Talk:Conrad (name): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:53, 3 January 2020

Anthroponymy Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proto-Germanic

Hello all,

Is anyone else also dissatisfied with the 'Proto-Germanic' terms given?

Two issues to discuss:

1) They are clearly not PGmc forms as produced by linguists. A more appropriate representation would be *kōniz and *rēdaz. (The citation given for 'conja' and 'rad' is of course not a reputable work of historical linguistics.)

2) There is no evidence provided for this name having existed in the Proto-language: I am familiar only evidence for it appearing in OHG. Perhaps others are more familiar? Of course, the ultimate origin of the compound lies in Germanic.

The line in question:

'It is derived from the Proto-Germanic name Konrad, from conja meaning "bold" and rad "counsel".[1]'

All the best.