Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital empathy: Difference between revisions
Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) |
Asargana96 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Delete''' (without prejudice to it being completely rewritten, properly sourced, and reduced to about a 3rd of its current size.) Written very much like a [[term paper]] (and probably is/was one) and/or synthesis, partly in the creator's own words, of material harvested from the many sources. See [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 07:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' (without prejudice to it being completely rewritten, properly sourced, and reduced to about a 3rd of its current size.) Written very much like a [[term paper]] (and probably is/was one) and/or synthesis, partly in the creator's own words, of material harvested from the many sources. See [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 07:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''' It's a valid topic and AfD (still) isn't for cleaning up article quality. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 10:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''' It's a valid topic and AfD (still) isn't for cleaning up article quality. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 10:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC) |
||
[[User:Asargana96|Asargana96]] ([[User talk:Asargana96|talk]]) 00:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC) Keep: Thankyou for everyone's suggestions.Please see the edited version, i've made changes based on the feedback. Please review and let me know if more changes need to be made. Thanks. |
|||
Revision as of 00:40, 17 September 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Digital empathy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This essay comprises a great deal of original research and synthesis. A GSearch of "Digital empathy" returns one reliable source in the form of a paper in the medical field from 2015 with 18 citations, the remaining results being the name of an unrelated veterinarian clinic, a Medium.com entry, a Wix site, a Forbes.com contributor article, this article, and a couple of articles of like ilk. (LinkedIn, etc.)
The paper is Terry & Cain, 2015 located here. If the concept described therein is notable (and it doesn't seem to be related to the stuff in the Medium and Forbes.com articles), and this article is kept, then the article will have to be cleaned up. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 07:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 07:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 07:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete (without prejudice to it being completely rewritten, properly sourced, and reduced to about a 3rd of its current size.) Written very much like a term paper (and probably is/was one) and/or synthesis, partly in the creator's own words, of material harvested from the many sources. See WP:OR. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep It's a valid topic and AfD (still) isn't for cleaning up article quality. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Asargana96 (talk) 00:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC) Keep: Thankyou for everyone's suggestions.Please see the edited version, i've made changes based on the feedback. Please review and let me know if more changes need to be made. Thanks.