Jump to content

Talk:Kentucky meat shower: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
UFOs?: new section
Line 13: Line 13:


I would point out that the Times did not actually report the phenomenon directly, it attributed the claim it happened to two local newspapers. This fact is important because the most obvious explanation is that the newspapers just made it up. [[User:Geogene|Geogene]] ([[User talk:Geogene|talk]]) 17:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC) [[User:Geogene|Geogene]] ([[User talk:Geogene|talk]]) 18:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
I would point out that the Times did not actually report the phenomenon directly, it attributed the claim it happened to two local newspapers. This fact is important because the most obvious explanation is that the newspapers just made it up. [[User:Geogene|Geogene]] ([[User talk:Geogene|talk]]) 17:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC) [[User:Geogene|Geogene]] ([[User talk:Geogene|talk]]) 18:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

== UFOs? ==

Why is this categorized in the UFO-related content section? Reading the page there is no reference to extraterrestrial phenomenon, even as a hypothesis... [[Special:Contributions/129.173.213.205|129.173.213.205]] ([[User talk:129.173.213.205|talk]]) 20:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:54, 9 November 2018

WikiProject iconUnited States: Kentucky Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

Sources

Not sure how this is doing on notability other than online sites loving to share the WP page, so I found a few links for the future:

czar  03:13, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Reported" By the Times

I would point out that the Times did not actually report the phenomenon directly, it attributed the claim it happened to two local newspapers. This fact is important because the most obvious explanation is that the newspapers just made it up. Geogene (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC) Geogene (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UFOs?

Why is this categorized in the UFO-related content section? Reading the page there is no reference to extraterrestrial phenomenon, even as a hypothesis... 129.173.213.205 (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]