Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 February 11: Difference between revisions
Hiddendigits (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The above is an archive of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page listed in the heading. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>'' |
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The above is an archive of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page listed in the heading. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>'' |
||
|} |
|} |
||
====[[:ThinkMarkets]]==== |
|||
:{{DRV links|ThinkMarkets|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThinkMarkets|article=}} |
|||
Hi All, thank you for your replies regarding ThinkMarkets,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2019_January_30, The Forbes article is independently published by a contributor, here is another link from AFR https://www.afr.com/street-talk/citi-tapped-to-raise-for-online-broker-ahead-of-ipo-20181001-h162io. Due to the nature of the business, most of the publications are done by contributors within the same industry. FCA is not a directory, most of the financial companies are required to be regulated by FCA in order to operate in the UK. (I've reposted my reply as the previous conversation is archived) |
|||
Revision as of 14:20, 11 February 2019
Clarice Phelps
[[:<Clarice Phelps>]]
- [[:<Clarice Phelps>]] ([[|talk]]|[{{fullurl:<Clarice Phelps>|action=edit}} edit]|[{{fullurl:<Clarice Phelps>|action=history}} history]|logs|[[Special:WhatLinksHere/<Clarice Phelps>|links]]|[{{fullurl:<Clarice Phelps>|action=watch}} watch]) ([[Special:Undelete/<Clarice Phelps>|restore]])
No consensus to delete; "at least a few of those recommending keep put forward reasonable arguments that were not fully refuted."The lorax (talk) 14:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Oberlin Academy Preparatory School (closed)
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
|
This AfD was split exactly 50-50 between merge and keep, with extensive rationales for the !votes on both sides. @Ad Orientem: has closed it as "keep" with zero explanation as to why they ignored the significant number of people supporting a merge. Considering where it was at, it would have made most sense to relist it for wider feedback, and at worst, it was a "no consensus" - closing it as "keep" with no rationale amounts to just ignoring the responses made. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
Hi All, thank you for your replies regarding ThinkMarkets,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2019_January_30, The Forbes article is independently published by a contributor, here is another link from AFR https://www.afr.com/street-talk/citi-tapped-to-raise-for-online-broker-ahead-of-ipo-20181001-h162io. Due to the nature of the business, most of the publications are done by contributors within the same industry. FCA is not a directory, most of the financial companies are required to be regulated by FCA in order to operate in the UK. (I've reposted my reply as the previous conversation is archived)