Jump to content

User talk:FlightTime: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Minal Khan (actress): Grabbed from the other IP talk page
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 102: Line 102:


:Redirected pages have nothing to do with the nobility of the subject, it's more along the lines of helping to find the subject's page. - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:FlightTime|<span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FlightTime|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 20:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
:Redirected pages have nothing to do with the nobility of the subject, it's more along the lines of helping to find the subject's page. - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:FlightTime|<span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FlightTime|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 20:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
::You are right but at that time may be she was not notable of being a stand alone article but now article is well sources. She can easily passes [[WP:NACTOR]] and [[WP:GNG]] but contineously redirected multiple times. Did you saw that article? [[Special:Contributions/119.160.117.61|119.160.117.61]] ([[User talk:119.160.117.61|talk]]) 20:30, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:30, 1 December 2018

Status:    (Around)


SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer as active on Wikipedia.

dif tor heh smusma

Welcome To My Talk Page
FlightTime ( talk · contribs · count · accounts · move log · global rename log · uploads · logs · rights)

FlightTime Phone (talk · contribs · count)

FlightTime Public (talk · contribs · count)
It is 6:39 PM where this user lives in the Mojave Desert. (Purge)
Topic Subscriptions
Show all my user sub-pages
Vn-28This user talk page has been Vandalised 28 times.
This user has been blocked from editing Wikipedia 3 times.
RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 21:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

It is 6:39 PM where this user lives in the Mojave Desert. (Purge)


A message from Asherer922

Hey. Thanks for the feedback on my addition to the Alice Cooper page. I guess I was a little confused because I didn't see where the post broke any of the guidelines for citing IMDB.

(COPIED from the Citing IMDB Page)

   Any potentially contentious material about living persons (BLPs).
   Cast lists, etc. for films and television programming that are still in development or production, and have yet to premiere.
   The user comments for each title (this includes user reviews and ratings), which are pure user-generated content.
   Sections written in wiki-style with minimal editorial control. Those would be the FAQs for particular titles (not the database FAQ), the parental guides, and the plot synopses (not to be confused with the plot outlines or plot summaries, which are subject to editorial control).
   Newsgroup reviews, which are archived Usenet postings.
   The trivia and goofs sections that are based on user submissions.
   The recommendations.

For future edits, can you clarify where I went wrong?

Thanks.

I'm still a little confused. What makes the edit potentially contentious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asherer922 (talkcontribs) 19:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Asherer922 (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Asherer922: Well, you answered your own question with the copied text, but it makes more sense with the section header just above what you copied.
   Questionable resources
   Any potentially contentious material about living persons (BLPs).

Alice Cooper is a Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (BLP) article.

- FlightTime (open channel) 19:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keditz||XXXTENTACION

Hey so, over at the ANI there was a discussion about Keditz and his disruptive editing. One specific example was him changing Post Malone’s Rap Rock genre to Rock when the source stated the former. He has done the exact same thing on XXXTENTACION before it got locked further. If you check right now, the source for rock states “hip hop and alternative rock” (these were my sources which he reverted), and R&B’s source states “alternative R&B”. Plus he reverted other strongly sourced genres (such as Soundcloud rap w/ Vulture. I just was wondering could you revert it back to my genre structure, nitpicking if you feel the genre isnt as strong as i sought for it to be. Thanks in advance EveryonesFAVORITE*toy (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for any mistake, but nobody is trying to discuss at Talk:Minal Khan (actress) about the article. Is this title will be redirect forever? I mean if the actress meets notability then why every one is restoring redirect? 119.160.117.61 (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected pages have nothing to do with the nobility of the subject, it's more along the lines of helping to find the subject's page. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are right but at that time may be she was not notable of being a stand alone article but now article is well sources. She can easily passes WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG but contineously redirected multiple times. Did you saw that article? 119.160.117.61 (talk) 20:30, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]