Talk:Bhadralok: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is it really appropriate to include this article in the category page of social classes along with those such as [[bourgeoisie]] and [[lumpenproletariat]]? While there's no argument that a one must be of an occupation with social status and income above one of physical labour to qualify as a bhadralok, there's otherwise no defining means of livelihood or possession of wealth that defines the term. Furthermore, the term carries specific connotations of cultural, intellectual and, in some cases political, activities. Personally I think it's more accurate to conclude that this segment of Bengali society is a [[status group]] as defined by Max Weber. [[User:Brens|Brens]] ([[User talk:Brens|talk]]) 11:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
Is it really appropriate to include this article in the category page of social classes along with those such as [[bourgeoisie]] and [[lumpenproletariat]]? While there's no argument that a one must be of an occupation with social status and income above one of physical labour to qualify as a bhadralok, there's otherwise no defining means of livelihood or possession of wealth that defines the term. Furthermore, the term carries specific connotations of cultural, intellectual and, in some cases political, activities. Personally I think it's more accurate to conclude that this segment of Bengali society is a [[status group]] as defined by Max Weber. [[User:Brens|Brens]] ([[User talk:Brens|talk]]) 11:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Nonsense== |
|||
This is an absolutely rubbish, self-proclaimed and nonsense, it is astonishing as how could such a page got its place in wikipedia. It has no basis. There is no Bhadroloke class or anything like this. This is just a cheating and diverting concept followed by only a handful few. Once there was Brahmo Samaj. But never there was any Bhadroloke class. [[Special:Contributions/117.194.196.155|117.194.196.155]] ([[User talk:117.194.196.155|talk]]) 08:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:15, 20 September 2018
Bangladesh Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||
|
India: West Bengal Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
A social class?
Is it really appropriate to include this article in the category page of social classes along with those such as bourgeoisie and lumpenproletariat? While there's no argument that a one must be of an occupation with social status and income above one of physical labour to qualify as a bhadralok, there's otherwise no defining means of livelihood or possession of wealth that defines the term. Furthermore, the term carries specific connotations of cultural, intellectual and, in some cases political, activities. Personally I think it's more accurate to conclude that this segment of Bengali society is a status group as defined by Max Weber. Brens (talk) 11:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Nonsense
This is an absolutely rubbish, self-proclaimed and nonsense, it is astonishing as how could such a page got its place in wikipedia. It has no basis. There is no Bhadroloke class or anything like this. This is just a cheating and diverting concept followed by only a handful few. Once there was Brahmo Samaj. But never there was any Bhadroloke class. 117.194.196.155 (talk) 08:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Start-Class Bangladesh articles
- Low-importance Bangladesh articles
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class West Bengal articles
- High-importance West Bengal articles
- Start-Class West Bengal articles of High-importance
- WikiProject West Bengal articles
- WikiProject India articles