Jump to content

Talk:Irreligion in Russia: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.1)
We should make a specific page named: The personhood of god as examined by Russian scholars
Line 19: Line 19:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

== Please add Russian analysis of the [[personhood]] of god ==

Is [[personhood]] more fundamental than the Universe?<br>
Can a person (for example god) be shaped without an environment?<br>
[[Information theory]] doesn't apply to the thinking process of god?<br>

Add specific links of Russian atheists and theists.<br>
We should make a specific page named: [[The personhood of god as examined by Russian scholars]]<br>
It's not weird to be analytical about a specific field of study.<br>
It's weird and improper to be lazy.

Revision as of 10:36, 11 March 2019

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconRussia Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconAtheism Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.


To do

Join WikiProject atheism and be bold.

Be consistent

  • Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles).
  • Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
  • Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Articles to improve

Create

  • Articles on notable atheists


Expand

Immediate attention

  • State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
  • False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
  • Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes.
  • Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.

Is this true?

See poll here concerning Pussy Riot case, surely most Russians aren't secular or they wouldn't have approved of this - http://www.levada.ru/31-07-2012/rossiyane-o-dele-pussy-riot

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Irreligion in Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add Russian analysis of the personhood of god

Is personhood more fundamental than the Universe?
Can a person (for example god) be shaped without an environment?
Information theory doesn't apply to the thinking process of god?

Add specific links of Russian atheists and theists.
We should make a specific page named: The personhood of god as examined by Russian scholars
It's not weird to be analytical about a specific field of study.
It's weird and improper to be lazy.