Jump to content

Gay bomb: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 202.168.20.63 (talk) to last version by ClueBot NG
MORE realistic
Line 7: Line 7:


==Background==
==Background==
B U L L S H I T
Few well-controlled scientific studies have ever been published suggesting the possibility of pheromones in humans.<ref name="wy" />

Some body spray advertisers claim that their products contain human sexual [[pheromones]] which act as an [[aphrodisiac]]. In the 1970s, "copulins" were patented as products which release human pheromones, based on research on [[rhesus monkey]]s.<ref name="wy">Wyatt, Tristram D. (2003). ''Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste.'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN | 0-521-48526-6}}. p.&nbsp;298 Quoting Preti & Weski (1999) "No peer reviewed data supporting the presences of ... human ... pheromones that cause rapid behavioral changes, such as attraction and/or [[copulation]] have been documented."</ref> Subsequently, androstenone, axillary sweat, and "vomodors" have been claimed to act as human pheromones.<ref name = "Warren S. T. Hays">{{cite journal | last1 = Hays | first1 = Warren S. T. | last2 = Human | year = 2003 | title = Human pheromones: have they been demonstrated? | doi = 10.1007/s00265-003-0613-4 | journal = Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology | volume = 54 | pages = 89–97 }}</ref>

Despite these claims, no pheromonal substance has ever been demonstrated to directly influence human behavior in a [[peer review]]ed study.<ref name="wy"/><ref name="Warren S. T. Hays"/><ref name = "Neu">{{cite book | last =Bear | first =Mark F. | author2=Barry W. Connors | author3=Michael A. Paradiso | year = 2006 | title =Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain | publisher = Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=75NgwLzueikC&printsec=frontcover&dq=neuroscience+exploring+the+brain | isbn =0-7817-6003-8 }} p.&nbsp;264 ... there has not yet been any hard evidence for human pheromones that might [change] sexual attraction (for members of either sex) [naturally]</ref>

Using a brain imaging technique, Swedish researchers have shown that when homosexual and [[Heterosexuality|heterosexual]] males are presented with two odors that may be involved in sexual arousal their brains tend to respond differently, and that the homosexual men tend to respond in the same way as heterosexual women, though it could not be determined whether this was cause or effect.<ref name="Savic2005">{{cite journal | author1=Savic I | author2=Berglund H | author3=Lindström P | title = Brain response to putative pheromones in homosexual men | journal = [[Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.]] | volume = 102 | issue = 20 | pages = 7356-7361 | date=May 2005 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.0407998102 | url = http://www.pnas.org/content/102/20/7356.long}}</ref> The study was expanded to include homosexual women; the results were consistent with previous findings meaning that homosexual women were not as responsive to male identified odors, while their response to female cues was similar to that of heterosexual males.<ref name="pmid16705035">{{cite journal | last1=Berglund H | last2=Lindström P | last3=Savic I | title = Brain response to putative pheromones in lesbian women | journal = [[Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.]] | volume = 103 | issue = 21 | pages = 8269–74 | date=May 2006 | pmid = 16705035 | pmc = 1570103 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.0600331103 | url = http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16705035 }}</ref> According to the researchers, this research suggests a possible role for human pheromones in the biological basis of [[sexual orientation]].<ref>Wade, N. "[https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/09/science/09cnd-smell.html Gay Men are found to have Different Scent of Attraction]." NY Times, 9 May 2005</ref>

In 2008, it was found using [[functional magnetic resonance imaging]] that the right [[orbitofrontal cortex]], right fusiform cortex, and right [[hypothalamus]] respond to airborne natural human sexual sweat.<ref name="chemosensory">{{cite journal | doi =10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3148-08.2008 | first =Wen | last =Zhou | author2 =Denise Chen | date =20 March 2008 | title =Encoding human sexual chemosensory cues in the orbitofrontal and fusiform cortices | journal =J Neurosci | volume =28 | pmid =19118174 | issue =53 | pmc =2667117 | pages =14416–21 | url =http://pubget.com/site/article/19118174 | deadurl =yes | archiveurl =https://web.archive.org/web/20090604064743/http://pubget.com/site/article/19118174 | archivedate =4 June 2009 | df =dmy-all }}</ref>


==Leaked documents==
==Leaked documents==

Revision as of 12:49, 13 April 2018

The "halitosis bomb" and "gay bomb" are informal names for two theoretical non-lethal chemical weapons that a United States Air Force research laboratory speculated about producing; the theories involve discharging female sex pheromones over enemy forces in order to make them sexually attracted to each other.

In 1994 the Wright Laboratory in Ohio, a predecessor to today's United States Air Force Research Laboratory, produced a three-page proposal on a variety of possible nonlethal chemical weapons, which was later obtained by the Sunshine Project through a Freedom of Information Act request.[1][2][3][4][5]

Background

B U L L S H I T

Leaked documents

In both of the documents, the possibility was canvassed that a strong aphrodisiac could be dropped on enemy troops, ideally one which would also cause "homosexual behavior". The documents described the aphrodisiac weapon as "distasteful but completely non-lethal".[2]

Body odors

Body odor remote-engineering, such as halitosis and hyperhidrosis, was another possibility discussed. Again, these effects would be produced by a non-lethal chemical weapon — possibly one that would affect the hormonal and digestive systems. It appears that a 'heavy sweating bomb', 'flatulence bomb' and 'halitosis bomb' were also considered by a committee at the time. The plan was to make an enemy so smelly they could be quite literally sniffed out of hiding by their opponents.

Ig Nobel Prize awards

Wright Laboratory won the 2007 Ig Nobel Peace Prize for "instigating research & development on a chemical weapon — the so-called 'gay bomb' / 'poof bomb' — that will make enemy soldiers become sexually irresistible to each other."[6]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "Pentagon toyed with 'gay bomb'". France 24. Agence France-Presse. 15 June 2007. Archived from the original on 11 August 2014. Retrieved 15 October 2015. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ a b "Houston Voice Blog". 27 September 2007. Archived from the original on 15 October 2015. Retrieved 15 October 2015. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Bernard, Jerome (16 June 2007). "Pentagon once mulled 'gay bomb' to promote love, not war". Daily Times. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 20 August 2015. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Hambrick, Greg (12 June 2007). "Gay Bomb, For Real". Gay Charleston. Archived from the original on 16 June 2007. Retrieved 15 October 2015. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ Kay, Jonathan. "Jonathan Kay on the Pentagon's plan to build a "gay bomb": Why is this 2005 story news again?". National Post. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved 15 October 2015. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ "Winners of the Ig Nobel Prize". Improbable Research. 2007. Archived from the original on 25 February 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2007. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

References