Jump to content

Talk:List of legally mononymous people: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tim! (talk | contribs)
m add wikiproject banners using AWB
Line 4: Line 4:
==Untitled==
==Untitled==
There's academic utility in a list of people who are legally mononymous even if they're not notable enough for articles. -- [[User:Resuna|Resuna]] ([[User talk:Resuna|talk]]) 19:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
There's academic utility in a list of people who are legally mononymous even if they're not notable enough for articles. -- [[User:Resuna|Resuna]] ([[User talk:Resuna|talk]]) 19:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

I can find no evidence that Elvis ever legally changed his name to a mononym, nor was he born mononymic, the only two criteria for making it onto this list. --[[User:Cryptognome|Cryptognome]] ([[User talk:Cryptognome|talk]]) 05:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 05:24, 10 November 2018

WikiProject iconLists List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAnthroponymy List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

There's academic utility in a list of people who are legally mononymous even if they're not notable enough for articles. -- Resuna (talk) 19:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can find no evidence that Elvis ever legally changed his name to a mononym, nor was he born mononymic, the only two criteria for making it onto this list. --Cryptognome (talk) 05:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

AFAICT references are better put in the pointed-to articles than in this - though I agree that having specific citations for the legal name would be helpful. 69.181.69.97 (talk) 23:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About Cher
According to this reference, Cher got legally changed her name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KillerQ (talkcontribs) 22:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Monarchy

Aren't British monarchy considered to have a single name? --aliw136 17:37, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

No, it's Mountbatten-Windsor. 71.176.51.160 (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to that page, "None of the above, except arguably the children of the Earl and Countess of Wessex, actually have a surname as part of their legal name", though - so the royal family are mononymous --24.228.88.37 (talk) 03:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chadrick W. Fowler -> "Chadrick"

There is no article for this person and notability has not been established. A legal document may show that the subject has changed his name to a legal mononym, but this is not necessarily sufficient to establish notability, otherwise this article would be a list of mostly Indonesian mononyms.

Reverted yet again. 71.176.51.160 (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/Chadrick_Final_Judgment.pdf

While not exactly a celebrity A-lister, Chadrick meets the requirements of being notable, being known to such a large amount of people through various works. The goal should be to keep this list as accurate as possible. As the notes to editors indicate, if anyone feels that this list is becoming too long, it should be separated into different categories (i.e. actors, writers, royalty, etc.), particularly for the sake of mononyms from Indonesia.

Remember, Wikipedia is not your personal blog. There are rules, and one of them is WP:WTAF . Take a moment to read it, and then also read the Wikipedia policy on WP:Notability. Keep in mind that just because YOU have changed YOUR name to Chadrick, is not notable enough in its own right. If you can find independent sources that conform to WP:CITE , add it to the article, then add Chadrick to the list. 71.176.51.160 (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]