Jump to content

User talk:David.moreno72/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10←Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

Hello David.moreno72,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 805 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools
  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes
  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Framför Page

Hello! If you are kind please give me some advice on what is to be done to get my article validated. I work for Framför and I think it would be a good thing for our company to be visible on Wikipedia. I expect your reply. Best regards Cezar Cezar.vasiescu (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Cezar.vasiescu. Your relationship with the subject is a WP:COI and must be declared. Other than that, the subject does not satisfy WP:GNG and so a page cannot be created. Thank you David.moreno72 22:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

As part of Framför Company I have been assigned to do this, so my question is how can I declare that the relationship between me and this company is a legit one and I am authorized to write in their name? For the second part I will do my best to find some reliable sources, independent from the subject, that talk about their accomplishments and innovations. And please correct me if I didn't understood properly what is needed so that the article meets the requirements for the General notability. Thank you very much! Cezar.vasiescu 2A02:2F09:3E02:5F00:F42A:66EE:CA04:EB52 (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

User:ChamoliAnkit/sandbox

Hello, David.moreno72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:ChamoliAnkit/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:25, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi David

My original submission for TravelManagers Australia was declined because it was deemed to read too much like an advertisement. For this reason, I deleted many of the awards that were originally listed, which meant that many of the published, reliable, secondary sources that were independent of the subject were also deleted. My submission also follows a very similar format to that of its parent company, House of Travel, so I don't understand why it is not considered suitable for publication, given that the House of Travel page is considered suitable. Finally, there was a suggestion of conflict of interest because I wrote this content on behalf of TravelManagers who I represent in a professional capacity - however, I declared this before I submitted the article.

If you are not the right person to help me, please direct me to the right place to find help. Thanks very much.

@Robyn.nspr: Hi. I have checked your claim that, and I quote "I deleted many of the awards that were originally listed, which meant that many of the published, reliable, secondary sources that were independent of the subject were also deleted.", but if you look carefully at said references, you will notice that they are actually sourced from the subject, which per WP:PRSOURCE, DOES NOT make them independent. So, per WP:ORGCRITE, the company is considered as NOT being notable. Thank you David.moreno72 09:47, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited First Fleet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Editing with wrong language

Hi David, You rejected my edit due the wrong language. I apologize for that. I have now translated the page in English. Can you review it again, please. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jani_Vaahtera It has a link to page written in Finnish and relevant information in English as well. Kpilke —Preceding undated comment added 06:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Regarding profile of Sanjaysingh4334

Dear Wiki Team, Kindly improve my wikipedia and change it accordingly as u want. I have tried my best but not getting succeeded. Plz help me to live my wiki profile. Sanjaysingh4334 (talk) 07:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Rejected article on politician Carlos Daniel Delgado Vazquez

Hello David.moreno72,

I notice you rejected the article on Carlos Daniel Delgado Vazquez because, according to your responde, he's not notable. However, he has been the candidate of two political parties in Quebec, he has received awards by both the Quebec School board and Vanier College; He also created his own political party, which is the first global political party and he's got many projects which I have sourced and can be found on Google. Perhaps, since we're based in Canada, it would be best to switch your engine to google.ca for better results. As I have stated before, his involvement has been sourced and I'm willing to work with you in order to publish the article, however you rejected the article 2 minutes after it was published, leading me to think you did not take the time to search him online. Please let me know what we can do to fix this and as you say on your intro, We can all make mistakes so I know We can figure this out.

Best wishes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramzaleewohoek (talk • contribs) 10:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Help with Article

Hi David,

Thank you for feed-backing on my article (Jaafar Sheikh Mustafa) a Vice President of Kurdistan Region, I wanted to add a short article of his life biography, his page under the president (Nechirvan Barzani) is empty, however; I am so confused right now, I really don't know how to put the article together for approval. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanito77 (talk • contribs) 08:56, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Agios Georgios

Hi David, following a request for help at the Teahouse, I have worked to improve this article so that it now meeets our geographic notability criteria. You may wish to re-review it, but be aware there are at least two other Agios Georgios settlements on Crete, so including Lasithi in the title would be logical. Equally, you may prefer it to be picked up by another AFC reviewer and to resolve its titling. Either way, I'd now certainly be happy to NPP it. Seasons greetings, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Rejected article

Hello David, Please educate me to improve the rejected article of STPL. STPL is a very big company and information about this company is useful for many international personnel. This company works in the field of diamond cutting laser machines industry and very few information is available across the internet. It is a humble request to make information available for everyone. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stpl mark (talk • contribs) 06:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Rejected article

Hello, you recently rejected my draft Tom Thum, would you mind helping me improve it? I can also remove the unsourced information on the article CheatCodes4ever (talk) 06:42, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi CheatCodes4ever. Sure. Just collate as many reliable references that have extensive and independent coverage. Then, write, in your own words, the facts contained in those references. If it's not in the reference, do not write it. Have a great day. David.moreno72 07:29, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Rejected article about Samer Elnahhal

Hello, David.moreno72!

I am writing about one article draft you rejected kindly asking you to re-consider your opinion. Samer Elnahhal is a Finnish bass player who has played in Lordi, a heavy metal Finnish band who were the first (and only by 2019) to win Eurovision from Finland, for almost 14 years. Now he started his own career and many fans would love to know more about him as real Samer, not a character OX (rock musician). Futhermore, he needs his own Wikipedia page for his future career. If you have any futher questions, I am happy to answer and / or provide more evidence.

Best regards, Daria K. (Hullu Muija) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hullu Muija (talk • contribs) 21:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Celebritease

I have improved an article I submitted for review for “Draft:Celebritease(Bart Baker album)”, which you rejected back in October. Do you mind reviewing it? CheatCodes4ever (talk) 09:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Page Edited and Resubmitted

Hi The page [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Roney_Singh ] is edited accordingly and resubmitted for further verification. Please check the article for approbation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepjoy66 (talk • contribs) 11:03, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Rejected article inquiry

Hello! I wanted to discuss the submission I put in for a Thanos (Marvel Cinematic Universe) wiki page. It was declined, the justification being that "he subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia." You were referring to the Thanos comic book character's wikipedia page, however the page I had worked on is for the Marvel Cinematic Universe's rendition of the character. Many MCU iterations of characters already have their own unique wikipedia pages, like Tony Stark (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Stark_(Marvel_Cinematic_Universe)) and Thor (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thor_(Marvel_Cinematic_Universe)). It's also worth noting that a few of the MCU characters that already have dedicated pages are substantially less important to the franchise than Thanos, such as Erik Selvig (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Selvig) and Trevor Slattery (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trevor_Slattery).

Furthermore, the Thanos (Marvel Cinematic Universe) page has significantly more detail than what's provided on the comic book character's "in film" section. There we get a simple overview of the character's plot line. A dedicated TCU page allows Wikipedia to expand on his behind the scenes development, character arc, reception, cultural impact, and more. It's one thing to say the Thanos (Marvel Cinematic Universe) article needs more work - I might even agree with that argument - but to say it's not necessary because it already exists is erroneous. Every MCU character has a comic book equivalent, but the MCU's rendition of the character unique and should get the attention and detail it deserves. While there might be some overlap between this page and Thanos' comic book "in film" subsection, there is significantly more detail here and if anything we should remove some info there and redirect readers to this newly created main page. If this Thanos' page shouldn't be on Wikipedia, than neither should the Tony Stark page, the Erik Selvig page, and the countless other MCU character pages that are either in draft form or already published.Delfino319 (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Rejected Article

Good Morning Mr. Moreno I wanted appeal your decision to deny my article. I understand your reasoning, however what you may not know is that Mr. Jessani is a prominent figure in the robotics and STEM worlds in Virginia he has spoken at many debates, discussions, and at government meeting to speak on the importance of STEM and Robotics in schools. Although he may not be a global figure he is known in Virginia and is beloved by the STEM community and I think this page would be very helpful and inspiring to others who are not from this country and those that would like to engage in STEM activities. I know he was a inspiring guide to many like me and I think this page helps to add to the database. In the end if you still feel that he isn't big enough to be apart of the database then that is your decision and I will respect it but I implore you to change your mind. I am very sorry about my username I made this account when I was much younger and I could not find a way to change it I know it is very offensive. K1llY0uRSi1f (talk) 13:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi K1llY0uRSi1f. The subject clearly does not satisfy WP:GNG. Thank you David.moreno72 11:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello David.moreno72,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Resubmission of Metaeconomics Page

Editor Moreno, a few points here, to frame what was done in this 2nd Round revision of the proposed Metaconomics page: 1. Have converted the essay into encyclopedia entries.

2. Have added a substantial number of citations in order to document and clarify the empirical and scientific basis for Metaeconomics; even more could be added, as Metaeconomics is based in empirical science… especially in Behavioral Economics. 3. Have better linked it with other Wiki entrees, as in Microeconomics, Humanistic Economics, Feminist Economics, Buddhist Economics, and Ecological Economics, among others. 4. Have modeled it on the Microeconomics Wiki entry. Metaeconomics shares much of the same history (now elaborated in this version), and uses much of the same analytical machinery. 5. Have made it clear that Metaeconomics is uniquely different from Microeconomics in positing… with substantive empirical support… that rational choice is about finding balance in Self&Other(shared with others, but internalized within Own-self)-interest. 6. Have recognized the page could be organized with sub-pages, much like on the Microeconomics page. I see the Wiki conversation is not in agreement on the merits of sub-pages. Please advise.

Looking forward to bringing Metaeconomics into Wikipedia.

Thank you for your consideration and help in this matter. Sincerely, Gary D Lynne, Emeritus Professor University of Nebraska-Lincoln — Preceding unsigned comment added by MetaGary (talk • contribs) 22:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Update

Hi David, Please kindly recheck our new submission. Regafrds — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.25.140.186 (talk) 06:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Review My Submission

Hello, I have improved and created three articles, please review.

Dave Taranto

Hi Dave. I am a new Wikipedia user with alot to learn. However I intend, hopefully, to start an article. The article would be on a deceased Melbourne broadcaster and producer, David - Dave - Taranto, who was an influential figure in comedy broadcasting and production in the nineteen nineties before television, radio and live comedy in Australia became a more professional industry. The article would be, I believe, notable as it would contribute cited material to the crucial subject of Melbourne's biggest cultural features, its' comedy. Taranto's work as a producer would reference existing articles such as the Moosehead Award, the history of the Melbourne Comedy Festival itself (He co-ran the Festival at one point) and comedy history on 3RRR and PBS subscriber radio stations where he worked as a broadcaster. Of course, it references the two stations as well. I have a number of sources - comedians, writers and promoters: Paul Livingston, Token Productions, Janet A McLeod and RRR. I am a comedy writer myself and have worked with comedians, managers and producers for decades. I wish to contribute as best I can to the history of Australian comedy. Thanks for your patience and time. Crashingdown ManCrashingdown Man (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

my article.

so I seen you've rejected my article and said there was another like it. actually there is no article like mine. and I see you have rejected many other articles but mine is very different from others on the sanatorium. I want to know something. did you read my article correctly? I have sent if off again for some one else to review it. thank you for your time. have a nice dayAlivia watkins (talk) 18:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC) Alivia Watkins

Here is the article like yours, Waverly Hills Sanatorium you can edit this one rather than create another. Theroadislong (talk) 19:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Submission rejected: topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Mr. David Moreno Hope you find this message in your good health. My submission was been rejected with following comment "topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia." I have improved the article and also added information on Wikipedia. I request your goodself to please once review again and provide your valuable feedback. If you found it good and suitable to be approved I will be highly obliged to your kindness. Thanks and regards Akram Shah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akram Shah Hindustani (talk • contribs) 03:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi David.moreno72, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


help in my first article

Hey David, could you please add my first article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ali_Mansour_(actor) Diaa ahmedd (talk)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello David.moreno72,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources
  • A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
  • Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
  • A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
  • Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to RedWarn

Hello, David.moreno72! I'm Ed6767. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over a hundred other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 12:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)


review please

hello David, Thank you, . Draft Meets the standards, and I have modified the references And she has enough sources. Draft rejected before adding sources to it. tour guide and actor in Egypt , Trusted sources , and have Fame And sources more than Ali Mansur for example. I hope you look again, and We want to accept articles, and Thank you very much. --Mohamed Omar 3 (talk) 07:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi David Moreno, Would like to hire you write articles.

Hey David I would like to invite you for a business. You are expert in wikipedia why dont you capitalise something from your skills. Please get back to me I have an consultant business and many companies, persons and plotician in my contact list need this content writting on wikipedia. Get back to me if you are interested or suggest someone with similar interest. contact me on waris2gigani@gmail.com or call me on +91-9033170818 India.

Have a great time buddy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akram Shah Hindustani (talk • contribs) 13:04, 20 August 2020 (UTC)


Draft:Oki Muraza

I do not think he is notable,but one cannot tell without looking at the citations to his publications. The appropriate response might better have been to decline as not meeting PROF; Reject should, I think, only be used when there is no conceivable chance that anything could be found or added or referenced that would make an article possible. (Some reviewers also use it after several declines for the same reason) . I am re-reviewing it as decline PROF with an explanation. DGG ( talk ) 22:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Please Don't Reject Me — Preceding unsigned comment added by AryaUSASubway (talk • contribs) 06:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting my erroneous edit

Hello David, In your notes you say "Please remember that I am not perfect and I do make mistakes". My version would be "I am deeply imperfect and despite my best efforts I sometimes make bad mistakes."

I appreciate your reversion. My only excuse is that, if I recall correctly, I was called away urgently from my desk and hit "Publish" on the wrong page (I necessarily had two edits open at the time) -- then didn't notice a couple of hours later when I returned. Best wishes, Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 09:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Rahon

Sir, you were there on the subject page[[1]]. I am making some edits over there, kindly see and comment if they are in line so that I can continue[[2]]. Thanks and regardsRAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 09:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello David.moreno72,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Rejected Page

Hello! I can see you rejected the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:nyoferno: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Can you please advise how should the article look to be approved? And now, I can edit the draft, but I can't send it to reconsideration again :-( What should I do?

Thank you for your time and have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyoferno (talk • contribs) 07:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021: Qibli (disambiguation)

The following line appears in the article Sirocco:

Libyan Arabic: قبلي, romanized: ghiblī, which means 'coming from the Qibla', or scarcely qibli--Quisqualis (talk) 04:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Please advise

Hi David. I got a message on my "talk page" (73.95.132.151) that notified me that you had rejected my submission for a page titled CashMoneyElias (Twitch Streamer). There's one problem: I never made this submission, I don't use twitch and I have no idea who that is. can you advise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.95.132.151 (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft article "26 personas..."

Hi, David, I noticed that about five months ago you rejected the draft article Draft:26 personas para salvar al mundo concluding that the subject was not sufficiently notable to be included on Wikipedia. I just had a look a the Spanish Wikipedia, and they have quite a long article on the subject, along with a dozen sources. I assume you verified that none of these were enough to qualify the article for inclusion here on the English Wikipedia, but if not, I wanted to ask you to reconsider your evaluation of the draft. It lacked sources entirely, I know, but I also understand that failure to include adequate sourcing is not a reason for rejecting a draft, so long as such sources exist somewhere (which, it seems to me, in this case, they do). Thoughts? A loose necktie (talk) 13:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Overtaken by events. See Talk:26 personas para salvar al mundo for an explanation. Please do not take offence that I accepted this draft. WP:IAR for a good purpose. Fiddle Faddle 17:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I agree with your !vote. My resubmission and immediate acceptance is proving (0.99 probability) that unreferenced drafts should not be accepted. I will remain steadfastly neutral in the discussion Fiddle Faddle 10:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

My reverted edits

Except for the edit on Nahapana, where my goal was to make the Kharosthi more readable my making it bigger, all my other edits were all properly sourced and shouldn't have been reverted. 102.115.137.151 (talk) 10:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi 102.115.137.151. DO NOT MAKE TEXT BIGGER. David.moreno72 10:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Couldn't the text edits have been removed without deleting the rest of the information? Everything except for the text size edits was properly sourced. 102.115.137.151 (talk) 10:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

I don't know how I can help you, I don't know how to change image sizes on Wikipedia. 102.115.137.151 (talk) 10:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi 102.115.137.151. It's easy. Just remove the size. Look at my edits for reference. David.moreno72 11:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I removed the sizes, but I've been warned that these edits are disruptive and can get me banned from editing Wikipedia. 102.115.137.151 (talk) 11:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
You had been warned because you did not explain in the Edit Summary why you removed those image sizes. Thats all. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Revert Changes

Hi David.morano72,

I am Shivam Sutrakar, yesterday I made a change and you reverted it.

The link that I added was related to the article and also easily accessible to everyone.

Please let me know why you removed it.

@Shivam Sutrakar: Wikipedia is not for promoting your website. See WP:LINKSPAM. Any further edits like the ones you have done will be reported as vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you David.moreno72 07:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Kippeen

Hi David,

Can u help me please brother.

Kippeen section is quite important. Gilburri is not naked but the news article states "he has been living among the Aborigines for twelve years". In Wide Bay 1852 gilburri was the only Irish runaway living with the Wide Bay aboriginals for that amount of time.

Kippeen is an Irish word for the blackhorn stick which is very similar to an aboriginal weapon called waddy or nulla nulla.

What can I do to get this added please

Marcus Gilburrifahy (talk) 04:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Gilburrifahy. So, the conclusion that Kippeen is Gilburri is completely yours as it is not directly stated in the reference. Your conclusions, inferences etc are not permitted per WP:NOR. You will need to find a reference that unambiguously states that Kippeen is Gilburri, otherwise it cannot be used. Thank you David.moreno72 05:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

OK I have a second reference that states gilburri uses the codename Kippeen. That letter to the editor is a coded letter between Irish hibernians working with the Chinese and Aboriginals. Gilburrifahy (talk) 05:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Need Advice

Hi David, this is my Draft page Draft:M_Sivakumar, Now i am adding suitable references. Kindly check, if need more citation please advice me. regards YASER ARAFATH (talk) 02:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Finish the article Draft:Ezequiel Matthysse

Im finish the article Draft:Ezequiel Matthysse . Help me on create this article: Ezequiel Matthysse , please, thanks

Emat20211 (talk) 17:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Ezemat20211

Draft:Ezequiel Matthysse

Ready, again fix and solve the errors that you mentioned to me in Draft: Ezequiel Matthysse, I also added more references / citations and eliminated the "viral video" section, also eliminated phrases that could seem promotional content. Thanks for helping me and sorry for my mistakes, I keep learning! I hope you review the article and publish it Emat20211 (talk) 13:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Emat20211

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello David.moreno72:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Leytonstone Notable People

The reason for creating a subpage for notable people for Leytonstone was that it has become a long list that has limited struture or narritive. To improve reading of the main article, I suggest that (like TV episodes) this list becomes a subpage. Maybe I did not edit it correctly as you suggest it already exists... exactly, however this list is unusual compared with other places. Walthamstow for example does not have a long list of anyone of note that lives or has ever lived there. Please advise me of the reasoning for rejecting this subpage, beyond "it already exists". Thanks Jonnyspeed20 (talk) 09:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jonnyspeed20. Thank you for your question. What you are proposing is a WP:SPLIT, and does not require an AFC. May I suggest that you follow the procedure for a WP:SPLIT instead. Thank you David.moreno72 10:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, for now I've added a column format and moved it to the end; which substantially improves the article. I will revisit as WP:SPLIT if it continues to grow out of proportion of the rest of the article content Jonnyspeed20 (talk) 10:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

קיבלת צל"ש!

כוכב העורכים
i have a question about the topic which you had retrived. i accidently wrote it as an english one, Although i wanted to wirte it in another language. how can i change it without override all the links and etc? 
 TomerYakirStein (talk) 12:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello David.moreno72,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Draft Louis Riel (historiography) article

Draft Louis Riel (historiagraphy) article is intended as child article to Louiss Riel per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Louis_Riel#Stanley's_4_critical_perspectives_of_Riel_as_cited_in_Betts

The "or not" does not support ballooning the section in this article; as I indicated above, it would support creation of a more detailed child article. Cblambert (talk) 03:14, 8 January 2022 (UTC) J

Why is it that 'This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia'?Cblambert (talk) 17:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello David.moreno72,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 805 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 852 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72/Archive_14&oldid=1112009763"