Jump to content

User talk:FlightTime: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:FlightTime/Archive 31) (bot
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 98: Line 98:


Hey so, over at the ANI there was a discussion about Keditz and his disruptive editing. One specific example was him changing Post Malone’s Rap Rock genre to Rock when the source stated the former. He has done the exact same thing on [[XXXTENTACION]] before it got locked further. If you check right now, the source for rock states “hip hop and alternative rock” (these were my sources which he reverted), and R&B’s source states “alternative R&B”. Plus he reverted other strongly sourced genres (such as Soundcloud rap w/ Vulture. I just was wondering could you revert it back to my genre structure, nitpicking if you feel the genre isnt as strong as i sought for it to be. Thanks in advance [[User:EveryonesFAVORITE*toy|EveryonesFAVORITE*toy]] ([[User talk:EveryonesFAVORITE*toy|talk]]) 19:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey so, over at the ANI there was a discussion about Keditz and his disruptive editing. One specific example was him changing Post Malone’s Rap Rock genre to Rock when the source stated the former. He has done the exact same thing on [[XXXTENTACION]] before it got locked further. If you check right now, the source for rock states “hip hop and alternative rock” (these were my sources which he reverted), and R&B’s source states “alternative R&B”. Plus he reverted other strongly sourced genres (such as Soundcloud rap w/ Vulture. I just was wondering could you revert it back to my genre structure, nitpicking if you feel the genre isnt as strong as i sought for it to be. Thanks in advance [[User:EveryonesFAVORITE*toy|EveryonesFAVORITE*toy]] ([[User talk:EveryonesFAVORITE*toy|talk]]) 19:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
==[[Minal Khan (actress)]]==
Sorry for any mistake, but nobody is trying to discuss at [[Talk:Minal Khan (actress)]] about the article. Is this title will be redirect forever? I mean if the actress meets notability then why every one is restoring redirect? [[Special:Contributions/119.160.117.61|119.160.117.61]] ([[User talk:119.160.117.61|talk]]) 20:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:23, 1 December 2018

Status:    (Around)


SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer as active on Wikipedia.

dif tor heh smusma

Welcome To My Talk Page
FlightTime ( talk · contribs · count · accounts · move log · global rename log · uploads · logs · rights)

FlightTime Phone (talk · contribs · count)

FlightTime Public (talk · contribs · count)
It is 1:06 PM where this user lives in the Mojave Desert. (Purge)
Topic Subscriptions
Show all my user sub-pages
Vn-28This user talk page has been Vandalised 28 times.
This user has been blocked from editing Wikipedia 3 times.
RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Asilvering 145 0 0 100 09:15, 6 September 2024 3 days, 13 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
It is 1:06 PM where this user lives in the Mojave Desert. (Purge)


A message from Asherer922

Hey. Thanks for the feedback on my addition to the Alice Cooper page. I guess I was a little confused because I didn't see where the post broke any of the guidelines for citing IMDB.

(COPIED from the Citing IMDB Page)

   Any potentially contentious material about living persons (BLPs).
   Cast lists, etc. for films and television programming that are still in development or production, and have yet to premiere.
   The user comments for each title (this includes user reviews and ratings), which are pure user-generated content.
   Sections written in wiki-style with minimal editorial control. Those would be the FAQs for particular titles (not the database FAQ), the parental guides, and the plot synopses (not to be confused with the plot outlines or plot summaries, which are subject to editorial control).
   Newsgroup reviews, which are archived Usenet postings.
   The trivia and goofs sections that are based on user submissions.
   The recommendations.

For future edits, can you clarify where I went wrong?

Thanks.

I'm still a little confused. What makes the edit potentially contentious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asherer922 (talkcontribs) 19:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Asherer922 (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Asherer922: Well, you answered your own question with the copied text, but it makes more sense with the section header just above what you copied.
   Questionable resources
   Any potentially contentious material about living persons (BLPs).

Alice Cooper is a Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (BLP) article.

- FlightTime (open channel) 19:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keditz||XXXTENTACION

Hey so, over at the ANI there was a discussion about Keditz and his disruptive editing. One specific example was him changing Post Malone’s Rap Rock genre to Rock when the source stated the former. He has done the exact same thing on XXXTENTACION before it got locked further. If you check right now, the source for rock states “hip hop and alternative rock” (these were my sources which he reverted), and R&B’s source states “alternative R&B”. Plus he reverted other strongly sourced genres (such as Soundcloud rap w/ Vulture. I just was wondering could you revert it back to my genre structure, nitpicking if you feel the genre isnt as strong as i sought for it to be. Thanks in advance EveryonesFAVORITE*toy (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for any mistake, but nobody is trying to discuss at Talk:Minal Khan (actress) about the article. Is this title will be redirect forever? I mean if the actress meets notability then why every one is restoring redirect? 119.160.117.61 (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]