Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality in Bangladesh: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Keep |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Keep''' The article as it stands is no more than an outline for a topic that could be developed considerably. However what’s already there looks properly sourced to me. It does look like a loose collection of stuff that the creator has pulled together under the umbrella of ‘Sexuality’ so I searched to see whether the topic ‘Sexuality in Bangladesh’ is itself notable, and it clearly is as there are plenty of research studies in this field. So while the article needs improvement, I don’t see a case for deletion. [[User:Mccapra|Mccapra]] ([[User talk:Mccapra|talk]]) 05:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' The article as it stands is no more than an outline for a topic that could be developed considerably. However what’s already there looks properly sourced to me. It does look like a loose collection of stuff that the creator has pulled together under the umbrella of ‘Sexuality’ so I searched to see whether the topic ‘Sexuality in Bangladesh’ is itself notable, and it clearly is as there are plenty of research studies in this field. So while the article needs improvement, I don’t see a case for deletion. [[User:Mccapra|Mccapra]] ([[User talk:Mccapra|talk]]) 05:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''' As per Mccapra's reasoning. --[[User:John B123|John B123]] ([[User talk:John B123|talk]]) 08:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''' As per Mccapra's reasoning. --[[User:John B123|John B123]] ([[User talk:John B123|talk]]) 08:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep'''. The article needs to be elaborated. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-unsor-1 --><!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> '''[[User:TBF 93|<span style="color:#68829E; font-family:Segoe UI; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #C4DFE6">TBF 93</span>]] ([[User_talk:TBF 93|<span style="color:#A2C523;">talk</span>]])''' 15:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:09, 30 May 2019
- Sexuality in Bangladesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Given references are not strong enough about the topic. Shoikot H (talk) (cont) 13:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 May 25. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The article as it stands is no more than an outline for a topic that could be developed considerably. However what’s already there looks properly sourced to me. It does look like a loose collection of stuff that the creator has pulled together under the umbrella of ‘Sexuality’ so I searched to see whether the topic ‘Sexuality in Bangladesh’ is itself notable, and it clearly is as there are plenty of research studies in this field. So while the article needs improvement, I don’t see a case for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 05:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As per Mccapra's reasoning. --John B123 (talk) 08:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. The article needs to be elaborated. TBF 93 (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)