Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishandot: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Spinningspark (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Bishandot: This is my first vote and for your information, someone else had put that first keep. You can check in Edit History.
Line 13: Line 13:
we can negotiate it.
we can negotiate it.


*<s>'''Keep'''</s> This Village is notable per [[WP:GEOLAND]]. This article requires only minor edits and should be kept. [[User:Papurat|Papurat]] ([[User talk:Papurat|talk]]) 17:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' This Village is notable per [[WP:GEOLAND]]. This article requires only minor edits and should be kept. [[User:Papurat|Papurat]] ([[User talk:Papurat|talk]]) 17:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)


** I've struck your second keep, you are only entitled to !vote once. You are also not entitled to close this discussion, please do not try to do that again. The article requires far more than minor edits. Large swathes have been repeatedly removed and reinserted (by you) which are entirely inappropriate for Wikipedia. [[User:Spinningspark|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 15:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
** I've struck your second keep, you are only entitled to !vote once. You are also not entitled to close this discussion, please do not try to do that again. The article requires far more than minor edits. Large swathes have been repeatedly removed and reinserted (by you) which are entirely inappropriate for Wikipedia. [[User:Spinningspark|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 15:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:11, 17 November 2018

Bishandot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable village unsupported by references. Article is peacock and original research beyond repair with any attempts at salvage or highlighting reverted by what appears to be sock puppets. PRehse (talk) 10:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:57, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I know that this article is not perfect but I told you that I am working to improve it. I will imply my improvements soon but it is not fair to delete anyone's article on personal problems. PRehse If you have any conflict with me, Talk with me!

we can negotiate it.

    • I've struck your second keep, you are only entitled to !vote once. You are also not entitled to close this discussion, please do not try to do that again. The article requires far more than minor edits. Large swathes have been repeatedly removed and reinserted (by you) which are entirely inappropriate for Wikipedia. SpinningSpark 15:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]