Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:01, 12 October 2018

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of highest-grossing Indian films article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15: 30 days

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: Cinema List‑class Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business List‑class Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: Indian List‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Lists List‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Bollywood was copied or moved into List of highest-grossing Indian films with this edit on July 21, 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Great Father

Discussed this many times and still not able to understand why Great father cant be put in 50 crore club...Another report after 100 days run claiming its 50 crore collection..in this no where they have mentioned about the producer claim.what is stopping now?

Also how can u consider catchnews as a source for munthirivallikal and Ezra...what is the relevance of that website?Too much of intolerance for mammootty movies by admins who is handling this...guys what is your problem?

https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/mammoottys-great-father-hits-century-64874 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagar.kottappuram777 (talk • contribs) 07:55, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aadhi and great father collected 50 crore

Malayalam collection information is wrong Nabhan nbn (talk) 04:25, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 September 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Mollywood.lover (talk) 08:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC) Mollywood.lover (talk) 08:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please describe the edit you wish to be made. Fish+Karate 11:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 September 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The decimal point on the gross money made by bajrangi bhaijan is off by one digit. Rgaikwad88 (talk) 23:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done I assume you mean in the US dollars conversion? I've fixed that here. @Rajan51, Maestro2016, and Jupitus Smart: If any of you are familiar with this style of formatting, can you please double-check my edit to make sure I did it correctly? I don't really understand the formatting. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's correct. Looks like I had forgotten to add that extra zero for representing in millions for conversion. Rajan51 (talk) 14:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]