Talk:Open banking: Difference between revisions
Assessment: Finance: class=Start; Software: class=Start; Computer Security: class=Start, importance=Low; +Computing: class=Start, importance=Low, security=y, security-importance=Low (assisted) |
Danainlondon (talk | contribs) Added Some proposed changes |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{WikiProject Computing |class=Start |importance=Low |security=y |security-importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Computing |class=Start |importance=Low |security=y |security-importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
==Some proposed changes== |
|||
{{request edit}} |
|||
Information to be added or removed: To the end of the History section please add However, [[London]]-based [[Financial technology|fintech]] Centtrip found that about three-quarters of medium-sized to large firms surveyed believe they will benefit from Open Banking within the next couple of years, with 64% agreeing that it would save them time and 58% believing it would also save them money. |
|||
Explanation of issue: The section is incredibly biased solely including Mick’s opinion saying that open banking is “a daft idea” when research has been carried out since to prove that not everyone thinks this way. In order to keep neutrality it is important to provide both opinions towards the concept. |
|||
References supporting change: <ref>{{cite web |first1=The Fintech Times |title=Businesses Will Reap the Rewards of Open Banking by 2020 |url=thefintechtimes.com/businesses-open-banking-2020/ |website=The Fintech Times |publisher=Disrupts Media Limited |accessdate=29 January 2019}}</ref> |
|||
[[User:Danainlondon|Danainlondon]] ([[User talk:Danainlondon|talk]]) 10:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:56, 5 February 2019
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Some proposed changes
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Open banking. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Information to be added or removed: To the end of the History section please add However, London-based fintech Centtrip found that about three-quarters of medium-sized to large firms surveyed believe they will benefit from Open Banking within the next couple of years, with 64% agreeing that it would save them time and 58% believing it would also save them money.
Explanation of issue: The section is incredibly biased solely including Mick’s opinion saying that open banking is “a daft idea” when research has been carried out since to prove that not everyone thinks this way. In order to keep neutrality it is important to provide both opinions towards the concept.
References supporting change: [1]
- Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Start-Class Computer Security articles
- Low-importance Computer Security articles
- Start-Class Computer Security articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computer Security articles
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests
- Wikipedia edit requests possibly using incorrect templates