmseoutros2.jpg

[1] ttps://musgueirasul.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/mnmseoutros2.jpg

[1]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ==Urban renewal==
 Has this project been developed on a previously developed site? Development on a [[Greenfield land|greenfield]] site is not consistent with the concept of [[urban renewal]].  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Diffly|Diffly]] ([[User talk:Diffly|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Diffly|contribs]]) 07:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:A large portion of the site used to be a mixture of shanty towns, scattered informal workshops, some clusters of older settlements, including the town center of a rural settlement, and some early examples of social housing projects. It is acceptable to consider it a redevelopment, as most of the area already had urban uses before the project was started (albeit with big variations in density and formality). [[User:Pedrojpinto|Pedrojpinto]] ([[User talk:Pedrojpinto|talk]]) 10:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
+:A large portion of the site used to be a mixture of shanty towns, scattered informal workshops, some clusters of older settlements, including the town center of a rural settlement, and some early examples of social housing projects. It is acceptable to consider it a redevelopment, as most of the area already had urban uses before the project was started (albeit with big variations in density and formality). You can check an aerial photo of the area before the project started: <ref>https://musgueirasul.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/mnmseoutros2.jpg</ref> [[User:Pedrojpinto|Pedrojpinto]] ([[User talk:Pedrojpinto|talk]]) 10:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 ==New Urbanism dispute==