Jump to content

Feminist views on transgender topics: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Reverted to revision 886073869 by Jensis01 (talk): Rv POV (TW)
←Replaced content with 'Nobody cares about this SJW nonsense.'
Tag: Replaced
Line 1: Line 1:
Nobody cares about this SJW nonsense.
{{undue weight|date=November 2018|to=radical feminist views on transgender topics}}
{{Feminism sidebar}}
{{Transgender sidebar}}
'''Feminist views on transgender topics''' range from accepting to critical. [[Feminist movements and ideologies|Some feminists]] such as [[Judith Butler]] and [[Jack Halberstam]] believe that transgender and transsexual people challenge repressive gender norms and that transgender politics are fully compatible with feminism, while others such as [[Janice Raymond]] and [[Sheila Jeffreys]] believe that [[transgender]] and [[transsexual]] people uphold and reinforce sexist [[gender role]]s and the [[gender binary]].
Additionally, some transgender and transsexual people, such as [[Julia Serano]] and [[Jacob Anderson-Minshall]], identify as [[transfeminism|transfeminists]]. Feminists with exclusionary views have been referred to as "TERFs" (short for ''trans-exclusionary radical feminist'').<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/29/im-credited-with-having-coined-the-acronym-terf-heres-how-it-happened|title=I'm credited with having coined the word 'Terf'. Here's how it happened - Viv Smythe|first=Viv|last=Smythe|date=28 November 2018|website=the Guardian}}</ref> They generally object to the acronym<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/02/are-you-now-or-have-you-ever-been-terf|title=Are you now or have you ever been a TERF? |author=Terry MacDonald|date=16 February 2015|website=www.newstatesman.com}}</ref> and have called it a [[pejorative|slur]] or even [[hate speech]].<ref name="ny-what-is-woman"/><ref name="fc-terf-hatespeech"/>

The increased number and public profile of individuals [[Transitioning (transgender)|transitioning]] coincided with [[second-wave feminism]], and so most of the first statements and books were written in the 1970s. They were written with reference mainly to people then known as male-to-female (MTF) transsexuals, who are now frequently called [[trans woman|trans women]].

== Differences in socialization and experience ==

{{as written|Some feminists|reason=Don't stick a 'Who?' template here: the term 'Some feminists' is straight out of the source.}} argue that trans women cannot fully be women because they were [[sex assignment|assigned male]] at birth and experienced some degree of [[male privilege]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Schmidt |first1=Samantha |title=Women’s issues are different from trans women’s issues, feminist author says, sparking criticism|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/03/13/womens-issues-are-different-from-trans-womens-issues-feminist-author-says-sparking-criticism/?noredirect=on |accessdate=11 October 2018 |agency=Washington Post |date=March 13, 2017}}</ref> A view more commonly found in works by radical feminists during the 1970s holds that trans women are men, and trans men are women. For instance Janice Raymond's 1979 book, ''[[The Transsexual Empire]]'', argues that sex roles are fixed from birth based on biological sex, and trans people maintain these roles regardless of their subjective identity.<ref name="newyorker"/>

In 2017, discussing whether trans women are women, [[Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie]] said that "trans women are trans women." She acknowledged transgender women face discrimination on the basis of being transgender and said she sees this as a serious issue, but also said that "we should not conflate the gender experiences of trans women with that of women born female."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/3/15/14910900/chimamanda-ngozi-adichie-transgender-women-comments-apology|title=The controversy over Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and trans women, explained|author=Emily Crockett|date=March 15, 2017|publisher=Vox}}</ref> After sustaining significant criticism for her views, Adichie said the American [[Left-wing politics|Left]] was "creating its own decline" and was "very cannibalistic".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/chimamanda-ngozi-adichie-says-the-american-left-is-creating-its-own-decline_us_59db6dbae4b072637c454c4d|title=Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie Says The American Left ‘Is Creating Its Own Decline’|author=Claire Fallon|date=October 9, 2017|publisher=Huffington Post}}</ref>

Patricia Elliot argues that this perspective assumes that women's experiences are homogeneous, and discounts the possibility that trans and non-trans women may share the experience of being disparaged for femininity.<ref name="Elliot_2004">{{cite journal |last1=Elliot |first1=Patricia |title=Who Gets to Be a Woman?: Feminist Politics and the Question of Trans-inclusion1 |journal=Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice |date=2004 |volume=29 |issue=1 |page=16 |url=http://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/1166 |accessdate=12 October 2018 |quote=The first assumption is that 9 one's socialization as a girl or woman defines "women's experience" as something shared. But this assumption downplays differences among women, as if the sociological norms one identifies as part of a patriarchal gender order are evenly applied to all in one cookie-cutter model, or as if girls and women have the same relationships to those norms. It also fails to ask about possible similarities of experience between trans and non-trans women (both of whom may have been disparaged for their femininity).}}</ref> Similarly, ''Transfeminist Manifesto'' author Emi Koyama counters that, while trans women may have experienced a degree of male privilege prior to transitioning, trans women's experiences are also marked by disadvantages resulting from being trans.<ref name="Koyama_manifesto">{{cite book |last1=Koyama |first1=Emi |title=Transfeminist Manifesto |date=2001 |page=3 |url=http://eminism.org/readings/pdf-rdg/tfmanifesto.pdf |accessdate=12 October 2018}}</ref>

== Feminist and trans issues ==

In 1977 [[Gloria Steinem]] expressed disapproval that the heavily publicized [[Transitioning (transgender)|transition]] of tennis player [[Renée Richards]] (a trans woman) had been characterized as "a frightening instance of what feminism could lead to" or as "living proof that feminism isn't necessary". Steinem wrote, "At a minimum, it was a diversion from the widespread problems of sexual inequality."<ref name="OutrageousActs" />

== Sex reassignment surgery ==

[[Andrea Dworkin]], in her 1974 book ''[[Woman Hating]]'', stated that "every transsexual has the right to survival on his/her own terms. That means every transsexual is entitled to a sex-change operation, and it should be provided by the community as one of its functions."<ref>{{cite book |title= Woman Hating|last= Dworkin|first= Andrea|authorlink= |year= 1974|publisher= [[E. P. Dutton]]|location= New York City|isbn= 0-525-47423-4|page= 186|pages= |url=http://radfem.org/dworkin/}}</ref>

In 1977, Gloria Steinem wrote that while she supported the right of individuals to identify as they choose, in many cases, transgender people "surgically mutilate their own bodies" in order to conform to a gender role that is inexorably tied to physical body parts. She concluded that "feminists are right to feel uncomfortable about the need for and uses of transsexualism." The article concluded with what became one of Steinem's most famous quotes: "If the shoe doesn't fit, must we change the foot?" Although meant in the context of transgender issues, the quote is frequently mistaken as a general statement about feminism.<ref name="OutrageousActs">{{Cite book| last = Steinem| first = Gloria| title = Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions| publisher = Henry Holt & Co.| year = 1984| location = New York| edition = 1st| isbn = 9780805042023}}{{rp|206–210}}</ref> Steinem's statements led to her being characterized as transphobic for some years.<ref name="bm-trans-exclusion-steinem" /> In a 2013 interview with ''[[The Advocate (LGBT magazine)|The Advocate]]'', she repudiated the interpretation of her text as an altogether condemnation of [[sex reassignment surgery]], stating that her position was informed by accounts of gay men choosing to transition as a way of coping with societal [[homophobia]]. She added that she sees transgender people as living "authentic lives" that should be "celebrated".<ref name="advocate-steinem" />

In 1979, [[Janice Raymond]] wrote a book on trans women called ''[[The Transsexual Empire|The Transsexual Empire: The Making of the She-Male]]'', which looked at the role of transsexuality–particularly psychological and surgical approaches to it—in reinforcing traditional gender stereotypes, the ways in which the "medical-psychiatric complex" is medicalizing "gender identity", and the social and political context that has helped spawn transsexual treatment and surgery as normal and therapeutic medicine.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Raymond|first1=Janice G.|title=The transsexual empire : the making of the she-male|date=1994|publisher=Teachers College Press|location=New York|isbn=0807762725|edition=Reissued with a new introduction on transgender}}</ref> Raymond maintains that transsexualism is based on the "patriarchal myths" of "male mothering", and "making of woman according to man's image". She argued that this is done in order "to colonize feminist identification, culture, politics and sexuality," adding: "All transsexuals rape women's bodies by reducing the real female form to an artifact, appropriating this body for themselves.... Transsexuals merely cut off the most obvious means of invading women, so that they seem non-invasive."<ref>Raymond, Janice. (1980). ''The Transsexual Empire'', p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=HwvbAAAAMAAJ&dq=appropriating 104]</ref> Several writers characterized these views as extremely [[transphobia|transphobic]] and constituting hate speech.<ref>Rose, Katrina C. (2004) "[http://www.ifge.org/?q=node/237 The Man Who Would be Janice Raymond]", ''Transgender Tapestry'' 104, Winter 2004</ref><ref>Julia Serano (2007) ''Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity'', pp. 233–234 {{isbn|9781580051545}}</ref><ref>Namaste, Viviane K. (2000) ''Invisible Lives: The Erasure of Transsexual and Transgendered People'', pp. 33–34.{{isbn|9780226568102}}</ref><ref>Hayes, Cressida J., 2003, "Feminist Solidarity after Queer Theory: The Case of Transgender," in ''Signs'' 28(4):1093–1120. {{jstor|10.1086/343132}}</ref>

In her 1987 book ''[[Gyn/Ecology]],'' [[Mary Daly]] expressed negative views of sex change operations, writing, "Today the Frankenstein phenomenon is omnipresent ... in ... phallocratic technology. ... Transsexualism is an example of male surgical siring which invades the female world with substitutes."<ref>Daly, Mary, ''Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism'' (Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, pbk. [1st printing? printing of [19]90?] 1978 & 1990 (prob. all content except ''New Intergalactic Introduction'' 1978 & prob. ''New Intergalactic Introduction'' 1990) ({{ISBN|0-8070-1413-3}})), pp. 70–71 (page break within ellipsis between sentences) (''New Intergalactic Introduction'' is separate from ''Introduction: The Metapatriarchal Journey of Exorcism and Ecstasy'').</ref> "Transsexualism, which Janice Raymond has shown to be essentially a male problem, is an ''attempt'' to change males into females, whereas in fact no male can assume female chromosomes and life history/experience."<ref>Daly, Mary, ''Gyn/Ecology'', ''op. cit.'', p. 238 n.</ref> "The surgeons and hormone therapists of the transsexual kingdom ... can be said to produce feminine persons. They cannot produce women."<ref>Daly, Mary, ''Gyn/Ecology'', ''op. cit.'', p. 68 (n. 60 (at end) omitted).</ref>

In 1999, in the book ''[[The Whole Woman]]'', [[Germaine Greer]] published a sequel to ''[[The Female Eunuch]]''. One chapter was titled "Pantomime Dames", wherein she states her opposition to accepting trans women who were assigned male at birth as women.<ref name = "Greer">{{cite book|last=Greer|first=Germaine|date=1999|title="the whole woman"|publisher=Transworld Publishers Ltd|isbn=0-385-60016-X|page=64|quote=Governments that consist of very few women have hurried to recognise as women men who believe that they are women and have had themselves castrated to prove it, because they see women not as another sex but as a non-sex. No so-called sex-change has ever begged for a [[uterus transplantation|uterus]]-and-[[Transplantable organs and tissues#Ovary|ovaries]] transplant; if uterus-and-ovaries transplants were made mandatory for wannabe women they would disappear overnight. The insistence that man-made women be accepted as women is the institutional expression of the mistaken conviction that women are defective males.}}</ref>

In 2007, [[Julie Bindel]] interviewed a transgender woman in ''[[The Guardian]]'' who said it was “a mistake [...] to have [[sex reassignment surgery|sex-change surgery]] to correct her psychological problems”.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2007/may/23/healthandwellbeing.health|title=Mistaken Identity|author=Bindel, Julie|date=May 23, 2007|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]}}</ref>

==Transfeminism==
{{Main|Transfeminism}}

''Transfeminism'', also written ''trans feminism'', is a category of feminism that synthesizes feminist and transgender discourse. According to Robert Hill, transfeminism has "specific content that applies to transgender and transsexual people, but the thinking and theory of which is also applicable to all women".<ref>{{harvnb|Hill|Childers|Childs|Cowie|2002}}</ref> Transfeminists argue that there are multiple forms of oppression and sexism, and that trans women and [[cisgender women]] have shared interests in combating sexism.<ref name="stanford_bettcher">{{cite encyclopedia| last = Bettcher| first = Talia| encyclopedia = Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy| title = Feminist Perspectives on Trans Issues| url = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-trans/| access-date = October 13, 2018| language = English| year = 2009}}</ref>

Influential transfeminists include [[Julia Serano]], Diana Courvant, and Emi Koyama. In 2006, the first book on transfeminism, ''Trans/Forming Feminisms: Transfeminist Voices Speak Out'' edited by Krista Scott-Dixon, was published.<ref>{{cite web|title=Trans/forming Feminisms: Transfeminist Voices Speak Out [Paperback]|url=https://www.amazon.com/Trans-forming-Feminisms-Transfeminist-Voices/dp/1894549619}}</ref>

==Feminist support==

Trans-inclusive feminists, such as [[Akwugo Emejulu]] and Alison Phipps, support trans people's right to self-identification.<ref>Patrick Strudwick, ''[https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwick/meet-the-feminist-academics-championing-trans-rights Meet The Feminist Academics Championing Trans Rights]'', ''Buzzfeed News'', December 22, 2018</ref> In a 2015 interview, [[Catharine Mackinnon]] cited and agreed with [[De Beauvoir]]'s quotation about "[[:q:Simone de Beauvoir#The Second Sex (1949)|becom[ing] a woman]]", and said that {{nowrap|"[a]nybody}} who identifies as a woman, wants to be a woman, is going around being a woman, as far as I'm concerned, is a woman."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.transadvocate.com/sex-gender-and-sexuality-the-transadvocate-interviews-catharine-a-mackinnon_n_15037.htm|title=Sex, Gender, and Sexuality: The TransAdvocate interviews Catharine A. MacKinnon|author=Cristan Williams|date=April 7, 2015|publisher=The TransAdvocate}}</ref>

In her 1974 book ''[[Woman Hating|Woman Hating: A Radical Look at Sexuality]]'', radical feminist writer and activist [[Andrea Dworkin]] called for the support of transsexuals, whom she viewed as "in a state of primary emergency" due to "the culture of male–female discreteness". She writes: "every transsexual has the right to survival on his/her own terms. That means every transsexual is entitled to a sex-change operation, and it should be provided by the community as one of its functions." However, she also stated that the phenomenon of transsexuality might disappear in a free society, giving way to new modes of sexual identity and behavior.<ref>{{cite book |title= Woman Hating|last= Dworkin|first= Andrea|authorlink= |year= 1974|publisher= [[E. P. Dutton]]|location= New York City|isbn= 0-525-47423-4|page= 186|pages= |url=http://radfem.org/dworkin }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://archive.feministtimes.com/%e2%80%aa%e2%80%8egenderweek-andrea-was-not-transphobic/ |title=#GenderWeek: Andrea was not transphobic |author=John Stoltenberg |publisher=Feminist Times }}</ref>

In a 2014 interview, [[Judith Butler]] argued for civil rights for trans people: "[N]othing is more important for transgender people than to have access to excellent health care in trans-affirmative environments, to have the legal and institutional freedom to pursue their own lives as they wish, and to have their freedom and desire affirmed by the rest of the world." Moreover, she responded to some of [[Sheila Jeffreys]] and [[Janice Raymond]]'s criticisms of trans people, calling their criticisms "prescriptivism" and "tyranny". According to Butler, trans people are not created by medical discourse but rather develop new discourses through self-determination.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Butler|first1=Judith|last2=Williams|first2=Cristan|title=Gender Performance: The TransAdvocate interviews Judith Butler|url=http://www.transadvocate.com/gender-performance-the-transadvocate-interviews-judith-butler_n_13652.htm|website=The TransAdvocate|publisher=The TransAdvocate|accessdate=24 July 2015}}</ref>

[[Margaret Atwood]] has stated<!-- to ''[[The Guardian]]''--> that when she hears the label ''feminist'', "it is always – 'What do you mean by the word?' For instance, some feminists have historically been against lipstick and letting transgender women into women's washrooms. Those are not positions I have agreed with."<ref>Lisa Allardice, ''[https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jan/20/margaret-atwood-i-am-not-a-prophet-science-fiction-is-about-now Margaret Atwood: ‘I am not a prophet. Science fiction is really about now’]'', in ''[[The Guardian]]'', January 20, 2018</ref> She continued,<!--to ''[[The Irish Times]]''--> "I'm not the kind [of feminist] that thinks that trans women are not women."<ref>Catherine Conroy, ''[https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/margaret-atwood-when-did-it-become-the-norm-to-expect-a-porn-star-on-the-first-date-1.3408922 Margaret Atwood: ‘When did it become the norm to expect a porn star on the first date?’]'', in ''[[The Irish Times]]'', March 1, 2018</ref>

In March 2019, more than 70 women including [[Emma Thompson]] and [[Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)|members of the UK parliament]] cosigned an [[open letter]] stating that "trans people have played an integral role in every civil rights movement to date; from LGBT equality to women's causes", saying "as a woman and a proud feminist, I know that advancing trans rights does not threaten my womanhood or my feminism", and that "defining womanhood by conforming to strict biological and physical attributes has been fought against by strong women long before my time. To now see some advocate that trans women are denied their rights and their dignity on these very grounds, I believe would be a devastating step back for women and for feminism."<ref>Stephen Paton, ''[https://www.thenational.scot/news/17472564.they-do-not-speak-for-us-feminists-hit-back-at-trans-exclusionary-activists-in-open-letter/ They do not speak for us: Feminists hit back at trans-exclusionary activists in open letter]'', March 3, 2019, ''[[The National (Scotland)|The National]]''</ref><ref>Hannah Rodger, ''[https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/17472457.women-hit-back-at-archaic-and-damaging-views-on-transgender-rights-in-scathing-open-letter/ Women hit back at 'archaic and damaging' views on transgender rights in scathing open letter]]'', March 3, 2019, ''[[The Herald (Glasgow)|The Herald]]''</ref>

==Feminist exclusion of trans women==

===General===
{{See also|Radical feminism#Views on transgender topics}}

[[Radical feminism|Radical feminists]] generally see gender as a social class system in which women are oppressed due to their biology, rather than a supposed innate femininity. As a result, some radical feminists are critical of the notion that "trans women are women".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Michelle |first1=Goldberg |title=The Trans Women Who Say That Trans Women Aren’t Women |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2015/12/gender_critical_trans_women_the_apostates_of_the_trans_rights_movement.html |website=Slate |accessdate=16 September 2018}}</ref>

In 1978, trans woman [[Sandy Stone (artist)|Sandy Stone]], who worked as a sound engineer for [[Olivia Records]], resigned over the controversy of a trans woman working for a lesbian-identified enterprise, precipitating feminist debate over trans women.<ref name="sayer">{{cite web|url=https://www.thefreelibrary.com/From+Lesbian+Nation+to+Queer+Nation-a018158328|title=From Lesbian Nation to Queer Nation|last=Sayer|first=Susan|date=1995-10-01|website=|publisher=Hecate|archive-url=https://philpapers.org/rec/SAYFLN|archive-date=2018-09-11|dead-url=no|accessdate=2012-10-03}}</ref> The debate continued in Raymond's book,<ref name="Raymond 1994">{{cite book | title=The Transsexual Empire | publisher=Teachers College Press | last=Raymond | first=J. | quote=The second edition includes a new foreword that describes her anti-trans work after the publication of her thesis project as the first edition in the late 70s. | year=1994 | edition=2nd}}</ref> which devoted a chapter to criticism of "the transsexually constructed lesbian-feminist". Groups like [[Lesbian Organization of Toronto]] (LOOT) then voted to exclude trans lesbians<ref name="ross1995">Ross, Becki (1995). ''The House that Jill Built: A Lesbian Nation in Formation.'' University of Toronto Press, {{ISBN|978-0-8020-7479-9}}</ref> and include only [[womyn-born womyn]]. A formal request to join the organization was made by a trans lesbian in 1978; in response, the organization voted to exclude trans women. During informal discussion, members of L.O.O.T. expressed their outrage that in their view a "sex-change he-creature...dared to identify himself as a woman and a lesbian." In their public response, LOOT wrote, "A woman's voice was almost never heard as a woman's voice – it was always filtered through men's voices. So here a guy comes along saying, "I'm going to be a girl now and speak for girls." And we thought, 'No you're not.' A person cannot just join the oppressed by fiat."<ref name="ross1995"/>

Another site of conflict between feminists and trans women was the [[Michigan Womyn's Music Festival]] (MichFest). It ejected a transgender woman, Nancy Burkholder, in the early 1990s.<ref name="vangelder">Van Gelder, Lindsy; and Pamela Robin Brandt. "The Girls Next Door: Into the Heart of Lesbian America", p. 73. Simon and Schuster, {{ISBN|978-0-684-83957-8}}</ref> From that point on, the festival maintained that it was intended for "womyn-born womyn".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://michfest.com/festival_community_statements.htm|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006161540/http://michfest.com/festival_community_statements.htm|title=Michigan Womyn's Music Festival: Community Statements|archivedate=6 October 2014|publisher=MichFest|accessdate=30 December 2017}}</ref> Activist group [[Camp Trans]] formed to protest this policy and to advocate for greater acceptance of trans women within the feminist community. A number of prominent transgender activists and transfeminists were involved in Camp Trans, including [[Riki Wilchins]], Jessica Xavier, and [[Leslie Feinberg]].{{Citation needed|date=October 2012}} MichFest considered allowing post-operative trans women to attend; however, this was criticized as [[Class discrimination|classist]], as many trans women cannot afford sex reassignment surgery.<ref>{{cite book | year=2006 | author=Hand, Michael|author2= Sreedhar, Susanne | chapter=The Ethics of Exclusion: Gender and Politics at the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival | editor-first=Krista | editor-last=Scott-Dixon | title=Trans/Forming Feminisms: Trans/Feminist Voices Speak Out | publisher=Sumach Press | location=Toronto | pages=164–65 | isbn=1-894-54961-9 | oclc=70839321}}</ref> Lisa Vogel, the MichFest organizer, said that protesters from Camp Trans responded to the ejection of Burkholder with vandalism.<ref name="newyorker">{{cite journal|last1=Goldberg|first1=Michelle|title=What Is a Woman?|journal=The New Yorker|date=August 4, 2014|url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/08/04/woman-2|accessdate=November 20, 2015}}</ref> The festival ended in 2015.

There was also a long-running dispute in Canada involving access to a [[women-only space]]. Kimberly Nixon volunteered for training as a rape crisis counselor at [[Vancouver Rape Relief & Women's Shelter]] in 1995. When Nixon's trans status was determined, she was expelled. The staff decided that Nixon's status made it impossible for her to understand the experiences of their clients, and required their counselors to be genetically female. Nixon disagreed, disclosing her own history of partner abuse and sued on the grounds of discrimination. Nixon's attorneys argued that there was no basis for the dismissal, citing Diana Courvant's experiences as the first publicly trans woman to work in a women-only [[domestic violence shelter]]. In 2007 the [[Canadian Supreme Court]] refused to hear Nixon's appeal, ending the case.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.egale.ca/index.asp?lang=E&menu=34&item=1147 |title=Background on Nixon v Vancouver Rape Relief |publisher=[[Egale Canada]] |accessdate=2012-10-03 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120207160530/http://www.egale.ca/index.asp?lang=E&menu=34&item=1147 |archivedate=2012-02-07 |df= }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rapereliefshelter.bc.ca/issues/nixon/jan082001_lakeman.pdf |title=Excerpt from Proceedings |publisher= |date=2001-01-08 |accessdate=2013-11-02|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081002100647/http://www.rapereliefshelter.bc.ca/issues/nixon/jan082001_lakeman.pdf|archivedate=2008-10-02}}</ref><ref name="perelle">
Perelle, Robin (February 14, 2007). [https://www.dailyxtra.com/rape-relief-wins-19610 Rape Relief wins: Supreme Court refuses to hear trans woman's appeal.]'' [[Xtra!|Xtra]]''</ref>

Germaine Greer was appointed as a special lecturer and fellow at [[Newnham College, Cambridge]], where she unsuccessfully opposed the election to a fellowship of her transgender colleague [[Rachael Padman]]. Greer argued that Padman had been born male, and therefore should not be admitted to Newnham, [[single-sex education|a women's college]]. Greer resigned in 1996 after the case attracted negative publicity.<ref>[http://www.pfc.org.uk/news/1997/gfolly02.htm In the news:1997] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060625052911/http://www.pfc.org.uk/news/1997/gfolly02.htm |date=June 25, 2006 }} Press For Change.org.uk</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com:80/people/bc/1999/06/22/greer |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010601071715/http://www.salon.com:80/people/bc/1999/06/22/greer |dead-url=yes |archive-date=2001-06-01 |title=Brilliant Careers – Germaine Greer |publisher=Salon.com |date=1999-06-22 |accessdate=2009-07-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Burwell |first1=Ian |title=Germaine Greer, profile: Writer who has not backed down from fight with transgender community |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/germaine-greer-profile-writer-who-has-not-backed-down-from-fight-with-transgender-community-a6742721.html |accessdate=10 October 2018 |agency=The Independent |date=November 20, 2015}}</ref>

In 2017, 60-year-old woman was left bruised after a scuffle broke out at [[Speakers' Corner]] between pro-trans activists and a group of feminists who were protesting potential changes to the [[Gender Recognition Act]]. One pro-trans protester was later convicted of assault in relation to the incident.<ref name="speakers-corner"/><ref>{{cite news|title=Feminist activist denies trying to 'out' transgender woman who 'punched' her|url=https://news.sky.com/story/feminist-activist-denies-trying-to-out-transgender-woman-who-punched-her-11327720|accessdate=6 May 2018|work=Sky News|date=12 April 2018}}</ref>

The 2018 [[Pride in London]] march was disrupted by a small group of lesbians calling themselves ''Get the L Out''. The group carried banners with the phrases 'Lesbian = Female Homosexual', 'Lesbian not Queer', and 'Transactivism Erases Lesbians', while giving out leaflets stating that LGBTQ politics had failed lesbians and was contributing to lesbian erasure and compulsory heterosexuality.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/anti-trans-protest-london-pride-parade-lgbt-gay-2018-march-lesbian-gay-rights-a8436506.html |title=London Pride: Anti-trans activists disrupt parade by lying down in street to protest 'lesbian erasure' |publisher=The Independent |date=July 7, 2018 }}</ref> A member of the group described their motivation as follows: "We protested the LGBT movement as a whole and Pride specifically because many lesbians feel erased and betrayed by a movement which claimed to represent us. The L in 'LGBT' is meaningless when the LGBT organisations claim that a man can identify as 'lesbian.'"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://conatusnews.com/pride-london-lesbian-activism/ |title=What Really Happened With Lesbian Protestors At Pride London Yesterday? |publisher=Conatus News |date=July 8, 2018 }}</ref> The group was condemned as transphobic or "anti-trans" by several news outlets, and the organizers of Pride in London published a public apology, condemning the group of "a level of bigotry, ignorance and hate that is unacceptable."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/08/london-pride-organisers-say-sorry-after-anti-trans-group-leads-march |title=Pride organisers say sorry after anti-trans group leads march |publisher=The Guardian |date=July 8, 2018}} {{pb}} {{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-44757403 |title=Pride in London sorry after anti-trans protest |publisher=BBC News |date=July 8, 2018}} {{pb}} {{cite web|url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/07/08/pride-in-london-condemns-anti-trans-protest-as-vile-says-we-are-sorry/ |title=Pride in London condemns anti-trans protest as ‘vile’: ‘We are sorry’ |publisher=Pink News |date=July 8, 2018}} {{pb}} {{cite web|url=https://prideinlondon.org/news/2018/7/8/statement-from-pride-in-london-regarding-the-2018-protest-group |title=Statement from Pride in London regarding the 2018 protest group |publisher=Pride in London }}</ref> There had been a similar protest at [[Auckland Pride Festival]] a few months earlier, with a banner saying "Stop giving kids sex hormones - protect lesbian youth".<ref>{{cite news |title=ANTI-TRANSGENDER PROTESTERS TARGET AUCKLAND PRIDE PARADE |url=https://gayexpress.co.nz/2018/02/anti-transgender-protesters-target-auckland-pride-parade/ |accessdate=21 January 2019 |publisher=Gay Express |date=February 2018}}</ref>

===The term "TERF" ===

The term "TERF" was coined by feminist Viv Smythe, also known as tigtog on the blog Hoyden About Town, in August 2008.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/29/im-credited-with-having-coined-the-acronym-terf-heres-how-it-happened|title=I'm credited with having coined the word 'Terf'. Here's how it happened - Viv Smythe|first=Viv|last=Smythe|date=28 November 2018|publisher=|via=www.theguardian.com}}</ref> Smythe said in the interview with Cristan Williams that she believes that she and Lauredhel coined it some time prior as a chat shorthand. It is an acronym for "trans exclusionary radical feminist". It is used to describe feminists who oppose the inclusion of trans women in women's spaces and organizations,<ref name="bm-trans-exclusion"/><ref name="spectator-terf"/> or dispute that trans women are women.<ref name="Inside-Higher-Ed"/> Smythe noted that "it was meant to be a deliberately technically neutral description of an activist grouping. We wanted a way to distinguish TERFs from other RadFems with whom we engaged who were trans*-positive/neutral, because we had several years of history of engaging productively/substantively with non-TERF RadFems."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://read.dukeupress.edu/tsq/article-abstract/3/1-2/254/91781/Radical-InclusionRecounting-the-Trans-Inclusive|title=Radical Inclusion: Recounting the Trans Inclusive History of Radical Feminism|date=1 May 2016|publisher=Duke University Press|author=Cristan Williams}}</ref> Cristan Williams from ''The Transadvocate'' argues that the term references "a brand of ‘radical feminism’ that is so rooted in sex essentialism and its resulting biologism, it actively campaigns against the existence, equality, and/or inclusion of trans people."<ref name="williams-terf"/><ref name="dalbey_terfwars">{{cite news |last1=Dalbey |first1=Alex |title=TERF wars: Why trans-exclusionary radical feminists have no place in feminism |url=https://www.dailydot.com/irl/terf-meaning/ |accessdate=27 January 2019 |work=Daily Dot |date=August 12, 2018}}</ref> Critics of the term, such as journalist and commentator Sarah Ditum, say it is a mischaracterization of their positions and a slur.<ref name="ny-what-is-woman"/><ref name="bm-trans-exclusion"/><ref name="cp-sex-gender"/><ref name="ns-terf-ditum"/>

Writing for the ''[[New Statesman]]'', Ditum said the term was too widely used, writing that "the bar to being called a 'terf' is remarkably low".<ref name="ns-terf-ditum-lowbar"/> Claire Heuchan, criticizing the [[No Platform|deplatforming]] of [[Linda Bellos]] from Cambridge University on grounds of her perceived transphobia, said that "TERF" was often used alongside violent rhetoric, and used to dehumanize women who are critical of gender.<ref name="guardian-heuchan-terf"/> She said the term obscured who was responsible for violence against transgender people: "The term 'terf' and the violent rhetoric that often accompanies it only serve to obscure the reality: women and trans people alike are targets of male violence. To make radical feminists the villains is to blame men’s violence on women’s thoughts."<ref name="guardian-heuchan-terf"/>

Sociolinguist [[Deborah Cameron (linguist)|Deborah Cameron]] wrote in 2016 that it had evolved from all-caps to lower case ("terf"), and from functioning as an [[acronym]] to an ordinary word. She concludes that it "does not meet all the criteria that have been proposed for defining a word as a slur, but it does meet most of them at least partially." She said that it is used "in a kind of discourse which has clear similarities with hate-speech...[so] it seems to me impossible to maintain that it is ‘just a neutral description’."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Cameron |first1=Deborah |title=What makes a word a slur? |url=https://debuk.wordpress.com/2016/11/06/what-makes-a-word-a-slur/ |website=language: a feminist guide |accessdate=21 January 2019 |language=en |date=6 November 2016}}</ref>

In 2018, the use of the word in an edition of ''[[Philosophy and Phenomenological Research]]'' led to a letter of protest from [[feminist philosophy|feminist philosophers]].<ref name="Inside-Higher-Ed">{{cite news |title=Philosophers object to a journal's publication 'TERF,' in reference to some feminists. Is it really a slur? |url=https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/08/29/philosophers-object-journals-publication-terf-reference-some-feminists-it-really |accessdate=21 January 2019 |work=www.insidehighered.com |language=en}}</ref> Philosopher Rachel McKinnon disagreed with those who she said "ludicrously, claim that ‘TERF’ is a misogynistic slur.”<ref name="Inside-Higher-Ed"/>

=== Criticism of trans-exclusionary viewpoints ===

Queer feminist philosopher Judith Butler has argued for feminist solidarity with trans and [[Gender variance|gender-nonconforming]] people, and has been critical of philosophers, such as Sheila Jeffreys, who she argues engage in oppressive attempts to dispute trans people's sense of identity.<ref name="butler_interview_2015">{{cite news |last1=Butler |first1=Judith |title=Judith Butler on gender and the trans experience: "One should be free to determine the course of one’s gendered life" |url=https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2009-judith-butler-on-gender-and-the-trans-experience-one-should-be-free-to-determine-the-course-of-one-s-gendered-life |accessdate=10 October 2018 |publisher=Verso Books |date=May 26, 2015}}</ref>

A 2004 piece by Julie Bindel titled "Gender Benders, beware" was printed in ''[[The Guardian]]'' concerning her anger about a [[rape crisis centre]]'s dispute with a transsexual rape counselor; the article also expressed her views about transsexuals and transsexualism.<ref name="GBB" /> Many considered the language used to be offensive and demeaning. ''The Guardian'' received more than two hundred letters of complaint from transgender people, doctors, therapists, academics and others. Transgender activist group [[Press for Change]] cite this article as an example of 'discriminatory writing' about transsexual people in the press.<ref name="PFCGBB">[http://www.pfc.org.uk/node/1293#de Media Issues] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090415193152/http://pfc.org.uk/node/1293 |date=2009-04-15 }} Press for Change – PfC examples of press coverage</ref> Complaints focused on the title, "Gender benders, beware", the cartoon<ref name="CARTOON">{{cite web | url = http://img9.photobucket.com/albums/v27/feebee/bindel.jpg | title = Facsimile of 'Gender Benders, Beware' from 'The Guardian' showing cartoon | date = 31 January 2004|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160125091340/http://img9.photobucket.com/albums/v27/feebee/bindel.jpg|archivedate=January 25, 2016}}</ref> accompanying the piece,<ref name="PFCRESP">Claire McNab [https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20061116120000mp_/http://www.pfc.org.uk/pfclists/news%2Darc/2004q1/msg00061.htm Re: UK: Gender benders, beware]<!-- page not archived. see https://web.archive.org/web/20041011112700/http://www.pfc.org.uk:80/pfclists/news-arc/index.htm --> [The Guardian] McNab's reaction to PfC list on article</ref> and the disparaging tone, such as "Think about a world inhabited just by transsexuals. It would look like the set of ''Grease''" and "I don't have a problem with men disposing of their genitals, but it does not make them women, in the same way that shoving a bit of vacuum hose down your 501s [jeans] does not make you a man."<ref name="GBB">{{citation| last = Bindel| first = Julie| title = Gender Benders, beware| publisher = The Guardian| date = 31 January 2004| url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/jan/31/gender.weekend7}}</ref>

As of 2009, Bindel reportedly still maintained that "people should question the basis of the diagnosis of male psychiatrists, 'at a time when [[gender role|gender polarisation]] and [[homophobia]] work hand-in-hand.'"<ref name="CSOTP"/> She argued that "Iran carries out the highest number of sex change surgeries in the world" (see [[Transsexuality in Iran]]) and that "surgery is an attempt to keep [[gender stereotypes]] intact".<ref name="CSOTP">{{Citation| last1 = Grew| first1 = Tony| title = Celebs split over trans protest at Stonewall Awards| date = 7 November 2008| url = http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-9523.html}}</ref> Bindel responded to celebrities being split on transgender protests at the [[Stonewall Awards]] and commented on how the LGBT movement had developed since her early days as a radical lesbian feminist. She suggested that the protest was as much about "[[Stonewall (charity)|Stonewall]] for refusing to add the T (for transsexual) on to the LGB (for lesbian, gay and bisexual)",<ref name=BINMIY>{{Citation| last1 = Bindel| first1 = Julie| title = It's not me. It's you| work = The Guardian| date = 8 October 2008| url = https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/nov/08/lesbianism}}</ref> and that "the idea that certain distinct behaviours are appropriate for males and females underlies feminist criticism of the phenomenon of 'transgenderism'."<ref name="CSOTP"/> Following the Stonewall protest [[Stephen Whittle]] invited her to debate these issues again with [[Susan Stryker]], an American academic and transsexual activist, in front of an audience at [[Manchester Metropolitan University]] on 12 December 2008. The debate was broadcast live on the internet.

In 2012, [[Sheila Jeffreys]] wrote in ''The Guardian'' that she and others who "criticised transgenderism, from any academic discipline" had been subjected to internet campaigns to ban their speaking because of alleged "transhate, transphobia, hate speech". She wrote that the "degree of vituperation and the energy expended by the activists may suggest that they fear the practice of transgenderism could justifiably be subjected to criticism, and might not stand up to rigorous research and debate, if critics were allowed to speak out."<ref>Sheila Jeffreys, [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/may/29/transgenderism-hate-speech Let us be free to debate transgenderism without being accused of 'hate speech'], published in [[The Guardian]], May 29, 2012. The article was a response to Roz Kaveney, [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/may/25/radical-feminism-trans-radfem2012 Radical feminists are acting like a cult], [[The Guardian]], 25 May 2012.</ref>

When [[Linda Bellos]] was invited to speak at Cambridge University in 2017, she told the organizers that she would be "publicly questioning some of the trans politics...which seems to assert the power of those who were previously designated male to tell lesbians, and especially lesbian feminists, what to say and think."<ref name="linda-bellos" /> She was subsequently disinvited from speaking. Asked by ''[[The Times]]'' for comment, Bellos reiterated: "I'm not being told by someone who a few months ago was a man what I as a woman can or cannot do." Claire Heuchan, writing for ''The Guardian'', lamented the university's decision to disinvite Bellos, opining: "When feminists who have spent decades challenging sexism, racism, and homophobia are viewed as a risk to the wellbeing of students, something has gone very wrong indeed."<ref name="guardian-heuchan"/>

==See also==
{{divcol|colwidth=20em}}
* [[Feminine essence concept of transsexuality]]
* [[Feminist movements and ideologies]]
* [[Feminist sex wars]]
* [[Feminist views on BDSM]]
* [[Feminist views on pornography]]
* [[Feminist views on prostitution]]
* [[Feminist views on sexuality]]
* [[Gender essentialism]]
* [[Misogyny]]
* [[Trans-misogyny]]
* [[Transphobia]]
{{div col end}}

==References==
{{reflist|colwidth=30em|refs=

<ref name="bm-trans-exclusion-steinem">{{cite news | url=http://bitchmagazine.org/post/the-long-history-of-transgender-exclusion-from-feminism | title=It's Time to End the Long History of Feminism Failing Transgender Women | work=[[Bitch Media]] | date=February 17, 2014 | accessdate=April 18, 2014 | author=Vasquez, Tina | quote=Steinem was long considered transphobic because of the stance she took in writing about professional tennis player Renée Richards, who transitioned in the 1970’s. Steinem’s 1983 book Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellion cited Janice Raymond’s work and discussed how transsexuals “mutilate their own bodies.”}}</ref>

<ref name="advocate-steinem">{{cite web
|url=http://www.advocate.com/commentary/2013/10/02/op-ed-working-together-over-time
|title=On Working Together Over Time
|author=Steinem, Gloria
|date=October 2, 2013
|publisher=The Advocate
|quote=Years passed the Internet arrived, and words circulated out of time and context. Last year one young transgender student on campus assumed that old essay’s use of the word “mutilate” for surgeries performed because of societal pressure meant I was against sexual reassignment surgery altogether. He didn’t consider that it had been written two generations before he was born, and also in the context of global protests against routine surgical assaults, called female genital mutilation by some survivors.{{pb}}{{pb}}So now I want to be unequivocal in my words: I believe that transgender people, including those who have transitioned, are living out real, authentic lives. Those lives should be celebrated, not questioned. Their health care decisions should be theirs and theirs alone to make. And what I wrote decades ago does not reflect what we know today as we move away from only the binary boxes of “masculine” or “feminine” and begin to live along the full human continuum of identity and expression.
}}</ref>

<ref name="ny-what-is-woman">{{cite journal|last1=Goldberg|first1=Michelle|title=What Is a Woman?|journal=The New Yorker|date=August 4, 2014|url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/08/04/woman-2|accessdate=November 20, 2015|quote=TERF stands for “trans-exclusionary radical feminist.” The term can be useful for making a distinction with radical feminists who do not share the same position, but those at whom it is directed consider it a slur.}}</ref>

<ref name="fc-terf-hatespeech">{{cite web|url=http://www.feministcurrent.com/2017/09/21/terf-isnt-slur-hate-speech/ | title=‘TERF’ isn’t just a slur, it’s hate speech | author=Meghan E. Murphy | publisher=Feminist Current | date=September 21, 2017 | quote=If “TERF” were a term that conveyed something purposeful, accurate, or useful, beyond simply smearing, silencing, insulting, discriminating against, or inciting violence, it could perhaps be considered neutral or harmless. But because the term itself is politically dishonest and misrepresentative, and because its intent is to vilify, disparage, and intimidate, as well as to incite and justify violence against women, it is dangerous and indeed qualifies as a form of hate speech. While women have tried to point out that this would be the end result of “TERF” before, they were, as usual, dismissed. We now have undeniable proof that painting women with this brush leads to real, physical violence. If you didn’t believe us before, you now have no excuse.}}</ref>

<ref name="linda-bellos">
{{cite web |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/linda-bellos-barred-in-cambridge-university-row-0pbdq5sm9 |title=Linda Bellos barred in Cambridge University row |author=James Gillespie |author2=Sian Griffiths |publisher=The Sunday Times |date=October 1, 2017 }}
{{pb}}
{{cite web |url=http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cambridge-news/linda-bellos-politician-cambridge-barred-13716790 |title=Cambridge University has uninvited this feminist speaker after these comments |author=Anna Savva |publisher=Cambridge News |date=October 5, 2017 }}
{{pb}}
{{cite web |url=https://www.varsity.co.uk/news/13638 |title=Exclusive: Linda Bellos ‘disappointed’ by Beard Society ban |author=Rachel Loughran |author2=Anna Menin |publisher=Varsity |date=October 5, 2017 }}
</ref>

<ref name="guardian-heuchan">{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/06/feminist-linda-bellos-women-trans-male-violence |title=If feminist Linda Bellos is seen as a risk, progressive politics has lost its way |author=Claire Heuchan |publisher=The Guardian |date=October 6, 2017 }}</ref>

<ref name="bm-trans-exclusion">{{cite news | url=http://bitchmagazine.org/post/the-long-history-of-transgender-exclusion-from-feminism | title=It's Time to End the Long History of Feminism Failing Transgender Women | work=[[Bitch Media]] | date=February 17, 2014 | accessdate=April 18, 2014 | author=Vasquez, Tina | quote=Drawing from that history, Brennan, fellow attorney Elizabeth Hungerford, and other modern-day feminists continue to actively question the inclusion of trans people in women’s spaces. These feminists refer to themselves as “radical feminists” or “gender critical feminists.” In 2008, trans women and trans advocates started referring to this group as “trans-exclusionary radical feminists” or TERFs, a term Brennan considers a slur.}}</ref>

<ref name="spectator-terf">{{cite web | url=https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/05/terf/ |title=Terf wars and the ludicrous lexicon of feminist theory |author=Dot Wordsworth |publisher=The Spectator |date=May 5, 2018}}</ref>

<ref name="williams-terf">{{cite web |url=http://www.transadvocate.com/you-might-be-a-terf-if_n_10226.htm |title=You might be a TERF if… |date=24 September 2013 |publisher=TransAdvocate |author=Cristan Williams }}</ref>

<ref name="ns-terf-ditum-lowbar">{{cite web |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2017/09/what-terf-how-internet-buzzword-became-mainstream-slur |title=What is a Terf? How an internet buzzword became a mainstream slur |author=Sarah Ditum |publisher=The New Statesman |date=September 29, 2017 |quote= On the other hand, if you are a feminist, the bar to being called a “terf” is remarkably low. Woman’s Hour presenter Jenni Murray achieved it by writing an article in which she pointed out that someone born and raised male will not have the same experiences of sexism as a woman; novelist Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie likewise made the grade by answering “transwomen are transwomen” when asked whether she believed that “transwomen are women”.}}</ref>

<ref name="cp-sex-gender">{{cite web | url=http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/08/02/sex-is-not-gender/ | title=Sex is Not Gender | publisher=[[CounterPunch]] | date=2–4 August 2013 | accessdate=10 August 2014 | author=Hungerford, Elizabeth | quote=Make no mistake, this is a slur. TERF is not meant to be explanatory, but insulting. These characterizations are hyperbolic, misleading, and ultimately defamatory. They do nothing but escalate the vitriol and fail to advance the conversation in any way.}}</ref>

<!-- <ref name="cp-keith-jensen">{{cite web | url=https://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/21/55123/ | title=The Emperor’s New Penis | publisher=CounterPunch | date=June 21, 2013 | author=Lierre Keith|author2= Derrick Jensen }}</ref> -->

<ref name="speakers-corner">{{cite web | url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2017/09/trans-rights-terfs-and-bruised-60-year-old-what-happened-speakers-corner | title=Trans rights, TERFs, and a bruised 60-year-old: what happened at Speakers’ Corner? | publisher=New Statesman | date=September 14, 2017 | author=Anoosh Chakelian }}
{{pb}}
{{cite web | url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/trans-group-ath-condones-punching-feminists-n6mz06pj3 | title=Trans group ATH ‘condones punching feminists’ | publisher=The Sunday Times | date=September 24, 2017 | author=James Gillespie }}
{{pb}}
{{cite web | url=http://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/misogynist-violence-speakers%E2%80%99-corner | title=Misogynist violence at Speakers’ Corner | publisher=Morning Star | date=September 18, 2017 | author=Jen Izakson }}</ref>

<ref name="ns-terf-ditum">{{cite web | url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2017/09/what-terf-how-internet-buzzword-became-mainstream-slur | title=What is a Terf? How an internet buzzword became a mainstream slur | publisher=New Statesman | date=September 29, 2017 | author=Sarah Ditum}}</ref>

<ref name="guardian-heuchan-terf">{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/06/feminist-linda-bellos-women-trans-male-violence |title=If feminist Linda Bellos is seen as a risk, progressive politics has lost its way |author=Claire Heuchan |publisher=The Guardian |date=October 6, 2017 |quote=Terf stands for trans-exclusionary radical feminist. Online, it often it appears alongside violent rhetoric: punch a Terf, stab a Terf, kill a Terf. This language is used to dehumanise women who are critical of gender as part of a political system. }}</ref>
}}

==External links==
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-trans/ Feminist Perspectives on Trans Issues]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20131004222539/http://www.gendercentre.org.au/resources/polare-archive/archived-articles/helps-and-hindrances.htm Help Hindrances and the Indifference of Feminism]

==Further reading==
* Jeffreys, Sheila. ''Gender Hurts: A Feminist Analysis of the Politics of Transgenderism.'' London : Routledge, 2013. {{ISBN|0-415-53940-4}}
* Califia, Patrick. ''Sex Changes: The Politics of Transgenderism'', San Francisco, Calif. : Cleis Press, 1997. {{ISBN|1-573-44072-8}}

{{Feminism}}
{{Transgender}}

[[Category:Feminism and transgender| ]]

Revision as of 02:49, 9 March 2019

Nobody cares about this SJW nonsense.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Feminist_views_on_transgender_topics&oldid=886874773"