Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ancestral health: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
r |
2 cents, please |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{ping|JzG}} I'm puzzled by your assertion that a consensus not to blank "is not reason for not blanking". Isn't consensus the reason that we do anything here? Why does the discussion on a [[WP:JIMBOTALK|user talk page]] carry more weight than that on a [[WP:AN|centralised community noticeboard]]? – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 19:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC) |
{{ping|JzG}} I'm puzzled by your assertion that a consensus not to blank "is not reason for not blanking". Isn't consensus the reason that we do anything here? Why does the discussion on a [[WP:JIMBOTALK|user talk page]] carry more weight than that on a [[WP:AN|centralised community noticeboard]]? – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 19:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
: A small number of people agreed in an acrimonious debate on AN mainly centred on MH. You cite that as "unanimous". It is rather obvious by now that "unanimous" is superseded by a significant number of people who support blanking and are looking at the content, not the contributor. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 19:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC) |
: A small number of people agreed in an acrimonious debate on AN mainly centred on MH. You cite that as "unanimous". It is rather obvious by now that "unanimous" is superseded by a significant number of people who support blanking and are looking at the content, not the contributor. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 19:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
::Not sure I see the need for total blanking. If there is BLP violating or defamatory material, we can redact that and have the rest visible. I've protected this for a couple of days, wrong version, not the version I agree with either, blah blah. Hopefully we can sort this out before protection expires. Perhaps a fuller discussion at ANI or BLPN would help. For now, BLP concerns probably trumps other considerations.-- [[User:Dlohcierekim|<b style="color:black">Dloh<span style="color:red">cier</span><span style="color:gold">ekim</span></b>]] ([[User talk:Dlohcierekim|talk]]) 19:40, 28 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:40, 28 August 2018
Blanking
@JzG: I'm puzzled by your assertion that a consensus not to blank "is not reason for not blanking". Isn't consensus the reason that we do anything here? Why does the discussion on a user talk page carry more weight than that on a centralised community noticeboard? – Joe (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- A small number of people agreed in an acrimonious debate on AN mainly centred on MH. You cite that as "unanimous". It is rather obvious by now that "unanimous" is superseded by a significant number of people who support blanking and are looking at the content, not the contributor. Guy (Help!) 19:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- Not sure I see the need for total blanking. If there is BLP violating or defamatory material, we can redact that and have the rest visible. I've protected this for a couple of days, wrong version, not the version I agree with either, blah blah. Hopefully we can sort this out before protection expires. Perhaps a fuller discussion at ANI or BLPN would help. For now, BLP concerns probably trumps other considerations.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:40, 28 August 2018 (UTC)