Talk:Sita: Difference between revisions
m moved Talk:Sita Devi to Talk:Sita: Per move request, apparent consensus |
closing RM discussion, page moved |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{move|Sita}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Hindu Mythology}} |
{{WikiProject Hindu Mythology}} |
||
Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
:Agreed. And it was Sita originally, perhaps moved because of the confusion with a company. [[User:Imc|Imc]] 16:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC) |
:Agreed. And it was Sita originally, perhaps moved because of the confusion with a company. [[User:Imc|Imc]] 16:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop --> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''PAGE MOVED''' per discussion below. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 00:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Requested move == |
== Requested move == |
||
[[Sita Devi]] → [[Sita]] — This is the name she's more commonly known by. "Sita Devi" is what ISKCON calls her. [[User:Hnsampat|Hnsampat]] 21:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC) |
[[Sita Devi]] → [[Sita]] — This is the name she's more commonly known by. "Sita Devi" is what ISKCON calls her. [[User:Hnsampat|Hnsampat]] 21:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
Line 29: | Line 32: | ||
===Discussion=== |
===Discussion=== |
||
Add any additional comments: |
Add any additional comments: |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom --> |
Revision as of 00:42, 14 October 2006
![]() | Hinduism Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Hi,
I have put the reference to Nepal at the place where supposed identification of legendary places with present-day geography is dealt withv - Anon
Links
Is the Ramesh Menon link meant as a reference? I only enquire as I'm reading the book now. I'm not sure the following merits a link but its an entertaining look at the Ramayana from Sita's viewpoint: Sita Sings the Blues Khiradtalk 14:16, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
pic of ravana and sita
That's cool pic. Where's it from?--Dangerous-Boy 09:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
This should be moved to Sita
Because the "Devi" part is honorific. Wikipedia is a secular entity. See how it uses Muhammad and Jesus, not "Prophet Muhammad" or "Jesus Christ"--202.156.6.54 12:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. And it was Sita originally, perhaps moved because of the confusion with a company. Imc 16:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
Sita Devi → Sita — This is the name she's more commonly known by. "Sita Devi" is what ISKCON calls her. Hnsampat 21:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Survey
Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
- Support per reasons given in RfM and for reasons noted in section above. --Hnsampat 21:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support per HNsampat --Arvind 11:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.