Talk:Yavarum Nalam: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:53, 7 September 2019

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: Indian Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Horror Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 October 2007. The result of the discussion was delete.

Controversy

Why no mention of the O Sexy Mama - Censor board controversy?--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remake

I am not able to find any official press release from Weinstein to this effect. Delete? REINCARNUT (I'm over here) - You gotta do what you gotta do. —Preceding undated comment added 16:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Reception

From the starting paragraph: "Released on 6 March 2009, the film received highly positive reviews. Rediff called the film as one of the best films of 2009.[3]"

Later: "The film received mixed reviews from critics." ... "Rediff.com rated the film 2 out of 5 stars and said, "One simply wishes it didn't have to be such hard work getting to the point, for the filmmakers as well as the audience."[9]"

Uh?

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 I am not able to find any official press release from Weinstein to this effect. Delete? [[User:Reincarnut|<small>'''<span style="background:Black;color:Gold"> &nbsp;REINCARNUT&nbsp;</span>'''</small>]]  [[User talk:Reincarnut|<small>(I'm over here)</small>]] - ''You gotta do what you gotta do.''  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 16:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Reception ==
+From the starting paragraph: "Released on 6 March 2009, the film received highly positive reviews. Rediff called the film as one of the best films of 2009.[3]"
+Later: "The film received mixed reviews from critics." ... "Rediff.com rated the film 2 out of 5 stars and said, "One simply wishes it didn't have to be such hard work getting to the point, for the filmmakers as well as the audience."[9]"
+Uh?