User talk:David.moreno72

This editor is a Senior Editor III and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star.

Welcome to Wikipedia, FAQ, Wikiquette, Be nice, and Talk page guidelines.

• Please leave your message at the bottom of this page, for example, by clicking "new section" at the top. Then put new text under the old text.
• If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your reliable references in the article you edited.
• If you came here because I added a CSD to your page, take your dispute to the talk page of the article.
• If you came here because I reverted your vandalism and you vandalise this page also, you will be reported.
• Please remember that I am not perfect and I do make mistakes.

04:33:47, 3 November 2017 review of submission by 203.223.190.245

• 203.223.190.245 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Cs academy school (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

11:59:28, 16 November 2017 review of submission by Kenny wilson32

• Kenny wilson32 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Eroc HistoryMakerz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, you stated in your declination response that you needed verifiable references not mentions however I did leave 2. One is a write up from ThisIs50.com whixh is 50 Cents website. The other is from 96.3 radio an FM station based out of the artists home town Indy. There were not mentioms but full write ups on the artist. I know you said don't ask for advicd but at this point I am not sure what you would need. It is hard to reference the music as a producer without mentions. Would actual song titles and works be better?

13:30:57, 16 November 2017 review of submission by Mofgeorgia

• Mofgeorgia (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mamuka Bakhtadze (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I added citations

13:55:25, 30 November 2017 review of submission by HyunDeok.K

• HyunDeok.K (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:KKuTu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Could you please tell me why did you decline this draft? Please tell me the reason. And I want to upload my article as a official article. Please tell me what should I do.

20:43:16, 30 November 2017 review of submission by Westgatetowers

• Westgatetowers (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:West Gate Business Towers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I think that the highest building in Croatia deserves a Wikipedia page, no one bothered to open it so i am doing it. Hope you can help. Thanks!

06:14:59, 5 December 2017 review of submission by Vandana.iitgn

• Vandana.iitgn (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sudhir K Jain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David

Can you help me better the article on Sudhir Jain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vandana.iitgn (talk • contribs) 06:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Request on 09:51:20, 5 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Kaimaximilian

• Kaimaximilian (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:X-plosive (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey David, thanks for your message. I created the article about X-plosive because there already exists one in German ( https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=X-plosive&stable=0&shownotice=1). Is it possible to reference German sources for the verification of the article?

Thanks in advance Kaimaximilian (talk) 09:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Kaimaximilian. Yes, you are permitted to use German sources, as long as they are reliable. Given that the page is for the English Wikipedia it would also be very helpful to also provide English sources. Thank you David.moreno72 13:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Sudhir K Jain's wikipedia page

Hi

My previous draft was rejected by you but I have tried and corrected the newer version drastically. Pls share your feedback and do not reject it outright now. Thanks Vandana.iitgn (talk) 12:08, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Vandana.iitgn. I have a strict policy to refrain from reviewing an editors AfC's once that editor has left a message on this talk page. The advice though that I will give you is to tone it down. The language used is very promotional and full of puffery. I also notice that many of your edits have been removed for copyright violations. That is not good. Persistent copyright violators can have their account blocked. I ran the page through Earwig's Copyvio Detector and it still comes up as 45.9%, so you need to review your edits again. Thank you. David.moreno72 13:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Vandana.iitgn (talk) 11:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC) How can I bring this Earwig's Copyvio Detector percentage down? I tred adding several more references and citations, but instead ending up having increased percentage. pls help!

Hi Vandana.iitgn. I have removed the copyright violations and the unsourced material. Now all that is required from you is to provide at least 3 references that have significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Do not resubmit until that is done. Regards David.moreno72 12:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Vandana.iitgn (talk) 12:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC) Great! I really appreciate your help David. :)

inline citation

Hi.. Kindly tell how can i insert inline citations in my article "Asif Ghauri"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kashifg (talk • contribs) 08:54, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Kashifg. All you need to know is at WP:REFB. Thank you David.moreno72 09:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Reasons for decline

Hey, please explain reasons for decline: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:FMEA_riskianal%C3%BC%C3%BCs Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elinakallas (talk • contribs) 11:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Elinakallas See on inglise keele vikipedia; võime vastu võtta ainult ingliskeelse keelega kirjutatud artikleid. Esitage oma esituse kvaliteetne ingliskeelne tõlge. David.moreno72 11:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Request on 14:10:06, 6 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Ebartey

• Ebartey (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ismaila Hansmittson Awudu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would be greatful if you assist me my article or autobiography on Ismaila Hansmittson Awudu. It was rejected

Ebartey (talk) 14:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ebartey. You need to provide at least 3 references that have significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. See WP:BASIC for further information. Thank you David.moreno72 00:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Issues in African American Music

Draft:Issues in African American music : power, gender, race, representation (book) I made an error. I inadvertantly submitted our article for review. It was unintentional. My WikiEDU course is constructing the article through the last day of our classes. The book/subject is notable as the text we are summarizing is written by leading scholars in the field recently published this year. I am also an ethnomusicologist. sheridanford (talk) 23:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi sheridanford. For the article to be accepted it has to satisfy one of the criteria in WP:NBOOK. The criteria then needs to be able to be verified with reliable sources. Thank you David.moreno72 00:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi David.moreno72. The book meets the qualifications. Thanks! Will insure this is clear. sheridanford (talk) 03:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello again David.moreno72: One of my students who is not complying with instructions is clicking the resubmit button for the article. They are done editing tomorrow. This was a failed attempt with a group of students who have not been complying on a number of levels. This article will not likely be published. I'll likely put it in a Wiki elsewhere and finish it with another group. New university and the writing fitness is much weaker than I anticipated. Better luck next time. Thanks for your assistance! sheridanford (talk) 22:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

05:48:18, 7 December 2017 review of submission by Br Miller

• Br Miller (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Battle For Dream Island (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The sources used on the Battle For Dream Island Wikipedia article were self-publish which would usually make the sources considered unreliable, however the self-publish source was used as a source on themselves. On the Wikipedia:Verifiability page it states you can use self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves so long as: the the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim; it does not involve claims about third parties; it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source; there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and the article is not based primarily on such sources. There are no self-serving or exceptional claims within the Battle for Dream Island episodes as the show takes place within a fictional universe. There are no claims about third parties in the show. There are no claims within the show that are not related to the show itself. There is no doubt about the show's authenticity. The episodes are not based on any sources as what happens within show takes place within a fictional universe. Br Miller (talk) 05:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Br Miller

Hi Br Miller. Yes, but to establish notability per WP:GNG, which is a requirement for the submission to be accepted, requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published (not YouTube), reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. That is a seperate issue to reliability. Self published sources cannot be used to establish notability. Thank you David.moreno72 05:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Request on 13:49:41, 7 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by John Abraham Awwab

• John Abraham Awwab (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:John Abraham Awwab (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

hello in which kind i have a problme in my User Talke page?

John Abraham Awwab (talk) 13:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

21:47:21, 7 December 2017 review of submission by Su001

• Su001 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Su001/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

can I have the reasons why you declined my AFC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Su001 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Thanks for the criticisms. I know it will make me a better person Su001 (talk) 21:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

User:John Abraham Awwab

Hi David.moreno72. You posted at User talk:John Abraham Awwab#Please stop that this editor has been blocked for previously trying to submit this autobio/slash draft, so I am wondering if you can specify what those accounts are. I was assuming good faith about the user page, but now it seems like something which should be tagged for speedy deletion per WP:U5 or WP:G4. Also, if this editor is evading, then perhaps an admin should be asked to step in. I would also like to know the other accounts because this editor uploaded the inofbox photo to Commons under a questionable license. Once again, I started a discussion about the file in an assumption of good faith, but if the same file has been previously deleted and the user just keeps re-uploading, then I will ask a Commons admin to take a closer look. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly. The blocked accounts are User:Muhammad_Ibrahim_Afkar and User:Ibrahim Afkar. The latest account, User:John Abraham Awwab, has not yet been blocked but should be reported for block evasion and any pages created deleted per WP:G5. Regards David.moreno72 03:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for that info. I started Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Muhammad Ibrahim Afkar and also posted a note at User talk:Alex Shih#User:Ibrahim Awwab. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Request on 04:57:47, 8 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by RexxiA

• RexxiA (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Cassandra Extavour (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, you recently declined my article on a scientist named Cassandra Extavour. I read the message you left and have questions. It seems like the issue was of "notability," but as stated in article her research discovered that evolution can occur in human in cells before gametes are even formed. This is was a key discovery to understanding evolution and how epigenetics occurs. So I think her work is definitely "notable." Another one of the reasons cited was sourcing. I cited a biography on her done by Harvard University, Crimson magazine, and a Sematic Scholar article-- which are all reliable secondary sources. I'm having trouble understanding why she is not "notable" and why the sources are not "fit" for wikipedia. Any explanation or help would be appreciated. Thank you. RexxiA

RexxiA (talk) 04:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi RexxiA. The claim of notability of 'evolution can occur in human in cells before gametes are even formed' is one that would need secondary and independent references to establish. From my reading it was in fruit flies, not humans. The cited biography in 'Sematic Scholar' is a start, but is not considered independent. You will need to provide at least 3 secondary and independent references that have significant coverage to establish notability. Thank you David.moreno72 05:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I will work on that. However, the Crimson Magazine is a secondary source that interviewed her about her research. I believe this source should be allowed to stay. RexxiA —Preceding undated comment added 05:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I hope you will approve now my article. You taught that my references are not reliable, but they are. The link to the article that you reviewed (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Saint_Joanikije_Devički). The firs reference redirects the reader to the Wikipedia article written in Serbian language that I have correctly translated in English. Which is probably the best source out here and should not make any troubles as it is already approved. The second reference is from the book not from some blogger on anything not reliable. Even if the site is quite old the source is totally correct if someone know Serbian language can approve it. Hope that now all will be correct and you will approve my article. Thanks forwardly ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semantron (talk • contribs) 11:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Semantron. I'm sorry, but Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference per WP:WINARS. Also, the other reference does not verify anything in the article, so its reliability is irrelevant. Your newly added reference is a start, but there needs to be at least 3, so you will need to find more. Thank you David.moreno72 12:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Review of corrected article by Semantron

Thank you for answering me quickly. I have corrected what you asked for with the help of some experienced Wikipedia creator. He told me that now my article is going to be accepted so I hope you can approve it now, thanks for your critics I am becoming better editor thanks to you. The article is (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Saint_Joanikije_Devi%C4%8Dki).Semantron (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

My athlete article

Why the article I’m submitting keep getting declined. Can you tell me explain what I’m doing wrong and need to correct Keitaviouswalter (talk) 11:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Keitaviouswalter. Apart from being an autobiography, which is frowned upon (this was in the first note but you chose to ignore it), you don't satisfy WP:NCOLLATH. If you wish to correct it you need to break the records in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Men%27s_Division_I_Outdoor_Track_and_Field_Championships#Championships_records . So your 200 metres time was 20.43, but the record is 19.87. For 100 metres your time was 9.98, but the record is 9.82. For the 4 × 100 metres relay the time was 38.91 but the record is 38.04. Thank you David.moreno72 13:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Request on 15:13:10, 10 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Eavichay

• Eavichay (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Slim.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Slim.js https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Slim.js

I'm not sure why was the article declined. Please elaborate.

Eavichay (talk) 15:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

My article again refused even if in those books that you told are not reliable are correct and I added two more references with reliable source which you didn't mentioned. Please approve it, it is reliable.

The article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Saint_Joanikije_Devi%C4%8Dki), you told that article do not have reliable sources connected in references. It's not true there is even further reading which you haven't mentioned anywhere which was added by experienced Wikipedia contributor. He said that reference is now totally reliable and ready to be published. Everything that is written in the books and on those two sites in Serbian even there are in English and French language is in the article all content. So there is nothing that is not already from that source. Please you haven't researched correctly references the article is ready to be published. Thanks forwardly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semantron (talk • contribs) 11:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Semantron. I'm sorry, but you have not followed the advice given to you. First I told you that Wikipedia could not be a reference but you then argued, saying '

You taught that my references are not reliable, but they are'. 

What I told you was then confirmed at the AfC helpdesk where they said

'The Serbian Wikipedia article must be removed from the references section because Wikipedia, being user-generated, is not a reliable' 

and at the Teahouse

'Wikis - including Wikipedia - are not regarded as reliable sources. So your reference to srwiki is not acceptable;'

It was a good start that you removed it, but you have ignored the other advice. For instance you were asked to

'In order to establish Notability, could you be a bit more clearer about Joanikije's current legacy. You said the relics are at the monastety and Christians believe they are miraculous. Which book, news story, article, etc exactly says this about the beliefs of current christians?'

You have not done so. You were told

'What we require for a Wikipedia article in English Wikipedia (it may be different in other Wikipedias) is references published in reputable places (such as books from major publishers) that give in-depth information about the subject.'

You have not done so. This is where you have gone wrong. An experienced editor has

'I've added a reliable scholarly source to a "Further reading" section, you may be able to use it as a reference. Other potential sources are [1], [2], [3], and [4]. If you rewrite the draft using these sources, it is likely to be accepted.'

But you have failed to rewrite the draft using the sources. They went further and said

'It would be helpful if you used inline citations to show which source(s) each statement in the draft comes from.'

You have failed to add any inline citations.

When you actually do as you have been instructed the article will be more likely to be accepted. The most important of these is to provide inline citations. As part of using inline citations is that what is being claimed in actually in the citation. That is absolutely critical and the article will not be accepted until that is done. Thank you David.moreno72 12:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Semantron (talk) 12:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Thank you for reviewing again this article, I am a bit stubborn but I really want to make this article active because it is correct and should be a part of Wikipedia. I have added inline citation about miraculous relics and other things that you asked. Everything that is written there in Serbian is on English to in the article, I managed to find it somehow after hard research. I resubmitted again and now I really hope that it will be published. Thanks again.

23:14:32, 11 December 2017 review of submission by 24.56.11.55

• 24.56.11.55 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Transformers robots in disguise 2015 toyline (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)