User talk:FlightTime: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
:Redirected pages have nothing to do with the nobility of the subject, it's more along the lines of helping to find the subject's page. - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:FlightTime|<span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FlightTime|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 20:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
:Redirected pages have nothing to do with the nobility of the subject, it's more along the lines of helping to find the subject's page. - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:FlightTime|<span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FlightTime|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 20:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
::You are right but at that time may be she was not notable of being a stand alone article but now article is well sources. |
::You are right but at that time may be she was not notable of being a stand alone article but now article is well sources. Actress can easily passes [[WP:NACTOR]] and [[WP:GNG]] but contineously redirected multiple times. Did you saw that article? [[Special:Contributions/119.160.117.61|119.160.117.61]] ([[User talk:119.160.117.61|talk]]) 20:30, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:30, 1 December 2018
Status: (Around)
{{ping|FlightTime}}
with your message. Thank you
FlightTime Phone (talk · contribs · count)
FlightTime Public (talk · contribs · count)If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please Click Here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. To keep discussions coherent, I will usually answer in the talk page where the first message was placed. If I left you a message on another talk page, please answer there: I will have it on my watch list. Thank you. |
Vn-28 | This user talk page has been Vandalised 28 times. |
No RfXs since 21:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Archives Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
This is FlightTime's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
A message from Asherer922
Hey. Thanks for the feedback on my addition to the Alice Cooper page. I guess I was a little confused because I didn't see where the post broke any of the guidelines for citing IMDB.
(COPIED from the Citing IMDB Page)
Any potentially contentious material about living persons (BLPs). Cast lists, etc. for films and television programming that are still in development or production, and have yet to premiere. The user comments for each title (this includes user reviews and ratings), which are pure user-generated content. Sections written in wiki-style with minimal editorial control. Those would be the FAQs for particular titles (not the database FAQ), the parental guides, and the plot synopses (not to be confused with the plot outlines or plot summaries, which are subject to editorial control). Newsgroup reviews, which are archived Usenet postings. The trivia and goofs sections that are based on user submissions. The recommendations.
For future edits, can you clarify where I went wrong?
Thanks.
I'm still a little confused. What makes the edit potentially contentious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asherer922 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Asherer922 (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Asherer922: Well, you answered your own question with the copied text, but it makes more sense with the section header just above what you copied.
Questionable resources Any potentially contentious material about living persons (BLPs).
Alice Cooper is a Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (BLP) article.
- FlightTime (open channel) 19:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Keditz||XXXTENTACION
Hey so, over at the ANI there was a discussion about Keditz and his disruptive editing. One specific example was him changing Post Malone’s Rap Rock genre to Rock when the source stated the former. He has done the exact same thing on XXXTENTACION before it got locked further. If you check right now, the source for rock states “hip hop and alternative rock” (these were my sources which he reverted), and R&B’s source states “alternative R&B”. Plus he reverted other strongly sourced genres (such as Soundcloud rap w/ Vulture. I just was wondering could you revert it back to my genre structure, nitpicking if you feel the genre isnt as strong as i sought for it to be. Thanks in advance EveryonesFAVORITE*toy (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for any mistake, but nobody is trying to discuss at Talk:Minal Khan (actress) about the article. Is this title will be redirect forever? I mean if the actress meets notability then why every one is restoring redirect? 119.160.117.61 (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- Redirected pages have nothing to do with the nobility of the subject, it's more along the lines of helping to find the subject's page. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- You are right but at that time may be she was not notable of being a stand alone article but now article is well sources. Actress can easily passes WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG but contineously redirected multiple times. Did you saw that article? 119.160.117.61 (talk) 20:30, 1 December 2018 (UTC)