User talk:PlyrStar93

Free Speech, NOT

Free speech exist for the things you don't agree with. Stick to your 000s and 1111s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.144.94.27 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 1 Feb 2018 (UTC) I agree with the user above. ^^^^^^ ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°) 84.13.220.154 (talk) 22:52, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports.Template:Z182 Beeblebrox (talk) 18:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

I do acknowledge, however, that this was an unusual case in that their global userpage which was displaying here was problematic. That being said, blocking them here wouldn’t have changed that. I brought this up over at Meta, where the userpage was generated and someone added a handy piece of code to their page that makes it not display on other projects, so basically they are Meta’s problem now. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

for that change you did to bittorrent that undid mine?

i just want to change common to famous — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zdrmonster120 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The No Spam Barnstar
	Thank You Thank You for reporting those vandals and spammers. I’ve seen you do it today and I present to you this. Keep up the good work and Happy Wiki. ARMcgrath (talk) 03:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

great admin!

You're great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.178.96.208 (talk) 05:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm not an admin. -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 05:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

any valid way to press a button (5 days)

HMRaya_5 is yet another 'playing' with the predictable items that Manda 1993 was blocked for... JarrahTree 12:26, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Global locks would hopefully be timely on this (although it still can get quite backlogged as well). Actually found another account from suwiki. -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 13:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. cheers JarrahTree 13:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

thanks, was just experimenting and did not know about the sandboxUselessbay2000 (talk) 01:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Scottie Hughes

I made an edit and it wasn’t vandalism. It was a legitimate edit. Find you something better to do and someone a little more receptive to your childish references to sandboxes! It was unwarranted and unappreciated, DO NOT let it happen again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DOADOC (talk • contribs) 10:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

DOADOC, you were expected to provide reliable sources for any additions of BLP, that's the policy. If you don't give a source when you make changes to a BLP page you will most likely get reverted again. -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 12:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: No Danger

Hello PlyrStar93. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of No Danger, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: released on notable label, reviewed by RS. Thank you. SoWhy 06:49, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Return of the flag vandal

Perhaps you know that the "flag" vandal has appeared several times over the past several months so the type edit you saw and reverted will be repeated until the user is blocked. I reverted four such edits and have now reported the user. As information. Donner60 (talk) 03:34, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

@Donner60: Yeah that's clearly him, this guy can be a nuisance. But what I found weird recently is their IPs now come from various locations (normally it should be China, but now I've seen Europe and America), they might have found a bunch of proxies to use. -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 03:52, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the further information. Donner60 (talk) 03:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

@Donner60: The flag vandal from China is this person Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Szm020730. SA 13 Bro (talk) 04:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

@SA 13 Bro:. Thanks. I left a special note on AIV that it was the return of the flag vandal. Some administrators are already familiar with this serially vandal. Administrator C.Fred blocked the user for 31 hours. I think the user likely will be back from the blocked IP address after such a short block but we will see sometime on July 29, I suspect. Donner60 (talk) 04:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Last Change

'Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Jeff Novitzky— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 02:28, 27 July 2018 (UTC)'

It was up there before for a long time. He okay'ed it. The proof is here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xxfT301Ii8. This is a long running tradition, please do not make changes.