User talk:VeenM64: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:50, 13 December 2017

Welcome!

Hello, VeenM64, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi VeenM64! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:44, Thursday, January 12, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, VeenM64. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop harassing Favonian

Please consider this your final warning. Acroterion (talk) 17:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing and harassment--Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.[reply]

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeenM64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't harassing Favonian, I was simply trying to draw his attention. I had posted a polite question for him earlier, but the fact that he was leaving it unanswered instead of simply just deleting it made me think that he hadn't noticed it. I had absolutely no idea at the time that he was actually ignoring me. Therefore, I consider the warning I received above invalid.

And as for the edit warring in his archive, I was not doing that out of sheer malevolence. I just was feeling frustrated upon finally realizing that he had no intent to answer my question. But it's okay, everyone makes mistakes, right? I've learned from this and promise never to do it again.

And yes I know, you're probably going to decline this now saying "But Favonian clearly asked you to stay away", but hear me out: I thought that request only applied to questions/comments regarding good faith. The second question I posted was simply asking him why he did what he did, and had nothing to do with good faith.

Decline reason:

"Stay away from my talk page" means exactly that; continuing to post on someone's talk page after such a request constitutes harassment. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeenM64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did you even read the final paragraph of my previous request? VeenM64 (talk) 19:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason given to unblock; I have read the previous request. I have also looked at all of your recent edits, and the harassment of Favonian is beyond question.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just didn't know that I was harassing him, okay? If you are still unconvinced, look at the comment I posted down below, and read what is in bold. VeenM64 (talk) 23:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes, I did. If somehow "stay away" means "don't stay away", then you block perhaps needs to be extended, as competence is required. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 20:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You probably didn't read it closely enough, and merely skimmed over it quickly. Let me clarify the crucial part for you: I thought that request [for me to stay away] only applied to questions/comments regarding good faith. The second question I posted was simply asking him why he did what he did, and had nothing to do with good faith. VeenM64 (talk) 20:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 :I just didn't know that I was harassing him, okay? If you are still unconvinced, look at the comment I posted down below, and read what is in '''bold'''. [[User:VeenM64|VeenM64]] ([[User talk:VeenM64#top|talk]]) 23:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)}}
 :Yes, I did. If somehow "stay away" means "don't stay away", then you block perhaps needs to be extended, as [[WP:CIR|competence is required.]] [[User:Jpgordon|--jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; ]]</small></sup> 20:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
-::You probably didn't read it closely enough, and merely skimmed over it quickly. Let me clarify the crucial part for you: '''I thought that request [for me to stay away] only applied to questions/comments regarding good faith. The second question I posted was simply asking him why he did what he did, and had nothing to do with good faith.''' [[User:VeenM64|VeenM64]] ([[User talk:VeenM64#top|talk]]) 20:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
+::You probably didn't read it closely enough, and merely skimmed over it quickly. Let me clarify the crucial part for you: '''<big>I thought that request [for me to stay away] only applied to questions/comments regarding good faith. The second question I posted was simply asking him why he did what he did, and had nothing to do with good faith.</big>''' [[User:VeenM64|VeenM64]] ([[User talk:VeenM64#top|talk]]) 20:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)