User talk:MBarness1234: Difference between revisions
Decline unblock |
MBarness1234 (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 10:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)}} |
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 10:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)}} |
||
:Yes you can appeal a block, and in fact you are currently doing this. However, this appeal will probably be declined, as it doesn't address the block reason, which was ''Abusing [[WP:SOCK|multiple accounts]]: Please see: [[w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alwaysrightman]]''. There is a guide on appealing blocks at [[WP:GAB]]. [[User:Jannik Schwaß|Jannik Schwaß]] ([[User talk:Jannik Schwaß|talk]]) 06:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC) |
:Yes you can appeal a block, and in fact you are currently doing this. However, this appeal will probably be declined, as it doesn't address the block reason, which was ''Abusing [[WP:SOCK|multiple accounts]]: Please see: [[w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alwaysrightman]]''. There is a guide on appealing blocks at [[WP:GAB]]. [[User:Jannik Schwaß|Jannik Schwaß]] ([[User talk:Jannik Schwaß|talk]]) 06:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock | reason=I would like to appeal against my block on the basis that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I have been blocked on the belief that I am associated with another user called Alwaysrightman who engaged in disruptive editing to the [[Stephen Hendry]] page and was, as I understand, permanently blocked. This is not the case. I recognise that I have attempted to make similar edits to that applied by Alwaysrightman as I agree with the basis of his/her edits. However, please note that debates about the status of the achievements of the subject of the Wikipedia page (Stephen Hendry) go beyond a few editors or Wikipedia itself. Importantly, what distinguishes me from Alwaysrightman is that I do not agree with the manner in which he/she has attempted to make their edits and have instead engaged in a discussion with other editors on the [[Stephen Hendry]] talk page. I would like to have my block removed so I can engage in these discussions and resolve the issue rather than seeing other editors like Alwaysrightman enter into an edit war. [[User:MBarness1234|MBarness1234]] ([[User talk:MBarness1234#top|talk]]) 11:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 11:50, 7 July 2019
![]() | This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Alwaysrightman (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth | ![]() |
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)
July 2019
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Stephen Hendry shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Rutebega (talk) 21:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Block
I appear to have been blocked for making a similar edit to another editor who has been blocked, thus suggesting I am the same user. I can assure I have no connections with other editors and, as a snooker fan, am simply trying to create consistency between two pages. This is a debate which goes beyond a few editors and Wikipedia. I am actively engaged in a discussion with other editors and therefore politely ask that my account be unblocked so this can be resolved. MBarness1234 (talk) 22:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
@Rutebega: Message text. MBarness1234 (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- MBarness1234, to appeal your block you will need to ask ST47 (talk · contribs). Read WP:GAB for more information. —Rutebega (talk) 22:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
@ST47: Please can I appeal against my block. I am currently in active discussions with other editors on the Stephen Hendry talk page to try to resolve this ongoing edit issue and cannot participate whilst my account is blocked. MBarness1234 (talk) 23:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
MBarness1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please can I appeal against my block. I am currently in active discussions with other editors on the Stephen Hendry talk page to try to resolve this ongoing edit issue and cannot participate whilst my account is blocked.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Yes you can appeal a block, and in fact you are currently doing this. However, this appeal will probably be declined, as it doesn't address the block reason, which was Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alwaysrightman. There is a guide on appealing blocks at WP:GAB. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 06:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
MBarness1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to appeal against my block on the basis that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I have been blocked on the belief that I am associated with another user called Alwaysrightman who engaged in disruptive editing to the [[Stephen Hendry]] page and was, as I understand, permanently blocked. This is not the case. I recognise that I have attempted to make similar edits to that applied by Alwaysrightman as I agree with the basis of his/her edits. However, please note that debates about the status of the achievements of the subject of the Wikipedia page (Stephen Hendry) go beyond a few editors or Wikipedia itself. Importantly, what distinguishes me from Alwaysrightman is that I do not agree with the manner in which he/she has attempted to make their edits and have instead engaged in a discussion with other editors on the [[Stephen Hendry]] talk page. I would like to have my block removed so I can engage in these discussions and resolve the issue rather than seeing other editors like Alwaysrightman enter into an edit war. [[User:MBarness1234|MBarness1234]] ([[User talk:MBarness1234#top|talk]]) 11:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to appeal against my block on the basis that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I have been blocked on the belief that I am associated with another user called Alwaysrightman who engaged in disruptive editing to the [[Stephen Hendry]] page and was, as I understand, permanently blocked. This is not the case. I recognise that I have attempted to make similar edits to that applied by Alwaysrightman as I agree with the basis of his/her edits. However, please note that debates about the status of the achievements of the subject of the Wikipedia page (Stephen Hendry) go beyond a few editors or Wikipedia itself. Importantly, what distinguishes me from Alwaysrightman is that I do not agree with the manner in which he/she has attempted to make their edits and have instead engaged in a discussion with other editors on the [[Stephen Hendry]] talk page. I would like to have my block removed so I can engage in these discussions and resolve the issue rather than seeing other editors like Alwaysrightman enter into an edit war. [[User:MBarness1234|MBarness1234]] ([[User talk:MBarness1234#top|talk]]) 11:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to appeal against my block on the basis that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I have been blocked on the belief that I am associated with another user called Alwaysrightman who engaged in disruptive editing to the [[Stephen Hendry]] page and was, as I understand, permanently blocked. This is not the case. I recognise that I have attempted to make similar edits to that applied by Alwaysrightman as I agree with the basis of his/her edits. However, please note that debates about the status of the achievements of the subject of the Wikipedia page (Stephen Hendry) go beyond a few editors or Wikipedia itself. Importantly, what distinguishes me from Alwaysrightman is that I do not agree with the manner in which he/she has attempted to make their edits and have instead engaged in a discussion with other editors on the [[Stephen Hendry]] talk page. I would like to have my block removed so I can engage in these discussions and resolve the issue rather than seeing other editors like Alwaysrightman enter into an edit war. [[User:MBarness1234|MBarness1234]] ([[User talk:MBarness1234#top|talk]]) 11:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}