Jump to content

User talk:C.Fred: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 84: Line 84:


:<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Billhpike|Billhpike]]:</span> Yep, I did. I got the registered users' edits but not the IP's. That's been fixed. Thank you for pointing that out. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 20:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
:<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Billhpike|Billhpike]]:</span> Yep, I did. I got the registered users' edits but not the IP's. That's been fixed. Thank you for pointing that out. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 20:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

== Southside Christian School ==

Didn't mean to start a commotion working to edit Southside Christian School's Wikipedia page. I am a representative for the school and we would like to promote some of the more modern aspects of the school and the good we're doing in the modern age vs having information featuring a history that most are not proud of. While all of the information is true and cited it does not reflect the principles and truths of the school today and therefore portrays an incorrect picture of our establishment. Any suggestions? [[User:Dmillerrevlocal|Dmillerrevlocal]] ([[User talk:Dmillerrevlocal|talk]]) 13:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Dmiller 9:45 4/11/18

Revision as of 13:46, 11 April 2018

Fort Walton Beach High School

Hey! I don't know if you want to range block this IP and user but their back at Fort Walton Beach High School with their non-noteable additions and vandalism type edits. [1] I say vandalism since you explained very clearly to GenericAssUsername (talk · contribs) that it was not okay. Might not be them, might be a friend but I think this has gone on long enough. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey C. Fred. This IP 2600:8807:8340:356:d43b:27e5:5578:e8d6 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) just undid my edit of their obvious vandalism [2] on Fort Walton Beach High School. Would you recommend page protection? This seems to be slow vandalism every couple of days. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@HickoryOughtShirt: The kids don't have their toy to play with for a while: the page is protected. —C.Fred (talk) 03:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, thanks! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the Prakash Neupane article

Hi C.Fred,
This article has been been deleted via the WP:AF process three times:

On 23 March 2018 you accepted the Draft:Prakash Neupane move into articlespace. I think there is a problem with this.
Simply put: should an article that meets the WP:GNG be deleted because it was created and maintained by WP:SOCKPUPPETs? The sockmaster is User:Gaurav456.
I seek your further instructions how to proceed in this matter (Erm, not at work now). What do you think about this? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58: Regardless of who raised the concern that the new draft had addressed the concerns from the second AfD, I sent the matter to WikiProject Nepal for review. Two editors—one has "only" 830 edits, but the second is a global sysop—gave the green light to move it into article space.[3] Based on their familiarity with the subject area, I moved it.
So, even though the article was created by a sockpuppet, other editors have been involved in the article, so CSD G5 no longer applies. The only way forward would be a third AfD, and that needs to focus on the merits of the article, not the history of the creator. —C.Fred (talk) 13:39, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this reply. I apologise for the ill-advised G5 I added to the article Consider me thoroughly WP:ADMONISHED - page doesn't exist, but maybe it should - for my failure both as an editor and admin to pick up on what you pointed out. Thanks again. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bangladesh#Placename changes and Wikipedia policy . Worldbruce (talk) 02:54, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Blockhead (music producer) photo

Hi! I have edited this photo I put in several times but the bottom is cut off and grayed out. Any ideas? I know you said it looked right for you but I've checked it on several computers. Thanks! Bhamilton2 (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bhamilton2: I see what you're seeing now. It looks like the JPEG compression failed. What format is your original in? Can you recompress it and see if that helps? —C.Fred (talk) 20:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Nehlen page

Hello,

I am contacting you in regard to the Paul Nehlen Wikipedia page. I would like to ask you how it is that I am to add sources for the particular case in which I am involved. I edited some text, so that it would have a more fair, and neutral connotation. I also deleted libelous statements which were simply political hit-pieces and should be kept out of Wikipedia for the sake of reliability and unbiased information.

Elric Bellamy (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Elric Bellamy: Short answer: if you are involved in the Paul Nehlen article or any events mentioned in it, don't edit the article. Longer answer: You need to request your edits at Talk:Paul Nehlen and let an uninvolved editor evaluate the edits and make them if warranted. Make sure to cite reliable sources—especially since I notice that the material you removed back in February cited multiple reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 21:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


@C.Fred: Elric Bellamy (talk) 13:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not involved with Paul Nehlen or any events mentioned in it. I am an uninvolved editor who made changes using more neutral, and unbiased phrasing. You can keep asking me to provide reliable sources, when only editing the way things are phrased or removing small, libelous & statements which were false. Multiple sources which are cited are politically biased, and unreliable such as Huffington Post, Newsweek, The Daily Beast, and more. You may be interested in learning the meaning of reliable sources, when it comes to information. Wikipedia specifically mentions that they should have a neutral point of view. Perhaps you would like to read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources

I'm with the Camden Conference

Thanks for your reply and help. I'm a volunteer for the Camden Conference and want to set up an article for the organization.

Camden Conference (talk) 21:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply at your talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My Verification

yes,I have emailed to ask for my identity to verified. Sorry, it's taken me a while to work out how to message Simon Hobbs (talk) 01:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Southside Christian Revdel

When revdeling the copyvio, I think you missed special:diff/833100065 BillHPike (talk, contribs) 20:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Billhpike: Yep, I did. I got the registered users' edits but not the IP's. That's been fixed. Thank you for pointing that out. —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Southside Christian School

Didn't mean to start a commotion working to edit Southside Christian School's Wikipedia page. I am a representative for the school and we would like to promote some of the more modern aspects of the school and the good we're doing in the modern age vs having information featuring a history that most are not proud of. While all of the information is true and cited it does not reflect the principles and truths of the school today and therefore portrays an incorrect picture of our establishment. Any suggestions? Dmillerrevlocal (talk) 13:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Dmiller 9:45 4/11/18[reply]