Talk:Direct method (education): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:14, 6 October 2019

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Education Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merits

The merits of the natural method need a serious overhaul. First of all, its written poorly, with a multitude of grammatical and orthographical errors. Just as problematic, however, is also the anglosentrical way it’s been written. CannedMan (talk) 07:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the "merit/demerit" layout, while understandable, is rather stylistically different from the typical wikipedia article, and may warrant some restructuring for consistency if nothing else. --Argenteus.CG (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weaknesses

What are this method weakness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.58.251.91 (talk) 21:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Direct method is a method of teaching language directly establishing a direct or immediate association between experience and expression, between the English word, phrase or idiom and its meaning through demonstration, dramatization without the use of the mother tongue[3]

Aims[edit] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.252.30 (talk) 08:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 The merits of the natural method need a serious overhaul. First of all, its written poorly, with a multitude of grammatical and orthographical errors. Just as problematic, however, is also the anglosentrical way it’s been written.
 [[User:CannedMan|CannedMan]] ([[User talk:CannedMan|talk]]) 07:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
+Additionally, the "merit/demerit" layout, while understandable, is rather stylistically different from the typical wikipedia article, and may warrant some restructuring for consistency if nothing else. --[[User:Argenteus.CG|Argenteus.CG]] ([[User talk:Argenteus.CG|talk]]) 19:14, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 == Weaknesses ==