User talk:95.145.130.94

Australian federal election, 2007

Bolding of federal election is correct. See Australian federal election, 2004 and Australian federal election, 2010. Thanks and goodbye. Timeshift (talk) 17:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

It is not. See the WP:MOS. Stop undoing my corrections before it becomes vandalism. 95.145.130.94 (talk) 17:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Even if you are correct you cannot be utterly inconsistent and just change one instance of it and leave the dozens of other instances in all other AU election articles as-is. Timeshift (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

I am correct, and it's not my responsibility to fix everything. If articles are inconsistent, that is the fault of the people who didn't bother to read the MOS properly, like yourself. Your edit warring is now problematic. Time for a report. 95.145.130.94 (talk) 18:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

95.145.130.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

False claim of abuse. I've done nothing remotely warranting this claim. It looks like I've been blocked specifically for editing the words "best known". So perhaps someone could indicate exactly where in Wikipedia policy it is specified that editing these words is an offence warranting a block. 95.145.130.94 (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=False claim of abuse. I've done nothing remotely warranting this claim. It looks like I've been blocked specifically for editing the words "best known". So perhaps someone could indicate exactly where in Wikipedia policy it is specified that editing these words is an offence warranting a block. [[Special:Contributions/95.145.130.94|95.145.130.94]] ([[User talk:95.145.130.94#top|talk]]) 16:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=False claim of abuse. I've done nothing remotely warranting this claim. It looks like I've been blocked specifically for editing the words "best known". So perhaps someone could indicate exactly where in Wikipedia policy it is specified that editing these words is an offence warranting a block. [[Special:Contributions/95.145.130.94|95.145.130.94]] ([[User talk:95.145.130.94#top|talk]]) 16:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=False claim of abuse. I've done nothing remotely warranting this claim. It looks like I've been blocked specifically for editing the words "best known". So perhaps someone could indicate exactly where in Wikipedia policy it is specified that editing these words is an offence warranting a block. [[Special:Contributions/95.145.130.94|95.145.130.94]] ([[User talk:95.145.130.94#top|talk]]) 16:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}