User talk:84.250.17.211: Difference between revisions
→April 2018: Retitle section heading as "AN/I" |
→Not constructive?: new section |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[Special:Contributions/84.250.17.211|84.250.17.211]] ([[User talk:84.250.17.211#top|talk]]) 14:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[Special:Contributions/84.250.17.211|84.250.17.211]] ([[User talk:84.250.17.211#top|talk]]) 14:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
== Not constructive? == |
|||
Uncalled for to accuse me of being unconstructive. It was an genuine edit made in good faith. You are the one jumping the gun. The structure is still substantially standing and intact. It still exists. Only one section of it collapsed. If the rest of the structure is knocked down instead of being repaired then it could be referred to in the past tense. [[Special:Contributions/203.110.146.116|203.110.146.116]] ([[User talk:203.110.146.116|talk]]) 18:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:22, 14 August 2018
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.
Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.  Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
November 2017
Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of TCP and UDP port numbers— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 12:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Optakeover, mind explaining your rollback? I am the same person as in Talk:List of TCP and UDP port numbers#Statistics of cleanup efforts so far. You've also rollbacked lots of other (good faith) edits without rationale. 84.250.17.211 (talk) 12:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
"Word-replace "material" to "publications": Neutral point of view)"
Explain? ViperSnake151 Talk 16:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
@ViperSnake151: Your concern is about Special:Diff/812358133.
There are no physical, material objects in information shared via links. They link to copies of works or publications. Copyright Law of the United States (Title 17), Chapter 1 also talks mostly about works in context of everything and material in context of objects. The copyright law also doesn't concern itself with trademarks or patents, other "intellectual property" rights. The idea of copyright is limited: It's an exclusive right for a period of time, but you don't own the subject as long as you have it.
Is something wrong with my interpretation? 84.250.17.211 (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
February 2018
I do apologize for reverting your good faith edit on Special:Diff/825286254. Anonymous users editing frequently vandalized pages raises many red flags, and while not required, I would recommend acquiring a username to help prevent false positives. Again, I apologize for my mistake. - PabloMartinez (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
blanket blah
Hello, and thank you for greeting me with a standard blanket blah. It looks to me as if you have not paid enough attention to the WP:FAITH principle. Usage of copyrighted material without permission is illegal, both in WP and elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.126.8.121 (talk) 02:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- See Special:Diff/834529445 edit summary reasoning. 84.250.17.211 (talk) 11:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- I'd also like to note there is no "material ownership" but only limited period exclusive right in copyright. I like to talk about copyrighted "works" or "publications" instead of copyrighted "material". 84.250.17.211 (talk) 11:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
AN/I
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 84.250.17.211 (talk) 14:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Not constructive?
Uncalled for to accuse me of being unconstructive. It was an genuine edit made in good faith. You are the one jumping the gun. The structure is still substantially standing and intact. It still exists. Only one section of it collapsed. If the rest of the structure is knocked down instead of being repaired then it could be referred to in the past tense. 203.110.146.116 (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)