User talk:Apollo1203

File:Amir Khusrau ngram for title change.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amir Khusrau ngram for title change.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:07, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Acharya Discussion

With your reference I think I agree that Bhadresdas swami should be considered as an Acharya. However reference for Adi Shankracharya, Madhavacharya, Ramanujaacharya, Madhavacharya is not sufficient; reference don't talk about how those 4 received title of Acharya. There is no strong evident that explains if Adi Shankracharya, Madhavacharya, Ramanujacharya was honored by someone or somebody for doing the work. Here, we're ignoring the fact that Bhadresdas Swami was honored where as others in the list where not honored by anyone. I hope you look at this based on evidence. Thank you --16:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Sanatandharmaway (talk)

Amir Khusrow

Please note that there are correct procedures for moving an article. The whole article needed to be moved together with the edit history so that attribution can be preserved. Do not cut and paste content when you move. If you cannot do it yourself, then let other people do it if there is no objection to the move proposal after the discussion closed. Hzh (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

I think you are messing up the move procedure, doing things that you should not do - you should not have close it yourself, and you have not have closed it so soon. Please read the link given in the talk page on the closing procedure. It is meant to be done by others. Hzh (talk) 19:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

I have replied on the article talk page. Thank you for assisting in this process! Apollo1203 (talk) 04:50, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

BLP policy

Please read and understand wp:BLPSPS. We do not use partisan sources to justify statements about those parties, no matter if those parties say they speak with the voice of authority. LeadSongDog come howl! 22:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the note. I've added sources from scholarly publications and will continue to refine the resources from independent reliable sources. Thank you! Apollo1203 (talk) 22:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Morari Bapu

I appreciate you willing to set aside your differences at the moment to help us achieve neutrality. WP:BLPPUBLIC made things clear to me about why we should include these remarks. Let me know what you think after reading it. Moksha88 (talk) 05:06, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jiva, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 16:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you - I will find appropriate sources and re-edit the paragraph. Apollo1203 (talk) 20:44, 30 November 2019 (UTC)