User talk:MariusM

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello MariusM! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! —Khoikhoi 18:34, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Transnistria 1989 population

Hi Marius! You made some good edits to the text in the Transnistria article. However, one of the other editors would like you to please cite a source for the edit which you made to the 1989 population figure. The text itself is good, and we like your work; it is only the number which is being questioned. See the article's Talk page for more info. - Mauco 00:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Moldovan schools in Transnistria

Thanks for your contributions to this article. There are some style problems which you ought to correct. First of all, spelling. Second, the fact that the contents is currently "below the fold" now. This can be solved by adding a lead-in paragraph summarizing the article, and then having the contents box right below that. Third, you have a lot of placenames redlined, which can be avoided by using their monikers as they appear in Wikipedia. In case some are still redlined after you've converted the names, just start adding stubs. If you don't know how, I'll be glad to do a couple so you can see how, or else teach you. You should also consider shortening your subtitle which is currently a whopping fifteen words. - Mauco 02:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Basically, today there is no cultural life in cyrillic Moldovan. - You removed the {{fact}} tag from that sentence...? While it probably IS correct, the claim most certainly needs a credible source to back it up. --Illythr 20:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Look at the history at the article. The fact tag was added at the sentence "there are no newspapers or new books published in it" (in Moldovan cyrillic). It was not my sentence. I changed that sentence, as it is not true, showing that indeed exist one newspaper, state owned by Transnistrian separatist authorities, published in few hundreds copies, and also that separatist authorities published few textbooks for schools (in fact I didn't see any, but I heard about a book of Moldavian literature for schools by a mediocre writer from Chişinău, who found the opportunity to earn some money collaborating with Tiraspol). So, fact tag was correctly put at an untrue sentence, as I corrected the sentence no more need for this tag. There are thousands of newspapers or magazines in latin script (in Romania, even some villages have their own publication) and only one newspaper in Cyrillic with few copies; there are thousands of books printed every year in Latin script and in many years zero books in cyrillic (the Moldovan literature textbook is the single exception I heard in 16 years of Transnistrian separatism), so I believe that the sentence "Basically, today there is no cultural life in cyrillic Moldovan" is correct. What we can call "cultural life in cyrillic Moldovan" is entirely a creation of Transnistrian authorities (state-owned newspaper; textbook(s?) published by the state), and is too little to deserve the name "cultural life". Moldovans from Transnistria who want cultural life in their language read or write at Chişinău latin script publications - in fact there are some good Moldovan writers and journalists from Transnistria in Chişinău.--MariusM 23:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

You didn't seem to understand my point. The sentence about "no cultural life" is a sufficiently serious claim to have a reputable source behind it. You don't have to explain the stuation to me - I talked to people from several Transnistrian towns and have come to believe that the Russian cultural life has all but displaced the Moldovan Cyrillic there. But you see, we both believe that it's the truth. That's not enough for Wikipedia. --Illythr 09:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

I will try to find a refference. It may take some time, as I am overloaded with more important projects. There are also a lot of other things to do in that Moldovan schools in Transnistria article, watch it as I will make significant additions, but after some time.--MariusM 12:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Certainly. Okay, I'll add the fact tag back then for now. If you have no objections to my changes in the history section, I'll introduce them into the article as well. --Illythr 22:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Transnistria

I`ve retired from Wikipedia. That was just a neccesary intervention. I can reccomend the Romanian Wikipedians' notice board. Greier 17:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Transnistria, 2

Salut şi mulţumesc pentru mesaj. Trebuie să zic că nu prea-mi place să mă bag în conflicte din astea intensive cum e cel care se petrece acum pe pagina la care m-aţi referit dvs., mai ales că nu ştiu atât despre referendumul care se va desfăşura mâine (deşi m-aţi mai pus dvs. la curent). Plus că eu susţin planul Belkovski; vreau independenţă pentru Transnistria fiindcă ea n-a făcut niciodată parte din România (decât între 1941-4); România ar trebui să extindă 'de la Nistru pân' la Tisa' şi numai atât. Ştiu că sunt români în Transnistria dar ei eventual pot emigra în România întregită. În fine, articolul în sine e protejat acum dar când e de-protejat am să văd ce pot face ca să promovez un punct de vedere mai neutru decât există acum. Biruitorul 21:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Da, uitasem că planul Belkovski e un cal troian şi de ideea de monedă de schimb, dar şi aceasta are nişte probleme–cea mai mare fiind că (din câte ştiu eu) Ucrainenii nu au exprimat niciodată vreun interes într-un asemenea plan şi nici nu prea văd de ce i-ar interesa. În ceea ce priveşte Transnistria, eu aş zice că Nistrul formează o frontieră ideală–nu numai din punct de vedere istoric, dar şi fizic. Ar arăta cam urâtă harta României cu bucăţele de peste Nistru–e mai bine să avem un teritoriu compact decât să începem să arătăm ca Uzbekistan sau ca Kârgâzstan. Eu tot zic că o retrocedere la graniţele din 1939 e posibilă (da, domnule, şi Cadrilaterul e român!), iar faptul că ar fi teritorii majoritar ne-româneşti nu e o problema majora: deja îi tratăm relativ bine pe unguri, poate mai bine decât merită; ar putea sa emigreze din România Mare (a doua) dacă nu le place; şi mai sunt români de adus înapoi în ţara mamă ca să contracareze valul străin care va veni–în Transnistria, în Kazahstan, în Spania, Canada, SUA, Australia, etc. Oricum, când dezgheaţa articolul, mai fac şi eu ce pot la el. Biruitorul 22:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Transnistria, 3

Hello and thank you for your message. I've seen that you've already taken Greier's advice about posting at the Romanian Wikipedians' notice board. Unfortunately, personally I don't think I could be of too much help, as I don't like disputes, and especially I hate disputes about sensitive subjects like Moldova or Transnistria etc. who tend to get into lenghty discussions, therefore I don't blindly get into them, sorry! --Vlad|-> 07:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm lysy. Bonaparte was my Romanian friend but he god blocked by Mikkalai. I'm from Poland. Noroc.

Hi, lysy. You made big changes to "Transnistria" article, in which you deleted even some information I was struggling to put in. Maybe it will be better to look at the talk page before making changes (and join the disscusion in the talk page).--MariusM 21:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

• try to add Romanian language/Romanians there.

You should understand very quickly who is your friend. For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJayjg&diff=76290960&oldid=76181939 Telex is not. He made an allert for Jayjg. Why? They will check you. If they can they will say your Bonaparte and you'll get blocked. Maucow is pro-russian, as well as Mikka and all the others. If you don't make yourself friends in the Romanians community you'll be isolated and blocked soon. Noroc.

How can they say that I am Bonaparte, if I am not? If IPs are stored somewhere, they can check that my IPs are not the same as Bonaparte's.--MariusM 21:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

You are not talking to Lysy, you are talking to banned user:Bonaparte. The Romanian community is at the romanian wikipedians' notice board, not at open proxy IPs. `'mikka (t) 23:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Heaven of Transnistria

I run out of ideas, u can change whatever u want. EvilAlex 22:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

trust yourself

Cromwells Legacy

I deleted his comment because he's a sockpuppet of a banned user - banned users's can't edit. —Khoikhoi 23:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it was Bonaparte, although he's hardly a "legend", more like a troll. Regardless of whether his comment was valid or not, per WP:BAN, "any edits made in defiance of a ban may be reverted to enforce the ban, regardless of the merits of the edits themselves". That's why I removed it. —Khoikhoi 01:37, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Cocieri

You can create good articles. Please do so. Simple factual detailed articles will be more useful than political essays. `'mikka (t) 23:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

De facto independence

I am sorry I replied somewhat late to your invitation to take part in a discussion you were having with William Mauco. I did add something, but I'm afraid that it is somewhat buried in the deluge of discussion on Transnistria's talk page. I also wanted to thank you for directing me to the account of events in Dubăsari on AlterMedia. I am currently trying to learn Romanian better and I would be very interested in the sources you mention. Thanks! Jamason 01:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Links on Transnistria

Before re-adding any links (my links, EvilAlex's links, or any other links for that matter), please let us give others a chance to decide on that ... not me, or you, or EvilAlex. In the meantime, to follow the example of FrancisTyer who succesfully solved the last edit war with EvilAlex six months ago, I am doing the same as he did back then: Removing all links (both those which EvilAlex added, and my own, too) until this issue can be settled with a broader discussion ... well, actually, I just took at look at the page, and I see that 90%+ of my links have already been removed by EvilAlex without warning and without any prior discussion. Anyway, the last few ones can temporarily go, too, until there is consensus. Now, to repeat, we are not removing links but trying to get an edit war past us. While the links are still in the main page, they will be added, removed, re-added, and so on, until infinity. We know this, because we have been through it before with your collaborator, EvilAlex. This is his style, as a look back at the logs will show. The only way to deal with such a disruptive situation is to do what FrancisTyer did, short of locking the page down again which is in no one's interest and which we should only do as a very last resort. I am attempting to solve this situation and I am using the only proven method which we know has achieved consensus in the past. Please respect that and please do not engage in an EvilAlex-style edit war, Marius. - Mauco 23:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Multumesc MariusM :) pentru ceea ce mi-ai scris pe email :). Este atat de bine ca avem acest link din stanga email this user astfel incat am luat contact asa de usor. Am gasit material foarte important. Mai multe putem continua pe email. Multumesc :) --Loganos 16:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Sa-mi scrii numai pe romana. Nu vreau sa stie si altii ce vorbim. --Loganos 16:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Am votat asa cum ti-am spus si in email. De ce nu imi scrii?--Loganos 17:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Cine eşti?--MariusM 17:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Nu ti-ai pus adresa de email inca. --Loganos 17:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Incriminating evidence, eh? ;-) (Just in case: I'm not serious here.) --Illythr 20:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Apparently, it is (or rather was) Bonaparte... --Illythr 09:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Nu-mi amintesc să-ţi fi trimis vreun email şi nici n-am primit vreun email de la tine.--MariusM 17:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Of, ce greu merge. Pune-ti odata emailul in preferences si activeaza-l odata. Mai vorbim pe urma. Spune-mi numai cand iti e activ.--Loganos 17:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Tiraspol Times

Hi Marius

thanks for that, well spotted

Simple, over 150 international observers were asked at a conference for their report and they announced that the referendum system was fine. This organisation you mentioned is the only one I know about that had an issue, just wish they has said so to us at the time so could check it out

keep in touch

Mark MarkStreet

Hi Marius

The threats were veiled threats that I'd rather not get into .

To be honest I reckon they were just to frighten us but we have an obligation to take them seriously

Since then I think we have been excepted as been as balanced as we can. But its impossible to please everyone. 

The other matters will be discussed at editorial level to assess their merit at this time. But I see where you are coming from.

please keep me posted.

Tiraspol times has not voted for any site or link to be removed even though some clearly are full of malice towards us.. I Woild be grateful for more Pro Freedom of Expression support for all sites including TT on the wikipedia links.

Not sure if you voted to keep us or delete us, If the latter I would ask you for a reconsideration and change of vote if only on the basis we support freedom of speech to sites we disagree with and even abuse us for their own malicious reasons. and we have voted to retain these sites that abuse us in a dredful manner.

We believe evryone should have a voice and only ask the same right to speak in return

stay good

Mark

Henco

I actually think he's Bonaparte (he probably picked the username to mock William Mauco). If you'd like someone do to a check (with MarkStreet) go to WP:RFCU and follow the instructions there. Remember to mention which policy is being violated in order to get results. Cheers. —Khoikhoi 18:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

It seems that for vote fraud on ongoing vote I have to wait until vote is closed.--MariusM 21:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I recommend that you do it now, becuase if it turns out that there is sockpuppetry going on, the votes of the sockpuppets will be crossed out. —Khoikhoi 00:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I made a report at [1]

IMO, you would get better results if you posted it at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets. —Khoikhoi 00:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Done [2]

Stuff

Hi Marius. I was wondering if you think I should be the mediator—please let me know what you think! Also, Tzekai is not the sockpuppet of Tekleni, but rather, his previous username.

Regarding Henco (who should be blocked): I'm glad you filed a checkuser. Gallenweekend may or may not be him. They way checkuser works is they compare the IPs. —Khoikhoi 05:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

The problem is that you participated at the dispute at that article, you reverted the disputed paragraph (you didn't revert me, but an anonimous user, but it was the same paragraph). I believe you should join the mediation as involved part, not as mediator. I didn't see your name in the list of the members of Mediation Comitee. I saw also that you registered at "Romanian Wikipedians notice board", I wonder if you have some Romanian roots or you speak Romanian. This can be considered as you are not a neutral person in this case (a Russian mediator will not be considered neutral also).--MariusM 11:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I see what you mean. The anonymous user who I was reverting was in fact Bonaparte. As for my Romanian roots, my great-grandparents were Jews from Transylvania (my great-grandfather spoke fluent Romanian). I will participate in the discussion if I have the time. Ciao. —Khoikhoi 17:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)__

_____________________________________________

MARIUS

Marius, . I enjoy your observations and you clearly have somethig to offer.

Keep in touch.

I rarely am on this site. Just a passing interest.

Stay sharp, If you feel more comfortable please feel feel to write in Romanian .

Mark MarkStreet