Jump to content

Talk:Bhadralok: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


Is it really appropriate to include this article in the category page of social classes along with those such as [[bourgeoisie]] and [[lumpenproletariat]]? While there's no argument that a one must be of an occupation with social status and income above one of physical labour to qualify as a bhadralok, there's otherwise no defining means of livelihood or possession of wealth that defines the term. Furthermore, the term carries specific connotations of cultural, intellectual and, in some cases political, activities. Personally I think it's more accurate to conclude that this segment of Bengali society is a [[status group]] as defined by Max Weber. [[User:Brens|Brens]] ([[User talk:Brens|talk]]) 11:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Is it really appropriate to include this article in the category page of social classes along with those such as [[bourgeoisie]] and [[lumpenproletariat]]? While there's no argument that a one must be of an occupation with social status and income above one of physical labour to qualify as a bhadralok, there's otherwise no defining means of livelihood or possession of wealth that defines the term. Furthermore, the term carries specific connotations of cultural, intellectual and, in some cases political, activities. Personally I think it's more accurate to conclude that this segment of Bengali society is a [[status group]] as defined by Max Weber. [[User:Brens|Brens]] ([[User talk:Brens|talk]]) 11:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
==Nonsense==

This is an absolutely rubbish, self-proclaimed and nonsense, it is astonishing as how could such a page got its place in wikipedia. It has no basis. There is no Bhadroloke class or anything like this. This is just a cheating and diverting concept followed by only a handful few. Once there was Brahmo Samaj. But never there was any Bhadroloke class. [[Special:Contributions/117.194.196.155|117.194.196.155]] ([[User talk:117.194.196.155|talk]]) 08:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:15, 20 September 2018

WikiProject iconBangladesh Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:
WikiProject iconIndia: West Bengal Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as High-importance).

A social class?

Is it really appropriate to include this article in the category page of social classes along with those such as bourgeoisie and lumpenproletariat? While there's no argument that a one must be of an occupation with social status and income above one of physical labour to qualify as a bhadralok, there's otherwise no defining means of livelihood or possession of wealth that defines the term. Furthermore, the term carries specific connotations of cultural, intellectual and, in some cases political, activities. Personally I think it's more accurate to conclude that this segment of Bengali society is a status group as defined by Max Weber. Brens (talk) 11:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

This is an absolutely rubbish, self-proclaimed and nonsense, it is astonishing as how could such a page got its place in wikipedia. It has no basis. There is no Bhadroloke class or anything like this. This is just a cheating and diverting concept followed by only a handful few. Once there was Brahmo Samaj. But never there was any Bhadroloke class. 117.194.196.155 (talk) 08:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]