Talk:Gnetum: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:10, 9 September 2019

Plants Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classification

Is there any known history about Gnetum classification?--Hannu 12:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Gnetales redirects here, and the article states that Gnetum is the sole genus included in Gnetales, but at least some classifications consider Gnetales to include Ephedra and Welwitschia. No time to deal with it right now. MrDarwin 00:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still an issue

This is the quote from Wikipedia's article on Welwitschia:
"Most recent systems place Welwitschia mirabilis in its own family Welwitschiaceae in the gymnosperm order Gnetales.[8]"
But I'm not enough of a botanist to edit this article. Oaklandguy (talk) 23:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy update

Updated the taxonomy per Price, R. A. (1996). Systematics of the Gnetales: A review of morphological and molecular evidence. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 157(6): S40-S49. Two species included in the previous list but not included in Price's treatment are Gnetum catasphaericum and Gnetum giganteum. And of course there is the 2000 proposal to move many of these species to the older genus Thoa. Doesn't seem to have gained any traction, however. --Rkitko ^(talk) 03:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Ukazi" and "Okazi"

Okazi redirects to Gnetum africanum. Ukazi redirects here. I'm assuming these are common names; but no mention of these names are made in the respective articles. What's going on here? Eman 235/talk 05:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New section Gnetum sect. Cylindrostachys and messed up classification

Dear colleagues, it seem that User:RhinoMind introduced with the last standing edit from 30th july 2019 additional sect. Cylindrostachys, and that is consistent with classification on Wikispecies. However the previous division and classification is left unaltered. By that he did create many double entries ... where some (most species) are listed in both the previous classification order and wikispecies-like classification.

I am not up to the task to find out or decide, which classification is to be used, so I'd like to atract attention of someone who can clean it up. --Reo On (talk) 15:10, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 [[Okazi]] redirects to [[Gnetum africanum]]. [[Ukazi]] redirects here. I'm [https://www.google.com/webhp#q=ukazi assuming] these are common names; but no mention of these names are made in the respective articles. What's going on here? <span style="font-family: sylfaen">[[User:Eman235#top|<font color="green">E'''man'''</font>]][[Special:Contribs/Eman235|<font color="#6643d1">2'''35'''</font>]]/[[User talk:Eman235#top|<font color="brown">''talk''</font>]]</span> 05:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
+== New section Gnetum sect. Cylindrostachys and messed up classification ==
+Dear colleagues, it seem that [[User:RhinoMind]] introduced [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gnetum&diff=prev&oldid=908582211 with the last standing edit from 30th july 2019] additional ''sect. Cylindrostachys'', and that is consistent with classification on Wikispecies. However the previous division and classification is left unaltered. By that he did create many double entries ... where some (most species) are listed in both the previous classification order and wikispecies-like classification.
+I am not up to the task to find out or decide, which classification is to be used, so I'd like to atract attention of someone who can clean it up. --[[User:Reo On|Reo On]] ([[User talk:Reo On|talk]]) 15:10, 9 September 2019 (UTC)