User talk:Jimfbleak

Jim	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	Logs	Blocks	Deletions	Protections	Scripts	Bird talk	Commons

Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.

Request for editing

Hello! I initially wrote a problematic article titled "Agatha Bacelar" which you had removed. After looking through the article I realized its flaws and that it did not follow NPOV. I continued to re-write the article, trying to aim for clarity and a neutral tone. Before I make the article go live, I would love to receive some comments or edits on how I can further improve the article. I want to create a trusted article that can genuinely contribute to wikipedia. Your expertise would greatly help me better my article! Thank you for the consideration. 2607:F140:6000:16:D510:4D0:40A8:1C9 (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC) maschristi

Replied on User talk:Maschristi, promo by likely COI editor Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Deleted page

Could you please email me a copy of the text/references you deleted so that I may attempt revisions? Please email to mgm_77@yahoo.com. Thank you! 2600:1702:1410:AA20:685F:E926:D240:11BF (talk) 20:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)ProfStan

2600:1702:1410:AA20:685F:E926:D240:11BF, this is the only edit you have made on Wikipedia, no idea what you are talking about Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:25, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Buckland & Taylor

Barkis419 (talk) 21:33, 17 November 2019 (UTC) A year ago you kindly helped me deal with a draft article on the Canadian bridge design company Buckland & Taylor which operated from 1972-2015. I had started in the Wikipedia but before I had gotten very far it had been denounced as propaganda and deleted. You moved it into the Draft area and provided some guidance. I have worked on it further and now it is, I hope, an acceptable asset that can be moved out of Draft status. A dilemma with any account of creative and design work whether literature, art, sculpture, or engineering design is that the creators' accounts provide good insight into whatever it is. However, Wikipedia policy rightly emphasizes use of neutral independent sources. I have tried to provide a reasonable and acceptable balance. Please will you take a look and, if you are willing, move it to the public Wikipedia or suggest how best I should proceed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Buckland_%26_Taylor Thank-you for your patience. Barkis419

Replied on user talk page atUser talk:Barkis419 Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

About now deleted article Suka Pinakurat

Hi Jim from this warm spring evening in Melbourne.
The article looked OK to me up until the now blocked Special:Contributions/SukaPinakurat...
Oh, wait on - already fixed. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Bhagvan singh meena

Same editor recreated the vanity page once again, this time under Bhagwan Meena to avoid the SALTing. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC).

GPL93, thanks. TomStar81 beat me to the indef! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Inquiry about deleted page

Hello there Jim!

I recently constructed an article titled "Mount Vernon (Company)" that was tagged for speedy deletion & then shortly after deleted. I would first like to request that my draft page please be recovered so I can edit it further for review and appeal. I also saw the reasoning for this decision tagged as a violation of Wikipedia rules against Advertising & Self Promotion. I want to make sure that I am appropriately adhering to the guidelines for proper, unbiased reporting on articles. So far I've tried to keep the article as unbiased & objective as possible; give readers an accurate, sourced depiction of the facts regarding company operations, notable achievements in the professional field by our members and company history. Mount Vernon Co is an officially registered LLC based out of Los Angeles that operates in the music industry & like-minded business ventures; and currently has RIAA 5x platinum certified artists/producers running under the label arm as well as strong connections and documented working history with various Record Labels (Atlantic, RocNation, Interscope, Warner Chappell, Republic), Music Publishing Companys & known Public Entities (Artists, Musicians, Designers, ETC). We would like another chance to objectively establish ourselves in the public domain clearly for more people to be properly educated and aware of who we are and what we do. Also as far as having proper direct articles from third party sources. Mount Vernon Co itself is still fairly new in its formation (EST 2017) but the members who comprise the company all have distinguished accolades with legitimate sources to back the information provided. I look forward to hearing back from you, and thank you for your time!

Mainey Maineywhiles (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Replied on user talk page, spam for non-notable company Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2019

2409:4062:2E99:ABE:C533:D2B0:12C3:2DEA (talk) 12:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

2409:4062:2E99:ABE:C533:D2B0:12C3:2DEA, I assume you mean Archita Sahu, I can't see that it's being vandalised, please clarify Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

COI

Jatindramalik (talk) 08:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC) hii actualy I am employee of the organisation ,thats why I am making this page dont dielet this article <ref>www.skyyriderinstitutions.com</ref>

Jatindramalik, thanks for that, but the page is already deleted. I've already put on your talk page what you need to do if you wish to write about a topic where you have a COI Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi

Hello, Jimfbleak. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Jugni (talk) 14:55, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Jugni, it will be a while before I can have a proper look, but it's still an obvious fanpage. Take para 3 of AKhuwat, for example, it's completely unsourced, highly promotional The desire to be the best and the urge to put in extraordinary effort to achieve his goals defined him from early years and an irrelevant external link to a page about his brother Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Yes, totally agreed and remove the unnecessary text. Please see the rest. Jugni (talk) 15:38, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Jugni, I've made these changes, including indicating where citations are needed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, thanks i've added the citation and some more content with proper citation. Thanks for adding much beauty to my draft, it looks good now. Also please guide me how to copy draft to normal wiki page?? Jugni (talk) 17:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Jugni, don't copy, use the "move" tab to move to article space Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

CPNL

I don't agree with the deletion of that page since it is the translation of an existing page in Catalan and Spanish and it is a relevant institution for the teaching of a language. Moreover, that translation was done by people who aren't linked, at all, with the institution. Ecremcort (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Replied at user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:50, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

BioNTech

Hi Jim, from my point of view, I did not use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising (BioNTech). I have tried to fulfill all the WIkipedia criteria in the revision of the article and honestly do not understand this reaction. This page should not be speedily deleted because BioNTech is a reputable biotechnology company that explores new approaches to cancer therapy and has generated really important medical science insights. The company should therefore be included in the Wikipedia encyclopaedia. The earlier, deleted article has been extensively (!) revised. The current article is neutral, contains no obvious advertising and does not violate any copyright rights (the Sec report is publicly available, it has been referenced but not cited). I think a speedy deletion is inappropriate and urge you to reconsider this decision (a lot of meticulous research and time has gone into creating the article). Before a deletion, therefore, the responsible persons should intensively deal with the contents of the article and the background of the company. In my view, it should be about the encyclopaedic recording of important advances in medicine (and also companies that generate these advances). The intention to delete the entry is incomprehensible to me - can you help me understand?. Thank you and have a nice evening Bodysana (talk) 16:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Bodysana I don't think you have helped yourself by repeatedly recreating without discussing with the deleting admins. However, I'll have a look again to see if my deletion needs to be reconsidered, or alternatively explain why it was not acceptable. However, I haven't got time now, so it will probably be tomorrow. Looking at your editing pattern, it seems likely that you have a Conflict of interest, which our T&C mandate that you must declare or risk a block if you don't, so in the interim you could consider that issue Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Jimfbleak Dear Jim, thank you so much for the quick answer and help! Actually, I'm still a beginner at Wikipedia and there were no problems with my articles on other medical-scientific entries :-). In fact, in my case, there is no conflict of interest - I'm a bit unsure now what to do to avoid this impression ... In any case, thank you very much (!!) for reviewing the article, I am looking forward to your feedback. All the best Bodysana (talk) 17:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Jimfbleak Hi Jim, thanks for your feedback. Would it make sense that I re-create the article in the next few weeks at Special:Mypage/BioNTech and ask other editors to help work on it? --Bodysana (talk) 08:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

I forgot to say that I also ran the tool excluding the sec report site, and it flagged up 23% from other pages, which on its own we might let pass, but it's obviously problematic taking them together. Nothing to stop you trying again and it makes sense to take some time on it. Incidentally, you don't need the {{u|Jimfbleak}} ping here, I'm automatically notified of messages on my own talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Van Eaton Galleries Deletion

Hi Jim, I recently saw that you got my page deleted due to the article following under the G11 rule. I don't really know exactly why you thought that it was a promotion because the article was written as an informational page of history. Please let me know where I can get the information I put in the page and if possible undelete the page. I had written it very similar to the Wikipedia page "Profiles in History" so if this follow's rule G11 then so does that wikipedia page. Thanks for your time. TwitchGenius (talk) 21:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)