Talk:Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Kautilya3 moved page Talk:Indian revocation of special status to Jammu and Kashmir to Talk:Indian revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status: grammatical correction |
Blorper234 (talk | contribs) changed quality scale, as it was previously "category", which is obviously incorrect |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Indo-Pakistani WPCB}} |
{{Indo-Pakistani WPCB}} |
||
{{WP India |
{{WP India |
||
|class= |
|class=Start |
||
|importance=NA |
|importance=NA |
||
|jandk=yes |
|jandk=yes |
Revision as of 15:43, 8 August 2019
![]() | This article is within the scope of the Indian and Pakistani Wikipedians cooperation board. Please see the project page for more details, to request intervention on the notification board or peruse other tasks. |
![]() | India: Jammu and Kashmir Start‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | Pakistan Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Grammar: Indian revocation of special status to Jammu and Kashmir
Is "to" the correct preposition in the title? Usually we revoke something from something. "Dessert was revoked from Jeff for bad behavior." Or "resulted in the revocation of the Store Manager title from Jeff." Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, good point Cyphoidbomb. Unfortunately, "from" doesn't sit right in this context. After mulling over the alternatives, I guess I will bite the bullet and add an apostrophe. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Indian and Pakistani Wikipedians cooperation board
- Start-Class India articles
- NA-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of NA-importance
- Start-Class Jammu and Kashmir articles
- Unknown-importance Jammu and Kashmir articles
- Start-Class Jammu and Kashmir articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Unassessed Pakistan articles
- Unknown-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles