Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 6: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Moreschi (talk | contribs)
Line 37: Line 37:


has recreated the Twilight material '''yet''' again at [[Twilight A.K.A. Tha Futcha]]. You might like to sort this out. Best, [[User:Moreschi|Moreschi]] 10:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
has recreated the Twilight material '''yet''' again at [[Twilight A.K.A. Tha Futcha]]. You might like to sort this out. Best, [[User:Moreschi|Moreschi]] 10:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


== Deletion? ==

What was wrong with that article that has been deleted

Revision as of 14:18, 3 December 2006

Archives:

Please add all comments below the line.


FRUSTRATED! I guess I need to start over

Kinda rude to get bumped in the middle of fixing an article, but I've heard that about wikipedia. I guess the article was deleted on the off chance that somebody just might be searching this site for an obscure reference I just happen to be writing about at the same time. I also guess that somebody has to be the rude one or else they'd let anybody contribute here. I promise I'll do my homework nest time. Job well done.--Micktissue 03:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Keep up the lovely work. I hope to be active as soon as I can get some computer issues straightened out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff503 (talkcontribs)

Golodomor redirect

Might I ask why did you delete the important redirect which is a Russian translit of the name. Please don't do that. --Kuban Cossack 13:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block of 209.139.133.90

Hello, Could you please tell me how long this IP is blocked for, so I can add the appropriate template? It looks like you blocked the IP. Thanks --Bezking 21:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

speedy of Wikipedia:Catholic Encyclopedia cat Euro Dioceses

Neither you nor DB placer indicated which of the 3 kinds of specific G7 situation applied, nor how its situation is "like" those three. (And i was reverting to pre-tagged version w/ invalid tags.} IMO your action is blatantly out of process and should be remedied by

  1. undeletion, or
  2. retroactively attaching further info to the deleted revisions; this could be done by either undeleting, or creating a new dummy under the title, and in either case then deleting that w/ summary providing the needed info.

--Jerzyt 03:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


What is wrong with my Okanogan County Commando page, who decides what is important? Charlie Yusi

has recreated the Twilight material yet again at Twilight A.K.A. Tha Futcha. You might like to sort this out. Best, Moreschi 10:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion?

What was wrong with that article that has been deleted