Jump to content

Talk:Open banking: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Finance: class=Start; Software: class=Start; Computer Security: class=Start, importance=Low; +Computing: class=Start, importance=Low, security=y, security-importance=Low (assisted)
Added Some proposed changes
Line 5: Line 5:
{{WikiProject Computing |class=Start |importance=Low |security=y |security-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Computing |class=Start |importance=Low |security=y |security-importance=Low}}
}}
}}

==Some proposed changes==
{{request edit}}

Information to be added or removed: To the end of the History section please add However, [[London]]-based [[Financial technology|fintech]] Centtrip found that about three-quarters of medium-sized to large firms surveyed believe they will benefit from Open Banking within the next couple of years, with 64% agreeing that it would save them time and 58% believing it would also save them money.

Explanation of issue: The section is incredibly biased solely including Mick’s opinion saying that open banking is “a daft idea” when research has been carried out since to prove that not everyone thinks this way. In order to keep neutrality it is important to provide both opinions towards the concept.

References supporting change: <ref>{{cite web |first1=The Fintech Times |title=Businesses Will Reap the Rewards of Open Banking by 2020 |url=thefintechtimes.com/businesses-open-banking-2020/ |website=The Fintech Times |publisher=Disrupts Media Limited |accessdate=29 January 2019}}</ref>

[[User:Danainlondon|Danainlondon]] ([[User talk:Danainlondon|talk]]) 10:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:56, 5 February 2019

Some proposed changes

Information to be added or removed: To the end of the History section please add However, London-based fintech Centtrip found that about three-quarters of medium-sized to large firms surveyed believe they will benefit from Open Banking within the next couple of years, with 64% agreeing that it would save them time and 58% believing it would also save them money.

Explanation of issue: The section is incredibly biased solely including Mick’s opinion saying that open banking is “a daft idea” when research has been carried out since to prove that not everyone thinks this way. In order to keep neutrality it is important to provide both opinions towards the concept.

References supporting change: [1]

Danainlondon (talk) 10:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ [thefintechtimes.com/businesses-open-banking-2020/ "Businesses Will Reap the Rewards of Open Banking by 2020"]. The Fintech Times. Disrupts Media Limited. Retrieved 29 January 2019. {{cite web}}: |first1= missing |last1= (help); Check |url= value (help)