Jump to content

User:AristonAstuanax: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tobias Conradi (talk | contribs)
individual writing systems templates are phased out, switching to Template:User iso15924
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{userboxtop||left}}
{{User beer}}<br><br><br>{{user Belgian beer}}<br><br><br>
{{User beer}}
{{user Belgian beer}}
{{userboxbottom}}
{{Beer-project-member}}
{{Beer-project-member}}
<br><br>
(Remember kids, it's not drinking, it's research!)
(Remember kids, it's not drinking, it's research!)
{{userboxtop||left}}
{{user cello}}
{{user cello}}
{{user orch}}
{{user orch}}
Line 10: Line 15:
{{userbox|black|white|[[Image:Mortarboard.jpg|40px]]| This user studies at the '''[[University of Tulsa]]'''.}}
{{userbox|black|white|[[Image:Mortarboard.jpg|40px]]| This user studies at the '''[[University of Tulsa]]'''.}}
{{user Dominican Order}}
{{user Dominican Order}}
{{Babel|en|el-2|ru-1|eo-1|SoE-5}}
{{User bored reasons}}
{{User bored reasons}}
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Userbox}}<br><br><br>
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Userbox}}
{{userboxbottom}}

{{Babel|en|el-2|ru-1|eo-1|SoE-5}}
{{userboxtop|writing systems}}
{{userboxtop|Writing Systems}}
{{user iso15924|Cyrl|5}}
{{user iso15924|Cyrl|5}}
{{user iso15924|Grek|5}}
{{user iso15924|Grek|5}}
{{userboxbottom}}
{{userboxbottom}}

{{shortcut|[[WP:WPOK]]}}
<br><br><br>

{{PhilosophyTasksBox}}
{{PhilosophyTasksBox}}
{{shortcut|[[WP:WPOK]]}}

Revision as of 16:31, 25 October 2006



(Remember kids, it's not drinking, it's research!)


  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.