Jump to content

User talk:PC78: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 47: Line 47:
quickie - 2nd entry at DAB stil has three blue links. In target film, is "Joseph Dubin" not "Joe Dubin" as in DAB. Ignore this if not active and I will do, but giving you first dibs. "Joe Dubin (composer)" is piped. [[Special:Contributions/94.21.234.169|94.21.234.169]] ([[User talk:94.21.234.169|talk]]) 23:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
quickie - 2nd entry at DAB stil has three blue links. In target film, is "Joseph Dubin" not "Joe Dubin" as in DAB. Ignore this if not active and I will do, but giving you first dibs. "Joe Dubin (composer)" is piped. [[Special:Contributions/94.21.234.169|94.21.234.169]] ([[User talk:94.21.234.169|talk]]) 23:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
:{{ping|94.21.234.169}} Piped link is fine per [[MOS:DABMENTION]]. Should probably only be one blue link but in this case it's not obvious which artilce is the most relevant; it was written by both men, for (though not used in) the film. Article is at [[Joe Burke (composer)]] but perhaps he was credited as Joseph Burke in the film? Don't know, but not sure that it matters. Before the dab page was linking to [[Joseph A. Burke]] who is someone else entirely! [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78#top|talk]]) 00:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
:{{ping|94.21.234.169}} Piped link is fine per [[MOS:DABMENTION]]. Should probably only be one blue link but in this case it's not obvious which artilce is the most relevant; it was written by both men, for (though not used in) the film. Article is at [[Joe Burke (composer)]] but perhaps he was credited as Joseph Burke in the film? Don't know, but not sure that it matters. Before the dab page was linking to [[Joseph A. Burke]] who is someone else entirely! [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78#top|talk]]) 00:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
::Thank you, was in hurry as I saw you actively editing and already had EC at WP:RM so stood off. All well and good. You're right piped link is fine specifically but not generqlly per[[WP:DABPIPE}]] i.e. don't make something more ambiguous in an attempt to keep the DAB clean-lookin'. You will see I scrubbed my support but that is based on the DAB being pretty useless with the entries as they were, thanks for fixing those. [[Special:Contributions/94.21.234.169|94.21.234.169]] ([[User talk:94.uatioz21.234.169|talk]]) 00:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
::Thank you, was in hurry as I saw you actively editing and already had EC at WP:RM so stood off. All well and good. You're right piped link is fine specifically but not generqlly per[[WP:DABPIPE]] i.e. don't make something more ambiguous in an attempt to keep the DAB clean-lookin'. You will see I scrubbed my support but that is based on the DAB being pretty useless with the entries as they were, thanks for fixing those. I got wrong which one was "(composer)" in my haste, thanks for the AGF there. [[Special:Contributions/94.21.234.169|94.21.234.169]] ([[User talk:94.uatioz21.234.169|talk]]) 00:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:02, 12 March 2019

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Korean name

Template:Infobox Korean name has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox Chinese. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 22:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Woo Seung-yeon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No strong case for notability. Only roles were minor in two films and only one of the films is bluelink. Refs note that she was passed over for several roles. Instead, the theme of the refs, which are solely retrospectives reporting on her suicide, is that she was only a minor actress who had not become a major star.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 02:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Insignia

Sorry to bother you, but I am giving you a friendly "ping" as you have an "Oppose" !vote at Talk:Insignia#Requested move 5 February 2019. I added some RS to the article. This may or may not address your concerns, but I just wanted to let you know now it is an elapsed listing, and it seems like the consensus is to move it into main (imperfect as it is) so you may wish to comment. I added some sources as you and another editor pointed out, but I try to translate verbatim before doing anything else, and there were no sources in the Spanish original. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 21:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, blow me, in the time I was typing this it got moved over. Sorry to bother you! 178.164.162.144 (talk) 21:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Hello PC78, regarding your recent two requested movie was so complicated, I noticed that before you request those pages was moved by you. My advice is if you are unable to complete the moves then request a series moves so that sysop or page movers can move without leaving a redirect which is an easy way.

Example first move request

  1. Two Weddings and a Funeral to Two Weddings and a Funeral (Tru Calling)
  2. Two Weddings and a Funeral (film) to Two Weddings and a Funeral

Example second move request

  1. Life Is Cool to Life Is Cool (song)
  2. Life Is Cool (film) to Life Is Cool

Top of that Two Weddings and a Funeral (Tru Calling) was redirect to Two Weddings and a Funeral (film) and Life Is Cool (song) was redirect to Adagio (Sweetbox album). I request you to keep open your eyes for all these things. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 05:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ZI Jony: Fair enough on the second one, the first I didn't know I couldn't complete until I'd already got so far. I'm not convinced you didn't make it more complicated than it needed to be: you've managed to swap the talk page histories for Talk:Two Weddings and a Funeral (Tru Calling) and Talk:Two Weddings and a Funeral for no particular reason. Thanks anyway though! :) PC78 (talk) 09:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing (with tears in my eyes)

quickie - 2nd entry at DAB stil has three blue links. In target film, is "Joseph Dubin" not "Joe Dubin" as in DAB. Ignore this if not active and I will do, but giving you first dibs. "Joe Dubin (composer)" is piped. 94.21.234.169 (talk) 23:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@94.21.234.169: Piped link is fine per MOS:DABMENTION. Should probably only be one blue link but in this case it's not obvious which artilce is the most relevant; it was written by both men, for (though not used in) the film. Article is at Joe Burke (composer) but perhaps he was credited as Joseph Burke in the film? Don't know, but not sure that it matters. Before the dab page was linking to Joseph A. Burke who is someone else entirely! PC78 (talk) 00:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, was in hurry as I saw you actively editing and already had EC at WP:RM so stood off. All well and good. You're right piped link is fine specifically but not generqlly perWP:DABPIPE i.e. don't make something more ambiguous in an attempt to keep the DAB clean-lookin'. You will see I scrubbed my support but that is based on the DAB being pretty useless with the entries as they were, thanks for fixing those. I got wrong which one was "(composer)" in my haste, thanks for the AGF there. 94.21.234.169 (talk) 00:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]